A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian

Lei Huang; Chengyu Liu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

| Peer-Reviewed

A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian

Lei Huang, Chengyu Liu

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 2)

Received: 24 March 2022 Accepted: 9 April 2022 Published: 20 April 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Verbal nominals in traditional descriptions of Mongolian are described in terms of their morphological properties or meanings. They are assumed to act either as subordinate clauses, gerunds or infinitives like those in English. However, there is no a clear and reasonable explanation as to how the nominalized structures with the presence of verbal nominal change from process to thing. This paper, on the other hand, recognizes the Mongolian verbal nominal as syntactic nominalization from the functional and cognitive perspectives, which can be further divided into nominative case-marked subject nominalization, genitive case-marked subject nominalization and subject-missing nominalization. The paper proposes a generative framework for the syntactic nominalization in which the clause with verbal nominal is rank-shifted into a nominal expression by packaging the encoded information, and consequently while the verbal nominal suffix is reanalyzed as a nominalized element of the whole phrase or clause, the dynamic process of the clause is reanalyzed as a static event, and then the lexical and structural meanings of the embedded clause are re-matched via coercion. The functional and cognitive description presented in this paper provides a functionally and cognitively motivated interpretation of the generation mechanism of the syntactic nominalization in Mongolian and the interactions between the levels of lexicogrammar and semantics.

Published in	International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
Page(s)	132-142
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Mongolian Syntactic Nominalization, Rank-Shift, Reanalysis, Analogy, Coercion

References

[1]	Bai, Mengxuan, (2003). Mengguyu xingdongci yu yingyu feiweiyu xingshi duibi (A comparison between adjective verbs in Mongolian an nonfinite verbs in English). Neimenggu daxue xuebao (Journal of Inner Mongolia University ) 6, 67-71.
[2]	Binnick, Robert I. (1979). Modern Mongolian: A Transformational Syntax. Toronto/Buffalo/London, University of Toronto Press.
[3]	Bolcholu. (2000). Guangyu dongci budingshi wenti (The problem cencerning the so-called infinitive in Mongolian). Neimenggu daxue xuebao (Journal of inner Mongolia university ) 5, 24-26.
[4]	Borsley, R. D., Kornfifilt, J. (2000). Mixed extended projections. In: Borsley, R. D. (Ed.), The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories. New York/San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 101–131.
[5]	Daobu. (1983). Mengguyu Janzhi (Brief Records of the Mongolian Language). Minzu Chubanshe (The Ethnic Publishing House).
[6]	Gao, Lianhua. (2013). Mengyuyu xingrongci duanyu (The Mongolian adjectivized phrases). Neimenggu Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities ) 5, 31-34.
[7]	Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
[8]	Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[9]	Hale, K. (2002). On the Dagur object relative: some comparative notes. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 109–122.
[10]	Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, Edward Arnold.
[11]	Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th Ed.). Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London, Edward Arnold.
[12]	Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London, Continuum.
[13]	Harris, A. C., and Campbell, L. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[14]	Heyvaert, L. (2003). A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
[15]	Heyvaert, L., Maekelberghe, C., Buyle, A. (2019). Nominal and verbal gerunds in present-day English: aspectual features and nominal status. Language Sciences 73, 32-49.
[16]	Hideki Kishimoto. (2006). Japanese syntactic nominalization and VP-internal syntax. Lingua (116), 771-810.
[17]	Hopper, P. J., Traugott, E. C. (1993/2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[18]	Hou Wanzhuang. (1980). Guangyu mengguyu zhucong fuheju congju de huafen wenti (The problem of the division of the Mongolian compound sentences). Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages) 1, 62-65.
[19]	Hsiao, S. Y., (2012). The nominative / genitive alternation modern inner Mongolian relative clause: a statistical perspective. Linguistic Research (29) 2, 351-380.
[20]	Hu, Zhuanglin. (2014). Xitong gongneng yuyanxue de renzhiguan (The cognitive perspective of SF linguistics). Waiyu Xuekan (Foreign Language Research) 3, 44-50.
[21]	Kornfilt, J. (2003). Subject case in Turkish nominalized clauses. In: Junghanns, U., Szucsich, L. (Eds.), Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 129–215.
[22]	Kornfilt, J., Whitman, J. (2011). Afterword, nominalization in syntactic theory. Lingua (121), 1297-1313.
[23]	Langacker, R. W. (1977). Syntactic Reanalysis. In: Li, C. N., Austin (Eds.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. University of Texas Press, pp. 59-139.
[24]	Liu, Chengyu. (2003). yufa yinyude wenti jiazhi (The stylistic value of grammatical metaphor). Xiandai Waiyu (Modern Foreigh Languages) 2, 120-127.
[25]	Lu, Shuo, Pan Haihua. (2013). cong yinghan bijiao kan hanyude mingwuhua jiegou (Chinese Gerundives Structures from a Perspective of Chinese-English Comparative Study). Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu (Foreign Language Teaching and Research) 5, 643-798.
[26]	Luvsangwangdan. (1961). Lun mengguyu de fuheju (On Mongolian compound sentences). Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) (Journal of Peking University ) 1, 39-48.
[27]	Martin, H. (2006). A Corpus-based Analysis of Context Effects on Metaphor Comprehension. In: Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, S. (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 214-236.
[28]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo, International Language Sciences Publishers.
[29]	Michaelis, L., 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15, 1-67.
[30]	Poppe, N. (1964). Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz.
[31]	Qinggertei. (1991). Mengguyu yufa (A grammar of the Mongolian language). Huhehot, Neimenggu Renmin Chubanshe (Huhehot, Inner Mongolia People Press).
[32]	Shen, Jiaxuan. (1994). “Yufahua” yanjiu zongguan (A survey of studies on grammaticalization). Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu (Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research) 4, 17-24.
[33]	Tang, Qingye. (2004). Gongneng yu renzhi yanjiu de xinfazhan — “tongguo yiyi shijie jingyan, jiyu yuyan de renzhi yanjiu” pingjie (New developments in the study of function and cognition - review on construing experience through meaning, a language-based approach to cognition). Waiguoyu (Journal of Foreign Languages) 2, 73-78.
[34]	Te, Tuke. (1999). Mengguyu juzi jiegou xitong (The Mongolian sentence structure system). Minzu Yuwen (Minority Languages of China) 5, 31-36.
[35]	Thompson, G. (2004.) Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London, Arnold.
[36]	Todd, Cornell. (1998). Mengguyu de budingshi dongci (The Mongolian infinitive verbs). Neimenggu Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Inner Mongolia University ) 3, 109-112.
[37]	Wang, Yin, Yan, Chensong. (2005). Yufahua de tezheng, dongyin he Jizhi, renzhi yuyanxue shiye zhong de yufahua yanjiu (Grammaticalization: Characteristics, Motivations and Mechanisms). Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages) 4, 1-5, 68.
[38]	Yang, Zhou, Xiong, Zhongru. (2021). mingwuhuade jufa fenceng yu “NP de VP” jiegou (The syntactic stratification of nominalizations and the “NP de VP” construction). Xiandai Waiyu (Modern Foreign Languages) 4, 470-482.
[39]	Zhang, Dongbing. (2021). The nominal group in Khorchin Mongolian: A Systemic Functional Perspective. Word 3, 350-386.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lei Huang, Chengyu Liu. (2022). A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lei Huang; Chengyu Liu. A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(2), 132-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lei Huang, Chengyu Liu. A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(2):132-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20,
  author = {Lei Huang and Chengyu Liu},
  title = {A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {132-142},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221002.20},
  abstract = {Verbal nominals in traditional descriptions of Mongolian are described in terms of their morphological properties or meanings. They are assumed to act either as subordinate clauses, gerunds or infinitives like those in English. However, there is no a clear and reasonable explanation as to how the nominalized structures with the presence of verbal nominal change from process to thing. This paper, on the other hand, recognizes the Mongolian verbal nominal as syntactic nominalization from the functional and cognitive perspectives, which can be further divided into nominative case-marked subject nominalization, genitive case-marked subject nominalization and subject-missing nominalization. The paper proposes a generative framework for the syntactic nominalization in which the clause with verbal nominal is rank-shifted into a nominal expression by packaging the encoded information, and consequently while the verbal nominal suffix is reanalyzed as a nominalized element of the whole phrase or clause, the dynamic process of the clause is reanalyzed as a static event, and then the lexical and structural meanings of the embedded clause are re-matched via coercion. The functional and cognitive description presented in this paper provides a functionally and cognitively motivated interpretation of the generation mechanism of the syntactic nominalization in Mongolian and the interactions between the levels of lexicogrammar and semantics.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian
AU  - Lei Huang
AU  - Chengyu Liu
Y1  - 2022/04/20
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 132
EP  - 142
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
AB  - Verbal nominals in traditional descriptions of Mongolian are described in terms of their morphological properties or meanings. They are assumed to act either as subordinate clauses, gerunds or infinitives like those in English. However, there is no a clear and reasonable explanation as to how the nominalized structures with the presence of verbal nominal change from process to thing. This paper, on the other hand, recognizes the Mongolian verbal nominal as syntactic nominalization from the functional and cognitive perspectives, which can be further divided into nominative case-marked subject nominalization, genitive case-marked subject nominalization and subject-missing nominalization. The paper proposes a generative framework for the syntactic nominalization in which the clause with verbal nominal is rank-shifted into a nominal expression by packaging the encoded information, and consequently while the verbal nominal suffix is reanalyzed as a nominalized element of the whole phrase or clause, the dynamic process of the clause is reanalyzed as a static event, and then the lexical and structural meanings of the embedded clause are re-matched via coercion. The functional and cognitive description presented in this paper provides a functionally and cognitively motivated interpretation of the generation mechanism of the syntactic nominalization in Mongolian and the interactions between the levels of lexicogrammar and semantics.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lei Huang

College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
Chengyu Liu

College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lei Huang, Chengyu Liu. (2022). A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lei Huang; Chengyu Liu. A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(2), 132-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lei Huang, Chengyu Liu. A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(2):132-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20,
  author = {Lei Huang and Chengyu Liu},
  title = {A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {132-142},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221002.20},
  abstract = {Verbal nominals in traditional descriptions of Mongolian are described in terms of their morphological properties or meanings. They are assumed to act either as subordinate clauses, gerunds or infinitives like those in English. However, there is no a clear and reasonable explanation as to how the nominalized structures with the presence of verbal nominal change from process to thing. This paper, on the other hand, recognizes the Mongolian verbal nominal as syntactic nominalization from the functional and cognitive perspectives, which can be further divided into nominative case-marked subject nominalization, genitive case-marked subject nominalization and subject-missing nominalization. The paper proposes a generative framework for the syntactic nominalization in which the clause with verbal nominal is rank-shifted into a nominal expression by packaging the encoded information, and consequently while the verbal nominal suffix is reanalyzed as a nominalized element of the whole phrase or clause, the dynamic process of the clause is reanalyzed as a static event, and then the lexical and structural meanings of the embedded clause are re-matched via coercion. The functional and cognitive description presented in this paper provides a functionally and cognitively motivated interpretation of the generation mechanism of the syntactic nominalization in Mongolian and the interactions between the levels of lexicogrammar and semantics.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Functional-Cognitive Interpretation of Syntactic Nominalization in Modern Written Mongolian
AU  - Lei Huang
AU  - Chengyu Liu
Y1  - 2022/04/20
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 132
EP  - 142
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.20
AB  - Verbal nominals in traditional descriptions of Mongolian are described in terms of their morphological properties or meanings. They are assumed to act either as subordinate clauses, gerunds or infinitives like those in English. However, there is no a clear and reasonable explanation as to how the nominalized structures with the presence of verbal nominal change from process to thing. This paper, on the other hand, recognizes the Mongolian verbal nominal as syntactic nominalization from the functional and cognitive perspectives, which can be further divided into nominative case-marked subject nominalization, genitive case-marked subject nominalization and subject-missing nominalization. The paper proposes a generative framework for the syntactic nominalization in which the clause with verbal nominal is rank-shifted into a nominal expression by packaging the encoded information, and consequently while the verbal nominal suffix is reanalyzed as a nominalized element of the whole phrase or clause, the dynamic process of the clause is reanalyzed as a static event, and then the lexical and structural meanings of the embedded clause are re-matched via coercion. The functional and cognitive description presented in this paper provides a functionally and cognitively motivated interpretation of the generation mechanism of the syntactic nominalization in Mongolian and the interactions between the levels of lexicogrammar and semantics.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download