Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively，the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.
| Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15 |
| Page(s) | 67-70 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Colpo-uterine Suspension, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Laparoscopic, Erosion, Sexually Active
| [1] | Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1396-1403. |
| [2] | Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013; 120: 152-60. |
| [3] | Digesu G, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005: 112: 971-976. |
| [4] | Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu KW, et al. Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women's treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 1027-33. |
| [5] | Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 755 e751-27. |
| [6] | Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1873-6. |
| [7] | Withagen, M. I., Milani, A. L., den Boon, J. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117, 242-50. |
| [8] | Sivaslioglu, A. A., Unlubilgin, E., Dolen, I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19, 467-71. |
| [9] | Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10-7. |
| [10] | Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu AK, et al. Chinese validation of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1305-12. |
| [11] | Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, Yang X, Lu Y, Lang J. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 116 (2): 117-9. |
| [12] | Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 372-377. |
| [13] | Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Zhao Zhao. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2015; 188: 74-78. |
| [14] | Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 360. e1-360.e7. |
| [15] | Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, et al. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 242-250. |
| [16] | de Landsheere, L. Changes in elastin density in different locations of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25, 1673-1681. |
| [17] | Vollebregt, A., Fischer, K., Gietelink, D. et al. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 2011; 118, 1518-27. |
| [18] | Nieminen, K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203, e1-8. |
| [19] | F. CECI, E. SPAZIANI, S. CORELLI, et al. Technique and outcomes about a new laparoscopic procedure: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (POPS). G Chir 2013; 34: 141-144. |
| [20] | Bousserghine Y, Droupy S, Wagner L, et al. Denovo stress urinary incontinence following sacral colpopexy. Prog Urol 2011; 21: 631-5. |
| [21] | Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, et al. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 367-373. |
APA Style
Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhang. (2018). Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 6(3), 67-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
ACS Style
Shunshuang Li; Mei Ji; Xianlan Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang. Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018, 6(3), 67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
AMA Style
Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhang. Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension. J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;6(3):67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15,
author = {Shunshuang Li and Mei Ji and Xianlan Zhao and Xiaoyan Zhang},
title = {Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension},
journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
volume = {6},
number = {3},
pages = {67-70},
doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20180603.15},
abstract = {Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively，the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension AU - Shunshuang Li AU - Mei Ji AU - Xianlan Zhao AU - Xiaoyan Zhang Y1 - 2018/06/28 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 67 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15 AB - Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively，the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: