A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering

Jiayu Bao

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering

Jiayu Bao

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 2)

Received: 23 February 2022 Accepted: 9 March 2022 Published: 15 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Stance adverbs are one of the main means to express the author's attitude and views on proposition information. This study bases on self-built corpus, taking the English abstracts of Chinese and American doctoral dissertations in the field of petroleum engineering as the corpus and analyzing the characteristics of stance adverbs used by Chinese and their American counterparts. The results show that: 1) there is no statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, and both of them show a tendency of "epistemic stance adverbs > attitude stance adverbs > style-of-speaking stance adverbs"; 2) There is no significant difference in the frequency of using epistemic stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors significantly use more boosters, a subcategory of epistemic stance adverbs, showing the rigid traces of English writing style. Chinese doctors significantly use certain hedges, the other subcategory of stance adverbs; 3) There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of using attitude stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors use more attitude stance adverbs to express affect than evaluation; 4) There is no significant difference in the frequency of style-of-speaking stance adverbs between them, and the fact that the use of this kind of stance adverbs is used least may be affected by the stylistic characteristics of the English abstract.

Published in	International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
Page(s)	95-102
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Stance Adverbs, English Abstract, Petroleum Engineering, Epistemic, Attitude, Style-of-Speaking

References

[1]	Adams, H. & Quintana-Toledo, E. (2013). Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 13-22.
[2]	Ahmad, U. & Mehrjooseresht, M. (2012). Stance adverbials in engineering thesis abstracts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 29-36.
[3]	Barbaresi, L M. (1987). Obviously and certainly: Two different functions in argumentative discourse. Folia Linguistica, 21 (1): 3-24.
[4]	Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. New York: Longman Publishing.
[5]	Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (2): 97-116.
[6]	Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing [A]. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56-73.
[7]	Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes.
[8]	Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9 (1): 93-124.
[9]	Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
[10]	Capone, A. (2001). Modal adverbs and discourse. Progetti Linguisti, 14: 17-32.
[11]	Casagrande, J. (2010). It was the Best of Sentences, it was the Worst of Sentences: A Writer’s Guide to Crafting Killer Sentences. Berkeley, Ca.: Ten speed Press.
[12]	Chafe, W L. (1986). Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing [A]. In Chafe, W & Nicholas, J (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [C]. Norwood NJ: Ablex Pub Corp, 261-272.
[13]	Chen Jiansheng & Zhang Yan. (2010). A corpus-based survey of using stance adverbs in Chinese English majors compositions. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 10 (5), 140-144.
[14]	Chen Qingbin. (2021). A comparative study of stance markers in Chinese and International Research Article abstracts. Foreign Language Research, 219 (2), 41-47.
[15]	Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 271-287.
[16]	Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L. & Jiang F. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 46: 107-123.
[17]	Day, R. A. (1998). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (5^th ed.). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
[18]	Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
[19]	Hunston, S. &Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20]	Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (3): 239-256.
[21]	Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13 (2), 251-281.
[22]	Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13 (2), 133-151.
[23]	Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
[24]	Hyland, K & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of second language writing.
[25]	Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative That in Abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 123-139.
[26]	Jiang, F K. & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes.
[27]	Keizer, E. (2020). Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with functional discourse grammar – Science Direct. Language Sciences.
[28]	Li Zhi & Cheng Xiaomin. (2020). A comparative study of stance markers in English abstracts of Chinese and foreign academic journals. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 28 (2), 6-10.
[29]	Lou Baocui& Yao Wenting (2019). Features of Stance Adverbs in Learners’ Academic Writing. Journal of Henan University (Philosophy and Social Science, 46 (3), 114-120.
[30]	Martin, J. R. (2000) Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English [A]. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142-175.
[31]	Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[32]	McEnery, T. &Kifle, N. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers [A]. In Flowerdew J (ed.). Academic Discourse [C]. London: Longman, 182-195.
[33]	Meyer, P. G. (1997). Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In R. Markkanen, & H. Schroder (Eds.), Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
[34]	Myers, G. (2010). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies, 7 (4), 263-275.
[35]	Önder Özdemir, N. & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse Use in Thesis Abstracts: A Cross-Cultural Study. Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59-63.
[36]	Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[37]	Pan Fan (2012). A comparative study of stance adverbs used in Chinese and foreign academic papers from the perspective of Pragmatics. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 35 (5), 9-12.
[38]	Pérez-Paredes, P. & Bueno-Alastuey, M C. (2019). A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics, 140: 22-32.
[39]	Rozumko, A. (2018). Evidential strategies in receiver-directed talk: The case of English inferential adverbs, Lingua, 220: 1-16.
[40]	Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M. & Aijmer, K. (2007). The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs [M]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
[41]	Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 327-341.
[42]	Xv Fang. (2015). A study of authorial stance markers in L2 academic discourse. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (5), 1-7.
[43]	Xv Hongliang. (2007). A Corpus-Based Study of Authorial Stance Markers in Academic Research Discourse by Chinese Advanced EFL Writers. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology Publishing House.
[44]	Wang, S. W. & He, S. (2018). A Contrastive Study on the Cultural Context Characteristics in Mainland Chinese and American Scholars’ English Scientific Research Articles: A Case Study of Experimental Research Articles in Oil and Gas. Foreign Language World, (1). 88-96.
[45]	Waters, C. (2008). Actually, it's more than pragmatics, it's really grammaticalization. (Graduate Research Paper). Toronto working Papers in Linguistics. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
[46]	Wierzbicka, A. (2006). English: Meaning and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
[47]	Zhao Xiaolin. (2009). Expression of Stance in Chinese Learner English Stance Adverbs. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 32 (5), 54-59.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jiayu Bao. (2022). A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jiayu Bao. A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(2), 95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jiayu Bao. A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(2):95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15,
  author = {Jiayu Bao},
  title = {A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {95-102},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221002.15},
  abstract = {Stance adverbs are one of the main means to express the author's attitude and views on proposition information. This study bases on self-built corpus, taking the English abstracts of Chinese and American doctoral dissertations in the field of petroleum engineering as the corpus and analyzing the characteristics of stance adverbs used by Chinese and their American counterparts. The results show that: 1) there is no statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, and both of them show a tendency of "epistemic stance adverbs > attitude stance adverbs > style-of-speaking stance adverbs"; 2) There is no significant difference in the frequency of using epistemic stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors significantly use more boosters, a subcategory of epistemic stance adverbs, showing the rigid traces of English writing style. Chinese doctors significantly use certain hedges, the other subcategory of stance adverbs; 3) There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of using attitude stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors use more attitude stance adverbs to express affect than evaluation; 4) There is no significant difference in the frequency of style-of-speaking stance adverbs between them, and the fact that the use of this kind of stance adverbs is used least may be affected by the stylistic characteristics of the English abstract.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering
AU  - Jiayu Bao
Y1  - 2022/03/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 95
EP  - 102
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
AB  - Stance adverbs are one of the main means to express the author's attitude and views on proposition information. This study bases on self-built corpus, taking the English abstracts of Chinese and American doctoral dissertations in the field of petroleum engineering as the corpus and analyzing the characteristics of stance adverbs used by Chinese and their American counterparts. The results show that: 1) there is no statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, and both of them show a tendency of "epistemic stance adverbs > attitude stance adverbs > style-of-speaking stance adverbs"; 2) There is no significant difference in the frequency of using epistemic stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors significantly use more boosters, a subcategory of epistemic stance adverbs, showing the rigid traces of English writing style. Chinese doctors significantly use certain hedges, the other subcategory of stance adverbs; 3) There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of using attitude stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors use more attitude stance adverbs to express affect than evaluation; 4) There is no significant difference in the frequency of style-of-speaking stance adverbs between them, and the fact that the use of this kind of stance adverbs is used least may be affected by the stylistic characteristics of the English abstract.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jiayu Bao

School of Foreign Languages, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jiayu Bao. (2022). A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jiayu Bao. A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(2), 95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jiayu Bao. A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(2):95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15,
  author = {Jiayu Bao},
  title = {A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {95-102},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221002.15},
  abstract = {Stance adverbs are one of the main means to express the author's attitude and views on proposition information. This study bases on self-built corpus, taking the English abstracts of Chinese and American doctoral dissertations in the field of petroleum engineering as the corpus and analyzing the characteristics of stance adverbs used by Chinese and their American counterparts. The results show that: 1) there is no statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, and both of them show a tendency of "epistemic stance adverbs > attitude stance adverbs > style-of-speaking stance adverbs"; 2) There is no significant difference in the frequency of using epistemic stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors significantly use more boosters, a subcategory of epistemic stance adverbs, showing the rigid traces of English writing style. Chinese doctors significantly use certain hedges, the other subcategory of stance adverbs; 3) There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of using attitude stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors use more attitude stance adverbs to express affect than evaluation; 4) There is no significant difference in the frequency of style-of-speaking stance adverbs between them, and the fact that the use of this kind of stance adverbs is used least may be affected by the stylistic characteristics of the English abstract.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study on Stance Adverbs in Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations by Chinese and Americans — A Case Study in Petroleum Engineering
AU  - Jiayu Bao
Y1  - 2022/03/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 95
EP  - 102
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.15
AB  - Stance adverbs are one of the main means to express the author's attitude and views on proposition information. This study bases on self-built corpus, taking the English abstracts of Chinese and American doctoral dissertations in the field of petroleum engineering as the corpus and analyzing the characteristics of stance adverbs used by Chinese and their American counterparts. The results show that: 1) there is no statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, and both of them show a tendency of "epistemic stance adverbs > attitude stance adverbs > style-of-speaking stance adverbs"; 2) There is no significant difference in the frequency of using epistemic stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors significantly use more boosters, a subcategory of epistemic stance adverbs, showing the rigid traces of English writing style. Chinese doctors significantly use certain hedges, the other subcategory of stance adverbs; 3) There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of using attitude stance adverbs between Chinese and American doctors, but Chinese doctors use more attitude stance adverbs to express affect than evaluation; 4) There is no significant difference in the frequency of style-of-speaking stance adverbs between them, and the fact that the use of this kind of stance adverbs is used least may be affected by the stylistic characteristics of the English abstract.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download