The aims the present investigation aimed to point out some data concerning renal colic in Palestine, and to evaluate the practical clinic approach to it. All the renal colic cases treated in three month in the Hebron hospital ED, reviewed to assess the data, diagnostic and treatment patterns, and to compare them with what is reported in the literature. Retrospective study by review of file of emergency department in three month of renal colic or urinary stone. Renal colic were diagnosed in three month 300 cases (1%) from all vister of ED; 66 % of them were recurrent stone formers; the males 61%, female 39%, The age distribution, showed a higher rate from 25 to 44 years of age, Ultrasonography (US) was the examination in 72% cases, 99% lab test urine analysis. Diclofen were always used (90%), association with Hyoscine butylbromide, narcotic as pethidin (10%). The data of our investigation are in a substantial agreement with the reported literature bout features of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US and lab test. CT-scan was not used in ED. Conclusion; the data of our investigation agree substantially with those reported in the literature as far as concerns of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US whereas urine examination, most of patient given Diclofen, and Hyoscine butylbromide and 10% given narcotic. In pale stain treated the renal colic as national guide.
Published in | International Journal of Clinical Urology (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13 |
Page(s) | 11-14 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Renal Colic, Stones, Emergency Department
[1] | Amato M, Lusini ML, Nelli F (2004) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis today. Urol Int 1: 1–5. |
[2] | Brown J (2006) Diagnostic and treatment patterns for renal colic in US Emergency Departments. Int Urol Nephrol 38: 87–92. |
[3] | Coe FL, Parks JH, Asplin JR (1992) The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones. N Engl J Med 327: 1141–1152. |
[4] | Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX (2005). Conventional and alternative methods for providing analgesia in renal colic. BJU Int.; 95(3): 297–300. |
[5] | Davenport K, Waine E. The Role of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Renal Colic. Pharmaceuticals. 2010; 3(5): 1304–1310. |
[6] | Ducharme J, Barber C. (1995) A prospective blinded study of emergency pain assessment and. |
[7] | Ducharme J. (1994) Emergency pain management: A Canadian Association of Emergency. |
[8] | Holdgate A, Oh CM. Is there a role for antimuscarinics in renal colic? A randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2005; 174(2): 572–5. |
[9] | Lloret J, Munoz J, Monmany J, Puig X, Bonastre M, Brau J, Sola J, Domingo P, Jane F. Treatment of renal colic with dipyrone. Curr Ther Res 1987; 42: 1119-26. |
[10] | Lundstam S, Wahlander L, Leissner KH, Karl JG. Prostaglandin-synthetase inhibition with diclofenac sodium in treatment of renal colic: comparison with use of a narcotic analgesic. Lancet 1982; 1: 1096-7. |
[11] | MOH, annual report, 2015. |
[12] | Paris PM, Stewart RD (1988) (Eds.) Pain management in emergency medicine. Norwalk, CT. Appelton and Lange. Physicians consensus document Journal of Emergency Medicine 12: 855–66. |
[13] | Samad EJ Golzari, Hassan Soleimanpour, Farzad Rahmani, Nahid Zamani Mehr, Saeid Safari, Yaghoub Heshmat, Hanieh Ebrahimi Bakhtavar 2014 Feb; Therapeutic Approaches for Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: A Review Article4(1): e16222. Published online 2014 Feb 13. doi: 10.5812/aapm.16222 PMCID: PMC3961032. |
[14] | Sanahuja J, Corbera G, Garau J, Pl R, Carmen Carre M. Intramuscular diclofenac sodium versus intravenous baralgin in the treatment of renal colic. DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 1990; 24: 361-4. |
[15] | Seifter JL, Brenner BM. Urinary Tract Obstruction. Harrison principles of internal medicine; 17th ed. Braunwald: McGraw Hill, 2008; 1827-30. |
[16] | Serinken M, Karcioglu O, Turkcuer I, Ozkan HI, Keysan MK, Bukiran (2008) A. Analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics of patients presenting with renal colic in the emergency department. BMC Res Notes.; 1: 79. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-79 therapy. Journal of Emergency Medicine 13: 571. |
[17] | Thompson JF, Pike JM, Chumas PD, Rundle JSH. Rectal diclofenac compared with pethidine injection in acute renal colic. Br Med J 1989; 299: 1140-1. |
APA Style
Mohammad Qtait, Salah Tamiza. (2017). Treatment of Renal Colic in Emergency Hebron Government Hospital. International Journal of Clinical Urology, 1(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13
ACS Style
Mohammad Qtait; Salah Tamiza. Treatment of Renal Colic in Emergency Hebron Government Hospital. Int. J. Clin. Urol. 2017, 1(1), 11-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13, author = {Mohammad Qtait and Salah Tamiza}, title = {Treatment of Renal Colic in Emergency Hebron Government Hospital}, journal = {International Journal of Clinical Urology}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {11-14}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcu.20170101.13}, abstract = {The aims the present investigation aimed to point out some data concerning renal colic in Palestine, and to evaluate the practical clinic approach to it. All the renal colic cases treated in three month in the Hebron hospital ED, reviewed to assess the data, diagnostic and treatment patterns, and to compare them with what is reported in the literature. Retrospective study by review of file of emergency department in three month of renal colic or urinary stone. Renal colic were diagnosed in three month 300 cases (1%) from all vister of ED; 66 % of them were recurrent stone formers; the males 61%, female 39%, The age distribution, showed a higher rate from 25 to 44 years of age, Ultrasonography (US) was the examination in 72% cases, 99% lab test urine analysis. Diclofen were always used (90%), association with Hyoscine butylbromide, narcotic as pethidin (10%). The data of our investigation are in a substantial agreement with the reported literature bout features of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US and lab test. CT-scan was not used in ED. Conclusion; the data of our investigation agree substantially with those reported in the literature as far as concerns of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US whereas urine examination, most of patient given Diclofen, and Hyoscine butylbromide and 10% given narcotic. In pale stain treated the renal colic as national guide.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Treatment of Renal Colic in Emergency Hebron Government Hospital AU - Mohammad Qtait AU - Salah Tamiza Y1 - 2017/07/18 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13 T2 - International Journal of Clinical Urology JF - International Journal of Clinical Urology JO - International Journal of Clinical Urology SP - 11 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1355 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20170101.13 AB - The aims the present investigation aimed to point out some data concerning renal colic in Palestine, and to evaluate the practical clinic approach to it. All the renal colic cases treated in three month in the Hebron hospital ED, reviewed to assess the data, diagnostic and treatment patterns, and to compare them with what is reported in the literature. Retrospective study by review of file of emergency department in three month of renal colic or urinary stone. Renal colic were diagnosed in three month 300 cases (1%) from all vister of ED; 66 % of them were recurrent stone formers; the males 61%, female 39%, The age distribution, showed a higher rate from 25 to 44 years of age, Ultrasonography (US) was the examination in 72% cases, 99% lab test urine analysis. Diclofen were always used (90%), association with Hyoscine butylbromide, narcotic as pethidin (10%). The data of our investigation are in a substantial agreement with the reported literature bout features of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US and lab test. CT-scan was not used in ED. Conclusion; the data of our investigation agree substantially with those reported in the literature as far as concerns of renal colic and its treatment. The diagnostic approach is mainly based on US whereas urine examination, most of patient given Diclofen, and Hyoscine butylbromide and 10% given narcotic. In pale stain treated the renal colic as national guide. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -