Uganda’s progress towards achieving sustainable growth is curtailed by poor and limited infrastructure, over 60% of the urban population live in slums with poor quality housing and hygiene, 44% of the households sleep in one room, the situation is more critical in Kampala where about 70% sleep in one room. About 67% of Ugandans live in dwellings with brick walls while 28% live in dwellings of mud walls reinforced with timber poles. Over 90% of framed structure in Uganda are built from reinforced concrete structures with bricks or block infill walls that are heavy thus influencing the type and size of structural members hence its cost. This research focused on use of Rice Husks (RH) and Rice Straws (RS) in lightweight fibrecrete blocks for benefit of their reduced weight, reducing environmental pollution, low processing energy, and availability at modest cost. In this research, the fibres were alkali-treated using sodium hydroxide solution prepared by dissolving 15g of sodium hydroxide pellets in 1 liter of water heated at 100°C for 60 minutes. This was aimed at increasing surface roughness, expose cellulose to fibre surface, improve fibre/matrix adhesion, eliminate weak boundary layers and remove superficial lignin layer. The alkali treated fibres were used to prepare one hundred twenty one (121) fibrecrete blocks of RH and RS with varying proportions of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% fibre and tested for their density, compressive strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, fire resistances and microstructure. The densities of lightweight fibrecrete blocks ranged between 1947-1485kg/m3 with a reduction of 7.9 - 30.5% compared to aggregate blocks of 2138kg/m3 density. Compressive strength of the blocks varied between 1.53 - 5.36 N/mm2 and 1.28 - 3.48 N/mm2 for RH and RS blocks respectively with control block having compressive strength of 7.2N/mm2 at 28 days. Compressive strength loss in the lightweight fibrecrete blocks tested for fire resistance ranged between 10.7- 34.3% and 6.8-73.7% for RH and RS-blocks respectively while the water absorption ranged between 5.8-7.8% for RH and 6.4-11.3% for RS blocks and 3.6% for aggregate blocks. Thermal conductivity was improved by 13.4-64.8%. The researcher concluded that, RH-40 and RS-20 blocks have the most appropriate proportions for lightweight fibrecrete blocks. This would reduce Environmental degradation, utilize agricultural waste, increase the income of the farmers, reduce construction cost due to reduced density of fibrecrete blocks, and increase thermal insulation hence thermal comfort of the occupants.
Published in | Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12 |
Page(s) | 135-143 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rice Husk Blocks, Rice Straw Blocks, Fibrecrete Blocks, Lightweight Blocks, Properties of Blocks
[1] | Uganda Bureau of Statistics., 2002. Uganda population and Housing Census: Analytical report: A bridged version: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. |
[2] | Uganda Bureau of Statistics., 2010. Statistical abstract: Analytical report: A bridged version: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. |
[3] | Malik, K., 2014. Human development report: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience, New York: United Nations Development Programme. |
[4] | Alinaitwe, H., Mwakali, J., Hansson, B., 2006. Assessing the degree of industrialisation in construction – A case of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol XII (3), pp. 221-229. |
[5] | Uganda Bureau of Statistics., 2017. Statistical abstract: Analytical report: A bridged version: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. |
[6] | Mishra, S. & Usmani, J., 2013. Comparison of embodied energy in different masonry wall materials. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 4 (4), pp. 90-92. |
[7] | Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development., 2016: Sector Perfomance Report of Lands, Housing and Urban Development: financial year 2014-2015 report. |
[8] | Pérez-Peña, A., 2009. Interlocking Stabilised Soil Blocks: Appropriate Earth Technologies in Uganda,: UN-HABITAT. |
[9] | Nationsl Environmental Management Authority., 2008. National implementation plan of stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants for Uganda. |
[10] | Mostafa., M. & Uddin, N., 2015. Effect of banana fibers on the compressive and flexural strength of compressed earth blocks. Buildings, 5 (1), pp. 282-296. |
[11] | UN-HABITAT., 2012., United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat) -Annually Report. |
[12] | Danso, H., Martinson, D., Ali, M. & William., 2015. Effect of fibre aspect ratio on mechanical properties of soil building. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 83, pp. 314-319. |
[13] | Madurwar., 2013. Application of agro-waste for sustainable construction materials. A review Construction and Building Materials., Volume 38, pp. 872-878. |
[14] | Gunduz., 2007. use of quartet blend containing fly ash, scoria, perlitic pumice and cement to produce cellular hollow light weight mosonry blocks for non load bearing walls. construction and building materials, 22 (5), pp. 747-754. |
[15] | Amato, G; Cambione, G; Cavaleri, L; Minato, G; Miraghi, N., 2011. The use of pumice light weight concrete for masonry application. |
[16] | Hashemi, A., Cruickshank, H., Cheshmehzangi, A., 2015. Environmental impacts and embodied energy of construction methods and materials in low-income tropical housing. Sustainability, 7 (6), pp. 7866-7883. |
[17] | Uganda Bureau of Statistics., 2019. Statistical abstract: Analytical report: A bridged version: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. |
[18] | Pacheco-Torgal, F. & Jalali, S., 2011a. Cementitious building materials reinforced with vegetable fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (2), pp. 575-581. |
[19] | Girijappa, Y., Gowda, T., Suchart, S. & Rangappa, S. M., 2019. Natural Fibers as Sustainable and Renewable Resource for Development of Eco-Friendly Composites. Comprehensive Review., 6 (22). |
[20] | Ajouguim, Soukaina; Stefanidoub, Maria; Abdelouahdi, Karima; Waqif, Mohamed; Latifa, Saâdi., 2020. Influence of treated bio-fibers on the mechanical and physical properties of cement mortars. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. |
[21] | Susheel, K., Kaith, B. & Kaur, I., 2009. Pretreatments of Natural Fibers and their Application as Reinforcing Material in Polymer Composites -A Review. |
[22] | Santos, S. F. D; Tonoli, G, H, D; Mejia, J, E, B; Fiorelli, J; Savastano Jr, H., 2015. Non-conventional cement-based composites reinforced with vegetable fibers. A review of strategies to improve durability. Materials of Construction, 65 (317), p. 041. |
[23] | Wang, B., Panigrahi, S., Tabil, L. & Crerar, A., 2007. Pre-treatment of Flax Fibers for use in Rotationally Molded Biocomposites. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 26 (5). |
[24] | Onuaguluchi, O. & Banthia, N., 2016. Plant-based natural fibre reinforced cement composites: A review. Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 68, pp. 96-108. |
[25] | Parveen, S., Rana, S. & Fangueiro, R., 2017. Macro- and nanodimensional plant fiber reinforcements for cementitious composites. Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites, pp. 343-382. |
[26] | Kabir, M., Wang, H. & Aravinthan, T., 2011. Effects of natural fibre surface on composite properties. A review. Proceedings of the 1st international post graduare conference on engineering, designing and developing the built environment for sustainable well being (eddBE2011); pp. 94-99. |
[27] | Bachir, T. & Abdelhamid, G., 2016. The mechanical and physical properties of compressed earth block stabilized with lime and filled with untreated and alkali-treated date palm fibers. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 104, p. 52–62. |
[28] | Hashim, Mohd Yussni, Azriszul, Mohd Amin; Faizan Marwah, Omar Mohd; Mohd Hilmi, Othman; Mohd Radzi, Moham., 2017. The effect of alkali treatment under various conditions on physical properties of kenaf fiber., IOP Publishing Ltd. |
[29] | Ajouguim, Soukaina; Abdelouahdi, Karima; Waqif, Mohamed; Maria, Stefanidou; Latifa, Saadi., 2019. Modifications of Alfa fibers by alkali and hydrothermal treatment. Cellulose, 26, pp. 1503-1516. |
[30] | Machaka, M., Basha, H., Chakra, H. A. & Elkordi, A., 2014. Alkali treatment of fan palm natural fibre for use in fibre reinforced concrete. European Scientific Journal, 10 (12), pp. 186-195. |
[31] | Sedan, D., Pagnoux, C., Smith, A. & Chotard, T., 2008. Mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced cement: Influence of the fibre/matrix interaction. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 28 (1), pp. 183-192. |
[32] | Akil, H., Omar, H., Mazuki, M. F., Safiee, A., 2011. Kenaf fiber reinforced composites:. A review. materials & design, 32 (8-9), pp. 4107-4121. |
[33] | Zhang, Y., Ghaly, A., Bingxi, L., 2012. Physical properties of rice residues as affected by variety and climatic and cultivation conditions in three continents. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9 (11), pp. 1757-1768. |
APA Style
Abaza Leo, Kyakula Michael. (2021). Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 6(5), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12
ACS Style
Abaza Leo; Kyakula Michael. Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2021, 6(5), 135-143. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12
AMA Style
Abaza Leo, Kyakula Michael. Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2021;6(5):135-143. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12
@article{10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12, author = {Abaza Leo and Kyakula Michael}, title = {Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks}, journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {5}, pages = {135-143}, doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20210605.12}, abstract = {Uganda’s progress towards achieving sustainable growth is curtailed by poor and limited infrastructure, over 60% of the urban population live in slums with poor quality housing and hygiene, 44% of the households sleep in one room, the situation is more critical in Kampala where about 70% sleep in one room. About 67% of Ugandans live in dwellings with brick walls while 28% live in dwellings of mud walls reinforced with timber poles. Over 90% of framed structure in Uganda are built from reinforced concrete structures with bricks or block infill walls that are heavy thus influencing the type and size of structural members hence its cost. This research focused on use of Rice Husks (RH) and Rice Straws (RS) in lightweight fibrecrete blocks for benefit of their reduced weight, reducing environmental pollution, low processing energy, and availability at modest cost. In this research, the fibres were alkali-treated using sodium hydroxide solution prepared by dissolving 15g of sodium hydroxide pellets in 1 liter of water heated at 100°C for 60 minutes. This was aimed at increasing surface roughness, expose cellulose to fibre surface, improve fibre/matrix adhesion, eliminate weak boundary layers and remove superficial lignin layer. The alkali treated fibres were used to prepare one hundred twenty one (121) fibrecrete blocks of RH and RS with varying proportions of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% fibre and tested for their density, compressive strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, fire resistances and microstructure. The densities of lightweight fibrecrete blocks ranged between 1947-1485kg/m3 with a reduction of 7.9 - 30.5% compared to aggregate blocks of 2138kg/m3 density. Compressive strength of the blocks varied between 1.53 - 5.36 N/mm2 and 1.28 - 3.48 N/mm2 for RH and RS blocks respectively with control block having compressive strength of 7.2N/mm2 at 28 days. Compressive strength loss in the lightweight fibrecrete blocks tested for fire resistance ranged between 10.7- 34.3% and 6.8-73.7% for RH and RS-blocks respectively while the water absorption ranged between 5.8-7.8% for RH and 6.4-11.3% for RS blocks and 3.6% for aggregate blocks. Thermal conductivity was improved by 13.4-64.8%. The researcher concluded that, RH-40 and RS-20 blocks have the most appropriate proportions for lightweight fibrecrete blocks. This would reduce Environmental degradation, utilize agricultural waste, increase the income of the farmers, reduce construction cost due to reduced density of fibrecrete blocks, and increase thermal insulation hence thermal comfort of the occupants.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Investigation of the Effects of Rice Husk and Rice Straw on the Properties of Lightweight Fibrecrete Blocks AU - Abaza Leo AU - Kyakula Michael Y1 - 2021/10/28 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12 T2 - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JF - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JO - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering SP - 135 EP - 143 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210605.12 AB - Uganda’s progress towards achieving sustainable growth is curtailed by poor and limited infrastructure, over 60% of the urban population live in slums with poor quality housing and hygiene, 44% of the households sleep in one room, the situation is more critical in Kampala where about 70% sleep in one room. About 67% of Ugandans live in dwellings with brick walls while 28% live in dwellings of mud walls reinforced with timber poles. Over 90% of framed structure in Uganda are built from reinforced concrete structures with bricks or block infill walls that are heavy thus influencing the type and size of structural members hence its cost. This research focused on use of Rice Husks (RH) and Rice Straws (RS) in lightweight fibrecrete blocks for benefit of their reduced weight, reducing environmental pollution, low processing energy, and availability at modest cost. In this research, the fibres were alkali-treated using sodium hydroxide solution prepared by dissolving 15g of sodium hydroxide pellets in 1 liter of water heated at 100°C for 60 minutes. This was aimed at increasing surface roughness, expose cellulose to fibre surface, improve fibre/matrix adhesion, eliminate weak boundary layers and remove superficial lignin layer. The alkali treated fibres were used to prepare one hundred twenty one (121) fibrecrete blocks of RH and RS with varying proportions of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% fibre and tested for their density, compressive strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, fire resistances and microstructure. The densities of lightweight fibrecrete blocks ranged between 1947-1485kg/m3 with a reduction of 7.9 - 30.5% compared to aggregate blocks of 2138kg/m3 density. Compressive strength of the blocks varied between 1.53 - 5.36 N/mm2 and 1.28 - 3.48 N/mm2 for RH and RS blocks respectively with control block having compressive strength of 7.2N/mm2 at 28 days. Compressive strength loss in the lightweight fibrecrete blocks tested for fire resistance ranged between 10.7- 34.3% and 6.8-73.7% for RH and RS-blocks respectively while the water absorption ranged between 5.8-7.8% for RH and 6.4-11.3% for RS blocks and 3.6% for aggregate blocks. Thermal conductivity was improved by 13.4-64.8%. The researcher concluded that, RH-40 and RS-20 blocks have the most appropriate proportions for lightweight fibrecrete blocks. This would reduce Environmental degradation, utilize agricultural waste, increase the income of the farmers, reduce construction cost due to reduced density of fibrecrete blocks, and increase thermal insulation hence thermal comfort of the occupants. VL - 6 IS - 5 ER -