In the proposed study, the authors deal with a discourse (compared to a text) as a special verbatology form. The authors proceed from the general settings of narrative theory, and upgrade it with methodological achievements of verbatology, linguistics of text, genius and functional stylistics, – with the aim to specify the notions of discourse and text in the theoretical discussion. Considering various approaches to these concepts and definitions of the two concepts, as formulated and observed from various theoretical aspects, the authors have come to believe that a text and a discourse are actually higher rank structures in relation to the syntactic language forms, i.e. that the forms of suprasentential or, actually, genre organization of the verbal activities are on one side, while the forms of its written representation are on the other side. Here we have the concept of discourse in the foreground, and we have understood the text as a support, i.e. as our starting point in the discussion, in relation to which we define the discourse. Observed in such theoretical perspective – a discourse represents the linguistic base and the structural background of the text, including all important processes of preparation and creation of structural forms of the verbal activity as a whole.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12 |
Page(s) | 8-12 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Discourse, Text, Sentence, Statement
[1] | Z. Harris, “Discourse Analysis,”Language. Linguistic Society of America,vol. 28, No. 1, pp.1–30. Jan.-Mar., 1952. |
[2] | J. Jovanović Simić i R. Simić, Verbatologija (lingvističke osnove nauke o verbalizaciji sveta). Beograd: NDSJ i Jasen, 2015, pp. 14–29. |
[3] | G. Genette, Die Erzählung, 3. Aufl. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2009, pp.11–13. |
[4] | H. P. Abot, Uvod u teorijuproze. Beograd: Official Gazette, 2009, pp.34. |
[5] | V. Dementjev, Teorija govornih žanrova, Moskva: Znak, 2010, pp.10. |
[6] | R. Simeon, Enciklopedijski rječnik lingvističkih naziva. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 1969, s.v. “diskurs”. |
[7] | R. L. Trеsk, Temeljni lingvistički pojmovi. Zagreb: Školska knjiga, 2005, s.v.“diskurs”. |
[8] | Dž. L. Ostin, Kako delovati rečima.Novi Sad: Književna zajednica Novog Sada, 1994, pp.22–27. |
[9] | А. Martine, Jezik i funkcija. Sarajevo: Svjetlost i Zavod za udžbenike, 1973, pp.59–61. |
[10] | RKT, Rečnik književnih termina, drugo, dopunjeno izdanje, ur. Dragiša Živković, Institut za književnost i umetnost u Beogradu. Beograd: Nolit, 1992. s.v.“diskurs”,“diskurzivan”. |
[11] | D. Kristal, Enciklopedijski rečnik moderne lingvistike. Beograd: Nolit, 1988, s.v. “diskurs”. |
[12] | P. Vučković, Ogledi iz semantike i pragmatike. Beograd: Savremena administracija, 1995, pp.114–117. |
[13] | Zr. Glovacki-Bernardi, O tekstu. Zagreb: Školska knjiga, 2004, pp.27–44. |
[14] | R. Simić, Politički diskurs: inflacija reči u samoupravnom društvu. Jezička profilaksa. Zemun: МХ Aktuel, 1996, pp.10–29. |
[15] | B. Šijaković, Kritika balkanističkog diskursa. Prilog fenomenologiji drugosti Balkana. Nikšić: Jasen, 2000, pp.47–63. |
[16] | N. Silaški, T. Đurović i B. Radić-Bojanić, Javni diskurs Srbije. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta, 2009, pp.31–37. |
[17] | J. Jovanović, Lingvistika i stilistika novinskog umeća. Jezičke i stilske osobine novinarstva. Beograd: Jasen, 2010, pp.7–30. |
APA Style
Jelena Jovanović Simić, Radoje Simić. (2019). Some Theoretical Observations on Discourse (and Text). International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12
ACS Style
Jelena Jovanović Simić; Radoje Simić. Some Theoretical Observations on Discourse (and Text). Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2019, 7(1), 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12
AMA Style
Jelena Jovanović Simić, Radoje Simić. Some Theoretical Observations on Discourse (and Text). Int J Lang Linguist. 2019;7(1):8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12, author = {Jelena Jovanović Simić and Radoje Simić}, title = {Some Theoretical Observations on Discourse (and Text)}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {8-12}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20190701.12}, abstract = {In the proposed study, the authors deal with a discourse (compared to a text) as a special verbatology form. The authors proceed from the general settings of narrative theory, and upgrade it with methodological achievements of verbatology, linguistics of text, genius and functional stylistics, – with the aim to specify the notions of discourse and text in the theoretical discussion. Considering various approaches to these concepts and definitions of the two concepts, as formulated and observed from various theoretical aspects, the authors have come to believe that a text and a discourse are actually higher rank structures in relation to the syntactic language forms, i.e. that the forms of suprasentential or, actually, genre organization of the verbal activities are on one side, while the forms of its written representation are on the other side. Here we have the concept of discourse in the foreground, and we have understood the text as a support, i.e. as our starting point in the discussion, in relation to which we define the discourse. Observed in such theoretical perspective – a discourse represents the linguistic base and the structural background of the text, including all important processes of preparation and creation of structural forms of the verbal activity as a whole.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Some Theoretical Observations on Discourse (and Text) AU - Jelena Jovanović Simić AU - Radoje Simić Y1 - 2019/01/24 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 8 EP - 12 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.12 AB - In the proposed study, the authors deal with a discourse (compared to a text) as a special verbatology form. The authors proceed from the general settings of narrative theory, and upgrade it with methodological achievements of verbatology, linguistics of text, genius and functional stylistics, – with the aim to specify the notions of discourse and text in the theoretical discussion. Considering various approaches to these concepts and definitions of the two concepts, as formulated and observed from various theoretical aspects, the authors have come to believe that a text and a discourse are actually higher rank structures in relation to the syntactic language forms, i.e. that the forms of suprasentential or, actually, genre organization of the verbal activities are on one side, while the forms of its written representation are on the other side. Here we have the concept of discourse in the foreground, and we have understood the text as a support, i.e. as our starting point in the discussion, in relation to which we define the discourse. Observed in such theoretical perspective – a discourse represents the linguistic base and the structural background of the text, including all important processes of preparation and creation of structural forms of the verbal activity as a whole. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -