Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (<i>Pisum sativum </i>L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia

Ersullo Lere; Shimelis Mohammed; Mukerem Elias; Muluneh Mekiso

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia

Ersullo Lere, Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muluneh Mekiso

Published in International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology (Volume 7, Issue 1)

Received: 29 October 2021 Accepted: 23 November 2021 Published: 25 April 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the major legumes grown in Ethiopia as well as in Southern Ethiopia. Field experiment was conducted with eight field pea genotypes for two consecutive years (2017 - 2018) comprising six environments in order to determine the effect of genotype x environment (GxE) interaction and to identify specific and wider adaptability. The objective of this study was to identify and select high performing varieties with better adaptability. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications in each environment. Grain yield data was analyzed using analysis of variance and AMMI models. The combined analysis of variance of grain yield showed a highly significant differences (P<0.001) for environments, varieties and GxE interactions. The significant differences for the GxE interaction indicated the necessity of analyzing the stability of the varieties across the environments in order to select stable ones. The lowest mean grain yield of all varieties was obtained in E2 (Yem 2018) whereas the highest was obtained in E3 (Geta 2018). The average grain yield of the varieties ranged from 4571.0 kg/ha for G6 (Bukitu) to 4143.6 kg/ha for G4 (Gume). The AMMI analysis revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 80.61% of the treatment sum of squares while the varieties and the GxE interaction accounted for 3.99% and 15.40%, respectively. The mean squares were significant at P ≤ 0.001 for PCA 1 and at P ≤ 0.05 for PCA2 cumulatively contributing for 79.39% of the total GxE interaction sum of squares, indicating that most the information could be generated from the two axes. The AMMI analysis, AMMI stability value (ASV) and yield stability index (YSI) identified G5 (Bilalo), G7 (Adi) and G6 (Burkitu) as the most stable varieties with higher yields. AMMI biplots indicated that E2 (Yem2) with its lowest grain yield was identified as stable environment and E6 (Azernet2) as relatively stable with its yield higher than the grand mean. Therefore, the three stable and high yielding varieties (Bilalo, Adi and Burkit) can be recommended for the study areas and similar agro-eologies of the Southern Region. Varieties with grain yield higher than the grand mean such as G2 (Bursa) with an environment E1 (Yem1) as well as G6 (Burkitu) with environments E3 (Geta2) and E6 (Azernet2) showed specific adaptation.

Published in	International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
Page(s)	5-11
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Field Pea, Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI), Yield Stability Index, Interaction Principal Component Axes (IPCA)

References

[1]	CSA (2018). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2017/18 (2010 E.C.) Volume I report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season).
[2]	Romagosa, I. and P. N. Fox, (1993). Genotype x Environment interaction and Adaptation. In: Hayward, M. D. Bosemark, N. O. and Romagosa, I. (Eds.) Plant Breeding: Principles and Prospects. Chapman and Hall, London. Pp. 373-391.
[3]	Kaya, Y., C. Palta and S. Taner, (2002). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performance in bread wheat varieties across environments. Turk J. Agric. 26: 275-279.
[4]	Nassir A. L., O. J. Ariyo, (2011). Genotype x environment interaction and yield-stability analyses of rice grown in tropical inland swamp. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj, 39 (1): 220-225.
[5]	Ersullo LJ (2016). Genotype × Environment Interaction for Grain Yield of Some Field pea Genotypes in Central and North Eastern Zones of South Region, Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 4 (3): 071-080, http://doi.org/10.15580/GJPBCS.2016.3.050316082.
[6]	Zobel R. W., M. J Wright, H. G Gauch. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy J. 80: 388-393.
[7]	Crossa J, Gauch H G, Zobel RW (1990) Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci 30: 493-500.
[8]	Gauch, H. G. and R. W. Zobel., (1996). AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang, M. S. and Gauch, S. G. (eds) Genotypicby-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Pp. 85-121 Boca Raton, FL.
[9]	Gemechu K. (2006). A TECHNICAL MANUAL OF SEED PRODUCTION FOR HIGHLAND PULSES. A Training Workshop Organized for Development Agents (DAs) and Subject Matter Specialists (SMS) of MoARD, West Shewa Zone.
[10]	MoANR (Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resource), (2017). Plant variety release, protection and seed quality control directorate. Crop Variety register. ISSUE№ 20, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11]	Fetien Abay and Asmund Bjornstad. (2009). Identifying optimal testing environments of barley yield in the Northern Highlands of Ethiopia by Biplot Analysis. J. of Drylands 2 (1): 40-47.
[12]	Sabaghnia, N., M. Mohammadi and R. Karimizadeh, (2013). Parameters of AMMI Model for Yield Stability Analysis in Durum Wheat. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. Vol. 78 (2013) No. 2 (119-124).
[13]	Fiseha Baraki, YemaneTsehay and FetienAbay, (2015). AMMI Analysis of Genotype×Environment Interaction and Stability of Sesame Genotypes in Northern Ethiopia. Asian J. of Plant Sciences, 13: 178-183.
[14]	Farshadfar E., Mahmodi N. and Yaghotipoor A. (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). AJCS 5 (13): 1837-1844.
[15]	Odewale J. O., Ataga C. D., Agho C., Odiowaya G., Okoye M. N. and Okolo E. C. (2013). Genotype evaluation of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) and mega environment investigation based on additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Res. J. Agric. Environ. Manage. 2 (1), 001-010.
[16]	Purchase JL, Hatting H and Vandeventer CS (2000) Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) in South Africa: Π. Stability analysis of yield performance. South Afric J Plant Soil 17: 101-107.
[17]	Mohammadi R, Abdulahi A, Haghparast R and Armion M (2007) Interpreting genotype- environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using non-parametric methods. Euphytica 157: 239–251.
[18]	Dewi, A. K., M. A. Chozin, H. Triwidodo and H. Aswidinnoor, (2014). Genotype × environment interaction, and stability analysis in lowland rice promising genotypes. Int. J. of Agron. and Agri. Research. 5 (5): 74-84.
[19]	Mohammadi R, DavoodSadeghzadeh E, Mohammad A and Ahmed A (2011) Evaluation of durum wheat experimental lines under different climate and water regime conditions of Iran. Crop & Pasture Sci 62: 137–151.
[20]	Yan W, and Rajcan I (2002). Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11-20.
[21]	Kumar, S., D. K. Pandey, P. K. Singh and J. Singh, (2011). Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for sugarcane genotypes evaluated in multi-location trials. J. of Sugarcane Research 1 (2): 28-34.
[22]	Alake. C. O and O. J Ariyo, (2012). Comparative Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction Techniques in West African Okra (Abelmoschuscaillei, A. ChevStevels). J. of Agr. Sci. 4 (4): 4.
[23]	Purchase JL (1997). Parametric analysis to describe Genotype x Environment interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
[24]	Vargas M, Crossa J. (2000). The AMMI analysis and graphing the biplot. Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ersullo Lere, Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muluneh Mekiso. (2022). Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 7(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ersullo Lere; Shimelis Mohammed; Mukerem Elias; Muluneh Mekiso. Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. Int. J. Biochem. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2022, 7(1), 5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ersullo Lere, Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muluneh Mekiso. Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. Int J Biochem Biophys Mol Biol. 2022;7(1):5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12,
  author = {Ersullo Lere and Shimelis Mohammed and Mukerem Elias and Muluneh Mekiso},
  title = {Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {5-11},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  abstract = {Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the major legumes grown in Ethiopia as well as in Southern Ethiopia. Field experiment was conducted with eight field pea genotypes for two consecutive years (2017 - 2018) comprising six environments in order to determine the effect of genotype x environment (GxE) interaction and to identify specific and wider adaptability. The objective of this study was to identify and select high performing varieties with better adaptability. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications in each environment. Grain yield data was analyzed using analysis of variance and AMMI models. The combined analysis of variance of grain yield showed a highly significant differences (P<0.001) for environments, varieties and GxE interactions. The significant differences for the GxE interaction indicated the necessity of analyzing the stability of the varieties across the environments in order to select stable ones. The lowest mean grain yield of all varieties was obtained in E2 (Yem 2018) whereas the highest was obtained in E3 (Geta 2018). The average grain yield of the varieties ranged from 4571.0 kg/ha for G6 (Bukitu) to 4143.6 kg/ha for G4 (Gume). The AMMI analysis revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 80.61% of the treatment sum of squares while the varieties and the GxE interaction accounted for 3.99% and 15.40%, respectively. The mean squares were significant at P ≤ 0.001 for PCA 1 and at P ≤ 0.05 for PCA2 cumulatively contributing for 79.39% of the total GxE interaction sum of squares, indicating that most the information could be generated from the two axes. The AMMI analysis, AMMI stability value (ASV) and yield stability index (YSI) identified G5 (Bilalo), G7 (Adi) and G6 (Burkitu) as the most stable varieties with higher yields. AMMI biplots indicated that E2 (Yem2) with its lowest grain yield was identified as stable environment and E6 (Azernet2) as relatively stable with its yield higher than the grand mean. Therefore, the three stable and high yielding varieties (Bilalo, Adi and Burkit) can be recommended for the study areas and similar agro-eologies of the Southern Region. Varieties with grain yield higher than the grand mean such as G2 (Bursa) with an environment E1 (Yem1) as well as G6 (Burkitu) with environments E3 (Geta2) and E6 (Azernet2) showed specific adaptation.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia
AU  - Ersullo Lere
AU  - Shimelis Mohammed
AU  - Mukerem Elias
AU  - Muluneh Mekiso
Y1  - 2022/04/25
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
T2  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JF  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JO  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
SP  - 5
EP  - 11
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5862
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
AB  - Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the major legumes grown in Ethiopia as well as in Southern Ethiopia. Field experiment was conducted with eight field pea genotypes for two consecutive years (2017 - 2018) comprising six environments in order to determine the effect of genotype x environment (GxE) interaction and to identify specific and wider adaptability. The objective of this study was to identify and select high performing varieties with better adaptability. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications in each environment. Grain yield data was analyzed using analysis of variance and AMMI models. The combined analysis of variance of grain yield showed a highly significant differences (P<0.001) for environments, varieties and GxE interactions. The significant differences for the GxE interaction indicated the necessity of analyzing the stability of the varieties across the environments in order to select stable ones. The lowest mean grain yield of all varieties was obtained in E2 (Yem 2018) whereas the highest was obtained in E3 (Geta 2018). The average grain yield of the varieties ranged from 4571.0 kg/ha for G6 (Bukitu) to 4143.6 kg/ha for G4 (Gume). The AMMI analysis revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 80.61% of the treatment sum of squares while the varieties and the GxE interaction accounted for 3.99% and 15.40%, respectively. The mean squares were significant at P ≤ 0.001 for PCA 1 and at P ≤ 0.05 for PCA2 cumulatively contributing for 79.39% of the total GxE interaction sum of squares, indicating that most the information could be generated from the two axes. The AMMI analysis, AMMI stability value (ASV) and yield stability index (YSI) identified G5 (Bilalo), G7 (Adi) and G6 (Burkitu) as the most stable varieties with higher yields. AMMI biplots indicated that E2 (Yem2) with its lowest grain yield was identified as stable environment and E6 (Azernet2) as relatively stable with its yield higher than the grand mean. Therefore, the three stable and high yielding varieties (Bilalo, Adi and Burkit) can be recommended for the study areas and similar agro-eologies of the Southern Region. Varieties with grain yield higher than the grand mean such as G2 (Bursa) with an environment E1 (Yem1) as well as G6 (Burkitu) with environments E3 (Geta2) and E6 (Azernet2) showed specific adaptation.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ersullo Lere

South Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Worabe Agricultural Research Centre, Worabe, Ethiopia
Shimelis Mohammed

South Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Worabe Agricultural Research Centre, Worabe, Ethiopia
Mukerem Elias

South Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Worabe Agricultural Research Centre, Worabe, Ethiopia
Muluneh Mekiso

South Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Worabe Agricultural Research Centre, Worabe, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ersullo Lere, Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muluneh Mekiso. (2022). Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 7(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ersullo Lere; Shimelis Mohammed; Mukerem Elias; Muluneh Mekiso. Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. Int. J. Biochem. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2022, 7(1), 5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ersullo Lere, Shimelis Mohammed, Mukerem Elias, Muluneh Mekiso. Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia. Int J Biochem Biophys Mol Biol. 2022;7(1):5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12,
  author = {Ersullo Lere and Shimelis Mohammed and Mukerem Elias and Muluneh Mekiso},
  title = {Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {5-11},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbbmb.20220701.12},
  abstract = {Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the major legumes grown in Ethiopia as well as in Southern Ethiopia. Field experiment was conducted with eight field pea genotypes for two consecutive years (2017 - 2018) comprising six environments in order to determine the effect of genotype x environment (GxE) interaction and to identify specific and wider adaptability. The objective of this study was to identify and select high performing varieties with better adaptability. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications in each environment. Grain yield data was analyzed using analysis of variance and AMMI models. The combined analysis of variance of grain yield showed a highly significant differences (P<0.001) for environments, varieties and GxE interactions. The significant differences for the GxE interaction indicated the necessity of analyzing the stability of the varieties across the environments in order to select stable ones. The lowest mean grain yield of all varieties was obtained in E2 (Yem 2018) whereas the highest was obtained in E3 (Geta 2018). The average grain yield of the varieties ranged from 4571.0 kg/ha for G6 (Bukitu) to 4143.6 kg/ha for G4 (Gume). The AMMI analysis revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 80.61% of the treatment sum of squares while the varieties and the GxE interaction accounted for 3.99% and 15.40%, respectively. The mean squares were significant at P ≤ 0.001 for PCA 1 and at P ≤ 0.05 for PCA2 cumulatively contributing for 79.39% of the total GxE interaction sum of squares, indicating that most the information could be generated from the two axes. The AMMI analysis, AMMI stability value (ASV) and yield stability index (YSI) identified G5 (Bilalo), G7 (Adi) and G6 (Burkitu) as the most stable varieties with higher yields. AMMI biplots indicated that E2 (Yem2) with its lowest grain yield was identified as stable environment and E6 (Azernet2) as relatively stable with its yield higher than the grand mean. Therefore, the three stable and high yielding varieties (Bilalo, Adi and Burkit) can be recommended for the study areas and similar agro-eologies of the Southern Region. Varieties with grain yield higher than the grand mean such as G2 (Bursa) with an environment E1 (Yem1) as well as G6 (Burkitu) with environments E3 (Geta2) and E6 (Azernet2) showed specific adaptation.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Some Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties in Northern Part of South Regional State, Ethiopia
AU  - Ersullo Lere
AU  - Shimelis Mohammed
AU  - Mukerem Elias
AU  - Muluneh Mekiso
Y1  - 2022/04/25
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
T2  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JF  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JO  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
SP  - 5
EP  - 11
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5862
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20220701.12
AB  - Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the major legumes grown in Ethiopia as well as in Southern Ethiopia. Field experiment was conducted with eight field pea genotypes for two consecutive years (2017 - 2018) comprising six environments in order to determine the effect of genotype x environment (GxE) interaction and to identify specific and wider adaptability. The objective of this study was to identify and select high performing varieties with better adaptability. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications in each environment. Grain yield data was analyzed using analysis of variance and AMMI models. The combined analysis of variance of grain yield showed a highly significant differences (P<0.001) for environments, varieties and GxE interactions. The significant differences for the GxE interaction indicated the necessity of analyzing the stability of the varieties across the environments in order to select stable ones. The lowest mean grain yield of all varieties was obtained in E2 (Yem 2018) whereas the highest was obtained in E3 (Geta 2018). The average grain yield of the varieties ranged from 4571.0 kg/ha for G6 (Bukitu) to 4143.6 kg/ha for G4 (Gume). The AMMI analysis revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 80.61% of the treatment sum of squares while the varieties and the GxE interaction accounted for 3.99% and 15.40%, respectively. The mean squares were significant at P ≤ 0.001 for PCA 1 and at P ≤ 0.05 for PCA2 cumulatively contributing for 79.39% of the total GxE interaction sum of squares, indicating that most the information could be generated from the two axes. The AMMI analysis, AMMI stability value (ASV) and yield stability index (YSI) identified G5 (Bilalo), G7 (Adi) and G6 (Burkitu) as the most stable varieties with higher yields. AMMI biplots indicated that E2 (Yem2) with its lowest grain yield was identified as stable environment and E6 (Azernet2) as relatively stable with its yield higher than the grand mean. Therefore, the three stable and high yielding varieties (Bilalo, Adi and Burkit) can be recommended for the study areas and similar agro-eologies of the Southern Region. Varieties with grain yield higher than the grand mean such as G2 (Bursa) with an environment E1 (Yem1) as well as G6 (Burkitu) with environments E3 (Geta2) and E6 (Azernet2) showed specific adaptation.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download