This research investigated the importance of social capital and public trust in Nordic governments' decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social capital or trust is a valuable yet difficult asset for governments to acquire. By examining the level of public trust in the government, one can understand the level of social resilience and tolerance of the people of a country towards the government's decisions in critical situations. If this capital is substantial, the government can rely on it to make difficult decisions with fewer challenges, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method in this article is quantitative and qualitative with an interpretive approach to the available statistical data and their investigation in the conceptual framework of the research, which was the conceptual model of Nordic development. The findings showed that social capital plays an essential role in the decision-making process of governments. The governments of the Nordic countries made complex decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They faced fewer challenges due to the citizens' social trust, which made the governments better be able to allocate financial resources to different sectors, especially the welfare. Considering that these government decisions were in line with the public interest, they were welcomed by the people. A fact that was facilitated by the people's trust in the government. More empirical research is needed to measure the different dimensions of social capital in Nordic countries and its multifaceted benefits in those societies.
Published in | International Journal of European Studies (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11 |
Page(s) | 12-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
COVID-19, Social Resilience, Nordic Development Model, Public Trust
[1] | Pradhan RP. Good governance and human development: Evidence form Indian States. J Soc Dev Sci. 2011; 1 (1): 1–8. |
[2] | Keck M, Sakdapolrak P. What is social resilience? lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde. 2013; 67 (1): 5–19. |
[3] | Chan CML, Qiu D, Tan FTC. Smart community and social resilience: Reflection on the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2021; 2020-Janua (February): 2444–53. |
[4] | Fernández-Prados JS, Lozano-Díaz A, Muyor-Rodríguez J. Factors explaining social resilience against COVID-19: the case of Spain. Eur Soc. 2021; 23 (S1): S111–21. |
[5] | Reiersen J, Torp S. The Nordic Income Equality Model in Health Promotion. 97. 2020; 405–16. |
[6] | mary nolan. The transatlantic century: Europe and America, 1890-2010. University WBE, T. C. W. Blanning Sidney Sussex College C, Brendan Simms Peterhouse C, editors. Cambridge University press; 2012. 403 p. |
[7] | Iqbal R, Todi P. The Nordic Model: Existence, Emergence and Sustainability. Procedia Econ Financ [Internet]. 2015; 30 (15): 336–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01301-5 |
[8] | Danson M, Mcalpine R, Spicker P, Sullivan W. The case for universalism: An assessment of the evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of the universal welfare state. 2012; (December). Available from: http://reidfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/The-Case-for-Universalism.pdf |
[9] | Alestalo M, Hort SEO, Kuhnle S. The Nordic Model: Conditions, Origins, Outcomes, Lessons. Hertie Sch Gov. 2009; (41): 60. |
[10] | Kildal N, Kuhnle S. Normative Foundations of the Welfare State [Internet]. Routledge; 2007. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134272839 |
[11] | Delhey J, Newton K. Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? Eur Sociol Rev. 2005; 21 (4): 311–27. |
[12] | Andersen TM, Holmstrom B, Honkapohja S, Korkman S, Soderstrom HT, Vartiainen J. The Nordic Model: Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks [Internet]. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy, 2007, pp. 165. 2007. 1–165 p. Available from: http://libproxy.library.wmich.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/56811629?accountid=15099%0Ahttps://primo-pmtna01.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/01WMU/01WMU?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&genre=book&sid=ProQ:Pro |
[13] | Koivunen A, Ojala J, Holmén J. Always in crisis, always a solution? In: The Nordic Economic, Social and Political Model. 2021. p. 1–19. |
[14] | Holtskog H, Carayannis EG, Kaloudis A, Ringen G. Learning Factories [Internet]. Vol. 3, European Journal of Workplace Innovation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. Available from: https://journal.uia.no/index.php/EJWI/article/view/453 |
[15] | Hiilamo H. Adapting the Nordic welfare state model to the challenges of automation. In: The Nordic Economic, Social and Political Model [Internet]. Routledge; 2021. p. 227–41. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429643446/chapters/10.4324/9780429026690-10 |
[16] | Hiilamo H. Adapting the Nordic welfare state model to the challenges of automation. In: The Nordic Economic, Social and Political Model: Challenges in the 21st Century. 2021. p. 227–41. |
[17] | Maclean K, Cuthill M, Ross H. Six attributes of social resilience. J Environ Plan Manag [Internet]. 2014; 57 (1): 144–56. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.763774 |
[18] | Aldrich DP, Meyer MA. Social Capital and Community Resilience. Am Behav Sci. 2015; 59 (2): 254–69. |
[19] | Andreasson U. Trust - the Nordic gold. Trust - Nord gold. 2017; |
[20] | Bjørnskov C (2006). TD of TRWPN 86. The Determinants of Trust [Internet]. 2006. Report No.: 86. Available from: https://ratio.se/en/publications/working-paper-86-determinants-trust/ |
[21] | Rainio-Niemi J. A Nordic Paradox of Openness and Consensus? The Case of Finland. In: Norbert Götz CM, editor. The Paradox of Openness [Internet]. BRILL; 2015. p. 27–49. Available from: https://brill.com/view/book/9789004281196/B9789004281196-s004.xml |
[22] | Robert D. Putnam. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. SIMON & SCHUSTER; 2000. 747 p. |
[23] | Klein R. Peter Flora (ed.), Growth to Limits: The Western European Welfare States since World War II. Vol. 1 Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark. Vol. 2 Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986, XXXIV + 383 pp. and XXXIV + 500 pp. resp. J Public Policy [Internet]. 1987 Oct 28; 7 (4): 456–8. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026569148901900421 |
[24] | Hippe JM. NordMod2030 Summaries of project reports. 2014; (August): 1–90. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281203695_Nordmod_2030_Summaries_of_project_reports |
[25] | Swenson PA. Capitalists against Markets [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195142977.001.0001/acprof-9780195142976 |
[26] | Ilkka Ruostetsaari. Elite Recruitment and Coherence of the Inner Core of Power in Finland. Lexington Books; 2015. 242 p. www.nordicstatistics.org |
APA Style
Amin Goodarzvand, Hadi Farahani. (2022). Social Resilience and Public Trust in International Crises; Case Study of the Nordic Development Model in COVID-19 Pandemic (2018 to 2020). International Journal of European Studies, 6(2), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11
ACS Style
Amin Goodarzvand; Hadi Farahani. Social Resilience and Public Trust in International Crises; Case Study of the Nordic Development Model in COVID-19 Pandemic (2018 to 2020). Int. J. Eur. Stud. 2022, 6(2), 12-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11, author = {Amin Goodarzvand and Hadi Farahani}, title = {Social Resilience and Public Trust in International Crises; Case Study of the Nordic Development Model in COVID-19 Pandemic (2018 to 2020)}, journal = {International Journal of European Studies}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {12-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijes.20220602.11}, abstract = {This research investigated the importance of social capital and public trust in Nordic governments' decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social capital or trust is a valuable yet difficult asset for governments to acquire. By examining the level of public trust in the government, one can understand the level of social resilience and tolerance of the people of a country towards the government's decisions in critical situations. If this capital is substantial, the government can rely on it to make difficult decisions with fewer challenges, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method in this article is quantitative and qualitative with an interpretive approach to the available statistical data and their investigation in the conceptual framework of the research, which was the conceptual model of Nordic development. The findings showed that social capital plays an essential role in the decision-making process of governments. The governments of the Nordic countries made complex decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They faced fewer challenges due to the citizens' social trust, which made the governments better be able to allocate financial resources to different sectors, especially the welfare. Considering that these government decisions were in line with the public interest, they were welcomed by the people. A fact that was facilitated by the people's trust in the government. More empirical research is needed to measure the different dimensions of social capital in Nordic countries and its multifaceted benefits in those societies.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Social Resilience and Public Trust in International Crises; Case Study of the Nordic Development Model in COVID-19 Pandemic (2018 to 2020) AU - Amin Goodarzvand AU - Hadi Farahani Y1 - 2022/08/31 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11 T2 - International Journal of European Studies JF - International Journal of European Studies JO - International Journal of European Studies SP - 12 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9562 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20220602.11 AB - This research investigated the importance of social capital and public trust in Nordic governments' decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social capital or trust is a valuable yet difficult asset for governments to acquire. By examining the level of public trust in the government, one can understand the level of social resilience and tolerance of the people of a country towards the government's decisions in critical situations. If this capital is substantial, the government can rely on it to make difficult decisions with fewer challenges, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method in this article is quantitative and qualitative with an interpretive approach to the available statistical data and their investigation in the conceptual framework of the research, which was the conceptual model of Nordic development. The findings showed that social capital plays an essential role in the decision-making process of governments. The governments of the Nordic countries made complex decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They faced fewer challenges due to the citizens' social trust, which made the governments better be able to allocate financial resources to different sectors, especially the welfare. Considering that these government decisions were in line with the public interest, they were welcomed by the people. A fact that was facilitated by the people's trust in the government. More empirical research is needed to measure the different dimensions of social capital in Nordic countries and its multifaceted benefits in those societies. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -