In recent years, the financial crises that broke out in 2007 and the pandemic crises has brought forth the issue of government debt which again has drawn the attention of economists. The issue of debt becomes more complicated when the analysis concerns member states of a monetary union. In the case of EMU, the need for fiscal cooperation is essential for the stability of the union, yet fiscal cooperation is quite complex. In this paper we will attempt to estimate the size of fiscal multipliers using a VAR model for the member states of EMU for the period 2002-2019, controlling for the level of debt, size of the country and openness of the economy. Findings are in line with the relevant literature and shows that fiscal multiplier is higher in small open countries with less debt in comparison to other countries. These findings raise some important questions for the effectiveness and efficiency of fiscal rules in EMU. Given that multipliers are vary between countries of EMU, as our model suggests, fiscal rules could ultimately lead to multi speed fiscal adjustment Europe since some countries will succeed in restoring their fiscal position faster and more effectively than others.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17 |
Page(s) | 257-263 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fiscal Policy, European Monetary Union, Fiscal Multipliers, Debt, Fiscal Rules, VAR Model
[1] | Ferguson, T. and E. Kane (2020, 16 May). Coronavirus Means Zero Hour for the European Union, Institute for New Economic Thinking blog, [online] Available at: https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/coronavirus-meanszero-hour-for-the-european-union [Accessed 16 December 2020]. |
[2] | Buti, M., Giudice, G., and Leandro, J., 2020. Strengthening the Institutional Architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union. Centre for Economic Policy Research. |
[3] | Della Posta, P. and Tamborini, R., 2021. The existential trilemma of EMU in a model of fiscal target zone (No. 66). EconPol Working Paper. |
[4] | Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L., 2021. Failing forward in Economic and Monetary Union: explaining weak Eurozone financial support mechanisms. Journal of European Public Policy, 28 (10), pp. 1555–1572. |
[5] | Verdun, A., 1996. “An ‘Asymmetrical’ Economic and Monetary Union in the EU: Perceptions of Monetary Authorities and Social Partners.” Journal of European Integration, 20 (1), pp. 59–81. |
[6] | Howarth, D. and Verdun, A., 2020. Economic and Monetary Union at twenty: A stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade: Introduction. Journal of European integration, 42 (3), pp. 287–293. |
[7] | Hodson, D., 2020. EMU and political union revisited: what we learnt from the euro’s second decade. Journal of European Integration, 42 (3), pp. 295–310. |
[8] | Bauer, M. W., and S. Bekker., 2014. The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance. Journal of European Integration, 36 (3), pp. 213–229. |
[9] | Savage, J. D. and A. Verdun., 2016. “Strengthening the European Commission’s Budgetary and Economic Surveillance Capacity since Greece and the Euro Area Crisis: A Study of Five Directorates-General.” Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (1), pp. 101–118. |
[10] | Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Fiscal multipliers in recession and expansion. Fiscal policy after the financial crisis, 63, 98. |
[11] | Batini, N., Callegari, G., & Melina, G. (2012). Successful austerity in the United States, Europe and Japan. IMF Working Papers, 2012 (190), A001. Retrieved Feb 16, 2022, from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2012/190/article-A001-en.xml |
[12] | Riera-Crichton, D., Vegh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2015). Procyclical and countercyclical fiscal multipliers: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 52, 15-31. |
[13] | Silva, R., Carvalho, V. M., & Ribeiro, A. P. (2013). How large are fiscal multipliers? A panel-data VAR approach for the Euro area. FEP Working Papers no. 500, August, Porto, Portugal: Faculty of Economics University of Porto. |
[14] | Ramey, V. A., & Zubairy, S. (2018). Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy, 126 (2), 850-901. |
[15] | Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (1999). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending on output. NBER Working Paper, 7296, 101-106. |
[16] | Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. the Quarterly Journal of economics, 117 (4), 1329-1368. |
[17] | Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Végh, C. A. (2012). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of monetary economics, 60 (2), 239-254. |
[18] | Hory, M. P. (2016). Fiscal multipliers in Emerging Market Economies: can we learn something from Advanced Economies? International Economics, 146, 59-84. |
[19] | Chian Koh, W. (2017). Fiscal multipliers: new evidence from a large panel of countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 69 (3), 569-590. |
[20] | Corsetti, G., Meier, A., & Müller, G. J. (2012). What determines government spending multipliers? Economic Policy, 27 (72), 521-565. |
[21] | Born, B., Juessen, F., & Müller, G. J. (2013). Exchange rate regimes and fiscal multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37 (2), 446-465. |
[22] | Leeper, E. M., Walker, T. B., & Yang, S. C. S. (2008). Fiscal foresight: analytics and econometrics (No. w14028). National Bureau of Economic Research. |
[23] | Alcalá, F., & Ciccone, A. (2004). Trade and productivity. The Quarterly journal of economics, 119 (2), 613-646. |
[24] | Tang, K. K. (2011). Correcting the size bias in trade openness and globalization measures. Global Economy Journal, 11 (3), 1850235. |
[25] | Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2011). A new measure of trade openness. The World Economy, 34 (10), 1745-1770. |
[26] | Li, K., Morck, R., Yang, F., & Yeung, B. (2004). Firm-specific variation and openness in emerging markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (3), 658-669. |
[27] | Afonso, A., & Jalles, J. T. (2011). Appraising fiscal reaction functions. ISEG-UTL Economics Working Paper, (23) Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1955177. |
[28] | Kraay, A. (2012). How large is the government spending multiplier? Evidence from World Bank lending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (2), 829-887. |
[29] | Deskar Škrbić, M., & Šimović, H. (2015). The size and determinants of fiscal multipliers in Western Balkans: comparing Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia. EFZG working paper series, (10), 1-21. |
APA Style
Theodore Chatziapostolou. (2022). European Monetary Union Towards a Multi-speed ‘Fiscal Adjustment’ Europe. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 11(4), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17
ACS Style
Theodore Chatziapostolou. European Monetary Union Towards a Multi-speed ‘Fiscal Adjustment’ Europe. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022, 11(4), 257-263. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17, author = {Theodore Chatziapostolou}, title = {European Monetary Union Towards a Multi-speed ‘Fiscal Adjustment’ Europe}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {257-263}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20221104.17}, abstract = {In recent years, the financial crises that broke out in 2007 and the pandemic crises has brought forth the issue of government debt which again has drawn the attention of economists. The issue of debt becomes more complicated when the analysis concerns member states of a monetary union. In the case of EMU, the need for fiscal cooperation is essential for the stability of the union, yet fiscal cooperation is quite complex. In this paper we will attempt to estimate the size of fiscal multipliers using a VAR model for the member states of EMU for the period 2002-2019, controlling for the level of debt, size of the country and openness of the economy. Findings are in line with the relevant literature and shows that fiscal multiplier is higher in small open countries with less debt in comparison to other countries. These findings raise some important questions for the effectiveness and efficiency of fiscal rules in EMU. Given that multipliers are vary between countries of EMU, as our model suggests, fiscal rules could ultimately lead to multi speed fiscal adjustment Europe since some countries will succeed in restoring their fiscal position faster and more effectively than others.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - European Monetary Union Towards a Multi-speed ‘Fiscal Adjustment’ Europe AU - Theodore Chatziapostolou Y1 - 2022/08/31 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 257 EP - 263 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.17 AB - In recent years, the financial crises that broke out in 2007 and the pandemic crises has brought forth the issue of government debt which again has drawn the attention of economists. The issue of debt becomes more complicated when the analysis concerns member states of a monetary union. In the case of EMU, the need for fiscal cooperation is essential for the stability of the union, yet fiscal cooperation is quite complex. In this paper we will attempt to estimate the size of fiscal multipliers using a VAR model for the member states of EMU for the period 2002-2019, controlling for the level of debt, size of the country and openness of the economy. Findings are in line with the relevant literature and shows that fiscal multiplier is higher in small open countries with less debt in comparison to other countries. These findings raise some important questions for the effectiveness and efficiency of fiscal rules in EMU. Given that multipliers are vary between countries of EMU, as our model suggests, fiscal rules could ultimately lead to multi speed fiscal adjustment Europe since some countries will succeed in restoring their fiscal position faster and more effectively than others. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -