With the development of the mobile Internet, people are overwhelmed with the upgrading of social media platforms and functions. This undoubtedly provides users with multiple and open access to interaction, infiltrates new ways of social networking. This important change not only presents considerable opportunities for the new age society but also creates the “perfect platform” for the struggle for social media discourse transferred from offline. However, how this transfer can further exert the discourse struggle of social communication media while continuing the previous social interaction needs to be reconsidered. The process of intensive interaction between social media and social development strengthens the possibility of traditional discursive struggle. This also shows that although the forms of social interaction have changed, they have not changed the basic reality of human social interaction. This interactive process of discourse and struggle that occurs in social interaction continues to deepen, evolve, continue and reconstruct the discursive struggle. If we take Habermas’ theory of communicative action as the discursive framework, and take the discursive struggle in social media as the communicative variable in the “public sphere”, then we can find that the key factors that affect the emergence and evolution of discursive struggle are relative to the model that the “ego” integrates into social media for his or her discursive struggle.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14 |
Page(s) | 192-196 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Social Media, Discursive Struggle, Habermas, Communicative Rationality
[1] | Nicholas Negroponte: Being Digital [M]. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1995. |
[2] | Peng Lan. Introduction to New Media [M]. Beijing: higher Education Press. |
[3] | David Inglis. (2005). Culture and Everyday Life, London: Routledge: 5. |
[4] | Jürgen Habermas (1979). Communication and Evolution of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press: 136. |
[5] | Jürgen Habermas (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press: 295, 295, 86. |
[6] | Jürgen Habermas (1992). Postmetaphysical Thinkin, translated by William Mark Hohengarten, MIT Press: 117. |
[7] | Wolfgang Donsbach, Charles T. Salmon, Yariv Tsfati (eds.) (2014), The Spiral of Silence, Routledge: 9. |
[8] | Zhang Panpan, Characteristics of online protest discourse during the COVID-19 epidemic Young Reporter, 2020 (11): 27-28. |
[9] | Susan Sontag, AIDS and Its Metaphors [M], Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989. |
[10] | Susan Sontag (1989), AIDS and Its Metaphors, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux: 85. |
[11] | James W. Carey (1992), Communication as Culture, Routledge, London: 35. |
[12] | Mark Poster (2010), What’s the Matter with the Internet? Minnesota: Minnesota Press: 97. |
[13] | Dang Jingpeng, A Microscopic Investigation of the Localization Process of Foreign Words, Contemporary Rhetoric, 2017 (04): 76-86. |
[14] | Marshall McLuhan: Understanding Media, New York: McGraw Hill Education: 6. |
[15] | Charles Horton Cooley, Human Nature and Social Order. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers: 62. |
[16] | Ou Xiaojing, The Structure, Social Risk and Its Guidance of "Buddhist" Youth Subculture, Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition) 2021 (03): 97-104. |
APA Style
Xu Haili. (2022). Discursive Struggle in Social Media from the Perspective of Theory of Communicative Action. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(3), 192-196. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14
ACS Style
Xu Haili. Discursive Struggle in Social Media from the Perspective of Theory of Communicative Action. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(3), 192-196. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14, author = {Xu Haili}, title = {Discursive Struggle in Social Media from the Perspective of Theory of Communicative Action}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {192-196}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221003.14}, abstract = {With the development of the mobile Internet, people are overwhelmed with the upgrading of social media platforms and functions. This undoubtedly provides users with multiple and open access to interaction, infiltrates new ways of social networking. This important change not only presents considerable opportunities for the new age society but also creates the “perfect platform” for the struggle for social media discourse transferred from offline. However, how this transfer can further exert the discourse struggle of social communication media while continuing the previous social interaction needs to be reconsidered. The process of intensive interaction between social media and social development strengthens the possibility of traditional discursive struggle. This also shows that although the forms of social interaction have changed, they have not changed the basic reality of human social interaction. This interactive process of discourse and struggle that occurs in social interaction continues to deepen, evolve, continue and reconstruct the discursive struggle. If we take Habermas’ theory of communicative action as the discursive framework, and take the discursive struggle in social media as the communicative variable in the “public sphere”, then we can find that the key factors that affect the emergence and evolution of discursive struggle are relative to the model that the “ego” integrates into social media for his or her discursive struggle.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Discursive Struggle in Social Media from the Perspective of Theory of Communicative Action AU - Xu Haili Y1 - 2022/05/12 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 192 EP - 196 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221003.14 AB - With the development of the mobile Internet, people are overwhelmed with the upgrading of social media platforms and functions. This undoubtedly provides users with multiple and open access to interaction, infiltrates new ways of social networking. This important change not only presents considerable opportunities for the new age society but also creates the “perfect platform” for the struggle for social media discourse transferred from offline. However, how this transfer can further exert the discourse struggle of social communication media while continuing the previous social interaction needs to be reconsidered. The process of intensive interaction between social media and social development strengthens the possibility of traditional discursive struggle. This also shows that although the forms of social interaction have changed, they have not changed the basic reality of human social interaction. This interactive process of discourse and struggle that occurs in social interaction continues to deepen, evolve, continue and reconstruct the discursive struggle. If we take Habermas’ theory of communicative action as the discursive framework, and take the discursive struggle in social media as the communicative variable in the “public sphere”, then we can find that the key factors that affect the emergence and evolution of discursive struggle are relative to the model that the “ego” integrates into social media for his or her discursive struggle. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -