Since the second ruling of Abe, the "Indo-Pacific Strategy" has gradually came into being and being regarded as a key strategy to instruct Japan’s acts on maritime security. In that this strategy is of vital importance to the freedom of China’s oceanic movements, the study on this subject is significant to the Sino-Japan relationship. Drawing on ideological rhetorical criticism and corpus-assisted methods with software of SPSS, by combining "ideographs" and "policy triggers", this paper aims to explore the ideology under the discourse construction of Japan's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" from 2012 to 2018. Moreover, by analyzing the rhetorical strategies based on Burke’s identification theory, we have tried to examine how the audiences’ ideology are being manipulated. The study shows that Abe's government has constructed an ideological rhetorical system to curb the China's rise, build a new maritime order, and concealed the ideological undercurrent of nationalism by terministic screens. At the same time, the Abe government indoctrinated and manipulated the audiences' ideologies by rhetorical strategies of "identification by sympathy" and "identification by antithesis".
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15 |
Page(s) | 277-285 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Abe Government, Indo-Pacific Strategy, Ideograph, Policy Trigger, Terministic Screen, Rhetorical Strategy
[1] | Abe, Shinzo. 2013. “Japan is Back”. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/96_abe/statement/2013/0223speech.html. |
[2] | Xu, Wansheng, Guangxin Zhang, etc. 2018. Order Construction and Japan's Strategic Response. Beijing: Current Affairs Press. |
[3] | Leo, J. 2009. Bush Legacy: Better US——India Relations. Singapore: The Straits Times. |
[4] | Mclelland, David. 1986. Ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. |
[5] | Burke, K. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Burke: University of California Press. |
[6] | Edwin, B. 1965. Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. |
[7] | James, R. A. 1983. The Practice of Rhetorical Criticism. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. |
[8] | Perelman, & Leslie C. 1984. Gerald prince, Narratology: the Form and Function of Narrative. Language in Society, 13 (03), 377 |
[9] | Deng Zhiyong. 2011. “Rhetoric Theory and Philosophy of Rhetoric: A Study of Kenneth Burke, a Great Rhetoric Expert”. Shanghai: Xuelin Press, 78-79. |
[10] | McGee, M. 1980. The Ideograph: A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology [J]. Quarterly Journal of Speech, (66): 7. |
[11] | Longaker, M. G. & Walker, J. 2011. Rhetorical Analysis: A Brief Guide for Writers. New York: Long-man. |
[12] | Ritzer, Lloyd. Functional Communication: A Situational Perspective [A]. Ed. White, E. State College. Rhetoric in Transition: Studies in the Nature and Users of Rhetoric [C]. PN: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1980. |
[13] | Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. 2014. Annual Health, Labor and Welfare Report 2013-2014. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw8/index.html. |
[14] | Defense of Japan 2013 (25th Edition) –The Annul White Paper. http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2013/w2013_00.html. |
[15] | Defense of Japan 2012 (24th Edition) –The Annul White Paper. http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2012/w2012_00.html. |
[16] | Defense of Japan 2018 (30th Edition) –The Annue White Paper. https://www.mod.go.jp/j/publication/wp/index.html, 2018. |
[17] | JMSDF Command and Staff College. 2012. Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Staff College Review. https://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/navcol/SSG/review.html. |
APA Style
Weiqi Tian, Hongmei Chai. (2019). Rhetorical Strategies in Political Texts of "Indo-pacific Strategy" of the Abe Government. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(6), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15
ACS Style
Weiqi Tian; Hongmei Chai. Rhetorical Strategies in Political Texts of "Indo-pacific Strategy" of the Abe Government. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2019, 7(6), 277-285. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15
AMA Style
Weiqi Tian, Hongmei Chai. Rhetorical Strategies in Political Texts of "Indo-pacific Strategy" of the Abe Government. Int J Lang Linguist. 2019;7(6):277-285. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15, author = {Weiqi Tian and Hongmei Chai}, title = {Rhetorical Strategies in Political Texts of "Indo-pacific Strategy" of the Abe Government}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {277-285}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20190706.15}, abstract = {Since the second ruling of Abe, the "Indo-Pacific Strategy" has gradually came into being and being regarded as a key strategy to instruct Japan’s acts on maritime security. In that this strategy is of vital importance to the freedom of China’s oceanic movements, the study on this subject is significant to the Sino-Japan relationship. Drawing on ideological rhetorical criticism and corpus-assisted methods with software of SPSS, by combining "ideographs" and "policy triggers", this paper aims to explore the ideology under the discourse construction of Japan's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" from 2012 to 2018. Moreover, by analyzing the rhetorical strategies based on Burke’s identification theory, we have tried to examine how the audiences’ ideology are being manipulated. The study shows that Abe's government has constructed an ideological rhetorical system to curb the China's rise, build a new maritime order, and concealed the ideological undercurrent of nationalism by terministic screens. At the same time, the Abe government indoctrinated and manipulated the audiences' ideologies by rhetorical strategies of "identification by sympathy" and "identification by antithesis".}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Rhetorical Strategies in Political Texts of "Indo-pacific Strategy" of the Abe Government AU - Weiqi Tian AU - Hongmei Chai Y1 - 2019/10/28 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 277 EP - 285 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190706.15 AB - Since the second ruling of Abe, the "Indo-Pacific Strategy" has gradually came into being and being regarded as a key strategy to instruct Japan’s acts on maritime security. In that this strategy is of vital importance to the freedom of China’s oceanic movements, the study on this subject is significant to the Sino-Japan relationship. Drawing on ideological rhetorical criticism and corpus-assisted methods with software of SPSS, by combining "ideographs" and "policy triggers", this paper aims to explore the ideology under the discourse construction of Japan's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" from 2012 to 2018. Moreover, by analyzing the rhetorical strategies based on Burke’s identification theory, we have tried to examine how the audiences’ ideology are being manipulated. The study shows that Abe's government has constructed an ideological rhetorical system to curb the China's rise, build a new maritime order, and concealed the ideological undercurrent of nationalism by terministic screens. At the same time, the Abe government indoctrinated and manipulated the audiences' ideologies by rhetorical strategies of "identification by sympathy" and "identification by antithesis". VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -