Objective: to evaluate influence of care nursing measure on induced abortion patients. Methods: we screened 100 suitable patients to join our study, who were undergoing induced abortion, their information was collected from March 2016 to October 2019. The patients who their age was between 20 and 45 years were randomly assigned to intervention group and a control group. For the two groups, we use the different nursing measure for the patients of different group. In nursing process, we collected their data of anxiety and depression by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we use interview to collect the status of contraception awareness and contraceptive use. Result: the patients of intervention group had better mental health than patients of control group, that the intervention group had bigger change (48.75±9.17 vs 40.13±7.87, 49.82±9.62 vs 38.74±7.14). For contraception awareness, the result of intervention group is obviously better than that of control group (94.23±3.68 vs 81.93±5.13). The patients still had repeated abortion during follow-up, but patients of intervention group had less repeated abortion status than the control group [5 (10%) vs 1 (2%)]. However, the intervention group had higher contraceptive use rate from our research [28 (56%) vs 46 (92%)]. Conclusion: the care nursing measure had better influence in mental health of induced abortion patient and wonderful effect at precaution consciousness of repeated induced abortion.
| Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18 |
| Page(s) | 32-34 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nursing, Induced Abortion, Repeated Abortion
| [1] | Fagley R: The Population Explosion and Christian Responsibility. New York, Oxford University Press. 2016: 164-166. |
| [2] | Direkvand-Moghadam, Ashraf, Sayehmiri K, Delpisheh A, Direkvand-Moghadam A. The global trend of infertility: an original review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. Res. 2014; 1: 35–43. |
| [3] | Dastgiri S, Yoosefian M, Garjani M, Kalankesh LR. Induced abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mater. Socio-Medica. 2017; 29: 58–67. |
| [4] | Part K, Moreau C, Donati S, et al: Teenage pregnancies in the European Union in the context of legislation and youth sexual and reproductive health services. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 92: 1395. |
| [5] | Singh S, Darroch JE: Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. 2017; 32: 14. |
| [6] | Graham ML, Hill E, Shelley JM, Taket AR. An examination of the health and wellbeing of childless women: a cross-sectional exploratory study in American. BMC Womens Health. 2011; 11: 47. |
| [7] | Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet 2016; 388 (10041): 258–67. |
| [8] | Jatlaoui TC, Ewing A, Mandel MG, Simmons KB, Suchdev DB, Jamieson DJ, et al. Abortion surveillance - United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016; 65 (12): 1–44. |
| [9] | Mota NP, Burnett M, Sareen J. Associations between abortion, mental disorders, and suicidal behaviour in a nationally representative sample. Can. J. Psychiatry Rev. Can. Psychiatr. 2015; 55: 239–247. |
| [10] | Lamina MA. Prevalence of abortion and contraceptive practice among women seeking repeat induced abortion in Western Nigeria. J Pregnancy. 2015; 15: 486203. |
| [11] | Steinberg JR. McCulloch CE. Adler NE. Abortion and mental health: findings from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123: 263–270. |
| [12] | Magnusson BM, Masho SW, Lapane KL. Early age at first intercourse and subsequent gaps in contraceptive use. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015; 21 (1): 73–9. |
| [13] | White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454. |
| [14] | El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688. |
| [15] | McPherson R., Frohlich J., Fodor G., Genest J., Canadian cardiovascular society position statement e recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease, Can. J. Cardiol. 2006; (22): 913–927. |
| [16] | Department of Health of UK. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales; 2017. |
| [17] | Dagklis T, Tsakiridis I, Chouliara F, et al: Antenatal depression among women hospitalized due to threatened preterm labor in a high-risk pregnancy unit in Greece. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 919. |
APA Style
Jiaona Tang, Xinke Huang, Hong Zhou, Xiaojuan Liao. (2020). Assessing Care Nursing Measure for Patients of Induced Abortion. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 8(1), 32-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18
ACS Style
Jiaona Tang; Xinke Huang; Hong Zhou; Xiaojuan Liao. Assessing Care Nursing Measure for Patients of Induced Abortion. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 8(1), 32-34. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18
AMA Style
Jiaona Tang, Xinke Huang, Hong Zhou, Xiaojuan Liao. Assessing Care Nursing Measure for Patients of Induced Abortion. J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;8(1):32-34. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18,
author = {Jiaona Tang and Xinke Huang and Hong Zhou and Xiaojuan Liao},
title = {Assessing Care Nursing Measure for Patients of Induced Abortion},
journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {32-34},
doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20200801.18},
abstract = {Objective: to evaluate influence of care nursing measure on induced abortion patients. Methods: we screened 100 suitable patients to join our study, who were undergoing induced abortion, their information was collected from March 2016 to October 2019. The patients who their age was between 20 and 45 years were randomly assigned to intervention group and a control group. For the two groups, we use the different nursing measure for the patients of different group. In nursing process, we collected their data of anxiety and depression by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we use interview to collect the status of contraception awareness and contraceptive use. Result: the patients of intervention group had better mental health than patients of control group, that the intervention group had bigger change (48.75±9.17 vs 40.13±7.87, 49.82±9.62 vs 38.74±7.14). For contraception awareness, the result of intervention group is obviously better than that of control group (94.23±3.68 vs 81.93±5.13). The patients still had repeated abortion during follow-up, but patients of intervention group had less repeated abortion status than the control group [5 (10%) vs 1 (2%)]. However, the intervention group had higher contraceptive use rate from our research [28 (56%) vs 46 (92%)]. Conclusion: the care nursing measure had better influence in mental health of induced abortion patient and wonderful effect at precaution consciousness of repeated induced abortion.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing Care Nursing Measure for Patients of Induced Abortion AU - Jiaona Tang AU - Xinke Huang AU - Hong Zhou AU - Xiaojuan Liao Y1 - 2020/03/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 32 EP - 34 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200801.18 AB - Objective: to evaluate influence of care nursing measure on induced abortion patients. Methods: we screened 100 suitable patients to join our study, who were undergoing induced abortion, their information was collected from March 2016 to October 2019. The patients who their age was between 20 and 45 years were randomly assigned to intervention group and a control group. For the two groups, we use the different nursing measure for the patients of different group. In nursing process, we collected their data of anxiety and depression by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we use interview to collect the status of contraception awareness and contraceptive use. Result: the patients of intervention group had better mental health than patients of control group, that the intervention group had bigger change (48.75±9.17 vs 40.13±7.87, 49.82±9.62 vs 38.74±7.14). For contraception awareness, the result of intervention group is obviously better than that of control group (94.23±3.68 vs 81.93±5.13). The patients still had repeated abortion during follow-up, but patients of intervention group had less repeated abortion status than the control group [5 (10%) vs 1 (2%)]. However, the intervention group had higher contraceptive use rate from our research [28 (56%) vs 46 (92%)]. Conclusion: the care nursing measure had better influence in mental health of induced abortion patient and wonderful effect at precaution consciousness of repeated induced abortion. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: