Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015

Li Mingjie; Hua Mingcun

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015

Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun

Published in International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis (Volume 4, Issue 3)

Received: 22 August 2018 Accepted: 19 September 2018 Published: 8 October 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.

Published in	International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis (Volume 4, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
Page(s)	108-117
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chaser, Detection, Universal Tool Maker's Microscope

References

[1]	Hu Min, Cheng Fei Yue. Several methods for evaluating straightness error [J]. Modern measurement and laboratory management, 2006, 5: 26-27.
[2]	Chen Shanyuan, Shen Biao, Zhu Qiang. The causes of burning, loosening and breaking of graphite electrode-joint connection and their solutions were discussed from the point of view of mechanical processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2002(6):44-46.
[3]	Suo Yuanping, Cui Zhenhua. Analysis of the factors influencing the quality of graphite electrode and joint processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2005(2): 43-45.
[4]	Cai Anjiang, design of thread chaser, [J]. tool technology, 1998, (32).
[5]	Zhu Wangquan. Special comb cutter design [J]. solution, 2010, (8).
[6]	Song Bing, Wang Longmei. Parametric Application of Thread Card Processing Procedure [J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2010 (6).
[7]	Chen Dehong, Hu Rongsheng, Yin Guomao. Research and application of casing thread comb [J]. Cemented carbide, 1999 (1): 29-33.
[8]	Lin Chengsen, numerical method. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. P83, 84.
[9]	Hou Xuezhi, digital image cutter measuring machine, 2004. 02. P2, 8, 9.
[10]	Tong Fangsen, carbon materials production Q & a [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1991.
[11]	Tang Zongjun, foundation of mechanical manufacturing [M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. (2018). Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 4(3), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Mingjie; Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int. J. Sci. Qual. Anal. 2018, 4(3), 108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int J Sci Qual Anal. 2018;4(3):108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17,
  author = {Li Mingjie and Hua Mingcun},
  title = {Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015},
  journal = {International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis},
  volume = {4},
  number = {3},
  pages = {108-117},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  abstract = {Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015
AU  - Li Mingjie
AU  - Hua Mingcun
Y1  - 2018/10/08
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
T2  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
SP  - 108
EP  - 117
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8164
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
AB  - Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Li Mingjie

Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Hua Mingcun

Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. (2018). Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 4(3), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Mingjie; Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int. J. Sci. Qual. Anal. 2018, 4(3), 108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int J Sci Qual Anal. 2018;4(3):108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17,
  author = {Li Mingjie and Hua Mingcun},
  title = {Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015},
  journal = {International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis},
  volume = {4},
  number = {3},
  pages = {108-117},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
  abstract = {Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015
AU  - Li Mingjie
AU  - Hua Mingcun
Y1  - 2018/10/08
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
T2  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
SP  - 108
EP  - 117
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8164
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
AB  - Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download