Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center

Received: 22 January 2024     Accepted: 2 February 2024     Published: 17 April 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes serious invasive infections in pregnant women, resulting in disseminated fetal infections, abortions, and still-births. Although it causes a greater burden on pregnant women and their infants, the case in Ethiopia is overlooked, and there is a scarcity of data on L. monocytogenes, particularly in the southern parts of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and, antibiotics susceptibility of L. monocytogenes and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending the Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 203 pregnant women between May 30 and July 30, 2022. Socio-demographic data and 5 ml venous blood samples were collected from pregnant women using structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariate logistic regression was carried out then variables with p<0.25 were further analyzed by multivariate logistic regressions, p-values <0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. Results: The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women was found to be 11/203 (5.42%; 95% CI=2.88-9.38). L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin (90.91%) and meropenem (81.82%), but susceptible to ampicillin (90.91%). Raw meat (AOR=6.99; 95% CI=1.39-35.14), p=0.018), uncooked vegetables (AOR=6.62; 95% CI=1.04-42.30), p=0.046), unpasteurized milk (AOR=7.56; 95% CI=1.33-42.97), p=0.023) and fever (AOR=14.65; 95% CI=3.15-68.15), p=0.001) were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes infection. Conclusion: L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin, meropenem, erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole but susceptible to ampicillin. Raw meat, uncooked vegetables, unpasteurized milk, and fever were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes.

Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 12, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12
Page(s) 20-30
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Antibiotics Susceptibility, Listeria monocytogenes, Pregnant Women, Prevalence, Hawassa, Ethiopia

1. Introduction
L. monocytogenes (LM) is a facultative intracellular gram-positive rod which causes listeriosis in both humans and vertebrates. It is the primary pathogen, while L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. grayi, and L. innocua are less medically important . It causes septicemia, meningitis, and abortion in pregnant women and morbidity of 20–30% in immunocompromised patients , with a high death rate . The World Health Organization reported that pregnancy-related listeriosis is 43% and is more likely to occur in the third trimester than in the first trimester , because successful pregnancy requires timely adaptation by the maternal immune system . The Center for Disease Control estimated 1,600 people get listeriosis annually and 260 will die . Pregnant women experience listeria infection 20-times more frequently than the general population due to pregnancy-related suppression of cell-mediated immunity and placental tropism. This encompasses fetal and neonatal listeriosis, with death rates of 25–35% and 20%, respectively . If the infection remains unrecognized, it may result in interruption of pregnancy or premature abortions . Pregnant women may exhibit flu-like fever, headache, diarrhea, myalgia, or digestive-related symptoms .
Meat and dairy products can transmit listeria to human . Approximately 99% of human listeriosis cases are transmitted by the consumption of ready-to-eat foods , which are introduced into the food chain from raw materials . It is also transmitted vertically to the fetus . It survives and replicates over a wide range of temperatures (4 - 42°C), pH, salt, and oxygen concentrations and forms biofilms, which makes elimination difficult . It can be isolated from maternal/neonatal blood, body fluid, and the placenta by growing on different culture media . A mixture of ampicillin and aminoglycoside, ampicillin and gentamicin is the current therapy of choice despite the emergence of drug-resistant strains . Although LM causes a greater burden on pregnant women and their infants, data are scarce particularly in the southern parts of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility of LM, and associated risk factors for infection among pregnant women attending the Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
2. Methodology

2.1. Study Setting

A health center-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from May 30 to July 30, 2022 at the Millennium Health Center, which is located in Hawassa 275 km from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa . The city has a population of approximately 419,655, of which 51.4% are male and 48.6% are female . The Millennium Health Center provides services for 80,074 individuals annually. The antenatal care clinic of the health center serves a mean of 30 pregnant women per day, and eight beds are available for both antenatal and postnatal services within the health center (health center- based data).

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Pregnant women aged 18-45 years who were willing to provide informed consent were included in the study, whereas pregnant women who were on antibiotic treatment 2 weeks prior to the time of data collection were excluded from the study.

2.3. Sample size Determination and Sampling Technique

A total of 206 pregnant women who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were recruited between May 30 and July 30, 2022. The participants were selected using a systematic sampling technique, and the first participant was selected using the lottery method.

2.3.1. Dependent Variable

Prevalence of L. monocytogenes.

2.3.2. Independent Variables

Socio-demographic variables and possible risk factors.

2.3.3. Co-variables

Clinical sign and symptoms.

2.4. Data and Specimen Collection

Clinical and socio-demographic data were collected using structured questionnaires after obtaining written informed consent from study participants. Venous blood (5 ml) was collected aseptically by disinfection with 70% alcohol and 2% tincture of iodine, transferred into sterile 45 ml tryptose soy broth (Oxoid, UK) with 0.6% yeast extract (TSBYE) and transported within 1h to the SNNP Regional Public Health Laboratory.

2.5. Culture and Identification

Blood culture bottles were incubated at 35°C with daily inspection for visible microbial growth for 7 days by observing visually the turbidity of broth. For blood cultures that show turbidity (microbial growth), subcultures were prepared on sheep blood agar (Oxoid, UK) and was incubated at 35°C for 24 h. L. monocytogenes typically grows as gray to white beta-hemolytic colonies on 5% sheep blood agar (Oxoid, UK). Preliminary identification of L. monocytogenes was performed using Gram staining and hemolytic patterns on 5% sheep blood agar (Oxoid, UK). For blood cultures that did not show turbidity (microbial growth), blind sub culturing was also performed on the 2nd, 5th, and 7th day of inoculation. Blood culture results with no microbial growth after 7 days were recorded as culture-negative. Suspected colonies were further identified using Catalase, and CAMP test to confirm the presence of L. monocytogenes .

2.6. Antibiotics Susceptibility Testing

The standardized disk diffusion method was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (Himedia, India) with 5% defibrinated sheep blood using an inoculum of McFarland 0.5, and was incubated at 5% CO2, 35 ± 1ºC, for 18 ± 2 h. The result was interpreted by reading the zone edges as the point showing no growth when viewed from the front of the plate with the lid removed and with reflected light. Antibiotics tested included: ampicillin (2 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), benzyl penicillin (1 unit), sulfamethoxazole (5 μg), and meropenem (10 μg). Suspended isolates were inoculated on MHA supplemented with 5% sheep blood and antibiotic discs were placed firmly and incubated at 37 oC for 24 h. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as quality control. The zone of inhibition was measured and interpreted according to CLSI 2020 and EUCAST guidelines for L. monocytogenes .

2.7. Quality Assurance

Standard operational procedures were followed and Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) was used as the reference strain. A negative control was performed by randomly taking the prepared culture media and incubating overnight to check for growth .

2.8. Data Entry and Analysis

Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi data version 4.6 and the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 25 software. Descriptive statistics and binary and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Binary logistic regression was used to show the association of each variable with the dependent variable, and p< 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval, was considered statistically significant. Bivariate logistic regression was performed, and variables with p<0.25 were further analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The results are presented in the text, tables and charts.
3. Results

3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics

A total of 206 pregnant women were included in this study, of whom 203 responded, with a response rate of 98%. The mean age of the women was 26.57 (± 6.31 SD) years. The median age of the pregnant women was 25 years (range: 18-43 years). The findings of this study showed that 91 (44.80%) of women were aged between 18 and 24 years old, 160 (78.80%) were married, 68 (33.50%) had completed secondary school, 71 (35%) were house wives, and the place of residence of the pregnant women was urban for 164 (80.80%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

Frequency

Percent (%)

Age (years)

18 – 24

91

44.8

25 – 34

72

35.5

35 – 44

40

19.7

Residence

Urban

164

80.8

Rural

39

19.2

Marital Status

Single

20

9.9

Married

160

78.8

Divorced

14

6.9

Widowed

9

4.4

Educational status

Read and Write

20

9.9

Elementary School (1 – 8)

54

26.6

Secondary School (9 – 12)

68

33.5

College/University

61

30

Occupation

Government employee

54

26.6

Merchant

38

18.7

Daily Worker

40

19.7

House Wife

71

35

3.2. Gestational Age and Frequent Food Habits

Of the study participants, 85 (41.90%), 105 (51.70%), 95 (46.80%), 78 (38.40%), and 75 (36.90%), pregnant women were in the 2nd trimester, and had frequent feeding habits of uncooked/raw fish, uncooked vegetables, unpasteurized milk, and uncooked meat, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Gestational age and frequently feeding habit of pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

Frequency

Percent (%)

Gestational age

1st trimester

41

20.2

2nd trimester

85

41.9

3rd trimester

77

37.9

Frequent eating/drinking habits

Uncooked meat

Yes

75

36.9

No

128

63.1

Uncooked/raw fish

Yes

105

51.7

No

98

48.3

Uncooked vegetables

Yes

95

46.8

No

108

53.2

Unpasteurized milk

Yes

78

38.4

No

125

61.6

3.3. Clinical Characteristics of L. monocytogenes Infection

Gastroenteritis was noted in 58 patients (28.6%), nausea/vomiting in 49 (24.1%), and headache in 42 (20.7%) (Table 3).
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of L. monocytogenes infection among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

Frequency

Percent (%)

Fever

Yes

24

11.8

No

179

88.2

Headache

Yes

42

20.7

No

161

79.3

Gastroenteritis

Yes

58

28.6

No

145

71.4

Nausea/Vomiting

Yes

49

24.1

No

154

75.9

Backache

Yes

35

17.2

No

168

82.8

Muscle pains

Yes

33

16.3

No

170

83.7

3.4. Prevalence of L. monocytogenes

The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes among the pregnant women was 11/203 (5.42%; 95% CI=2.88–9.38). The prevalence of L. monocytogenes was 8 (11.11%) in the age group 25–34 years, 1 (11.11%) in widowed, 4 (10%) in daily workers, 2 (10%) in those who could read and write, 6 (7.79%) in the third trimester, and 3 (7.69%) in rural locations of residence (Table 4).
Table 4. Bivariate analysis of socio-demographic characteristics among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

L. monocytogenes

p-value

COR (95% CI)

Positive (n=11) (%)

Negative (n=192) (%)

Age (years)

18 – 24

2 (2.20)

89 (97.80)

Ref

25 – 34

8 (11.11)

64 (88.89)

0.034*

5.56 (1.14-27.07)

35 – 44

1 (2.50)

39 (97.50)

0.915

1.14 (0.10-12.96)

Residence

Urban

8 (4.88)

156 (95.12)

Ref

Rural

3 (7.69)

36 (92.31)

0.489

1.63 (0.41-6.43)

Marital status

Single

2 (10.00)

18 (90.00)

Ref

Married

7 (4.38)

153 (95.62)

0.291

0.41 (0.08-2.14)

Divorced

1 (7.14)

13 (92.86)

0.773

0.69 (0.06-8.47)

Widowed

1 (11.11)

8 (88.89)

0.928

1.13 (0.09-14.28)

Educational status

Read and Write

2 (10.00)

18 (90.00)

0.252

3.28 (0.43-24.95)

Elementary School

3 (5.56)

51 (94.44)

0.555

1.74 (0.28-10.80)

Secondary School

4 (5.88)

64 (94.12)

0.489

1.84 (0.33-10.44)

College/University

2 (3.28)

59 (96.72)

Ref

Occupation

Government employee

2 (3.70)

52 (96.30)

Ref

Merchant

2 (5.26)

36 (94.74)

0.719

1.44 (0.19-10.73)

Daily Worker

4 (10.00)

36 (90.00)

0.235*

2.89 (0.50-16.62)

House Wife

3 (4.23)

68 (95.77)

0.883

1.15 (0.19-7.12)

COR, crude odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; (*), candidate variables for multivariable analysis at p< 0.25.

3.5. Association of Possible Risk Factors for L. monocytogenes Infection

Pregnant women who frequent consumed uncooked meat (COR=4.98; 95% CI=1.28-19.38), p= 0.021), uncooked vegetable (COR=5.55; 95% CI=1.17-26.35), p=0.031), and unpasteurized milk (COR=8.02; 95% CI=1.69-38.19), p=0.009) were 4.98-, 5.55-, and 8.02- times more at risk for L. monocytogenes infection, respectively, which was statistically significant. In contrast, gestational age (2nd trimester (COR=1.98; 95% CI=0.21-18.26), p=0.549), 3rd trimester (COR=3.38; 95% CI=0.39-29.08), p=0.267), and consumption of uncooked/raw fish (COR=1.68; 95% CI=0.48-5.92), p=0.421) were not statistically associated with L. monocytogenes infection (Table 5).
Table 5. Bivariate analysis of possible risk factors of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

L. monocytogenes

p-value

COR (95% CI)

Positive (n=11) (%)

Negative (n=192) (%)

Gestational age

1st trimester

1 (2.44)

40 (97.56)

Ref

2nd trimester

4 (4.71)

81 (95.29)

0.549

1.98 (0.21-18.26)

3rd trimester

6 (7.79)

71 (92.21)

0.267

3.38 (0.39-29.08)

Frequently feeding habit

Uncooked meat

Yes

8 (10.67)

67 (89.33)

0.021*

4.98 (1.28-19.38)

No

3 (2.34)

125 (97.66)

Ref

Uncooked/raw fish

Yes

7 (6.67)

98 (93.33)

0.421

1.68 (0.48-5.92)

No

4 (4.08)

94 (95.92)

Ref

Uncooked vegetables

Yes

9 (9.47)

86 (90.53)

0.031*

5.55 (1.17-26.35)

No

2 (1.85)

106 (98.15)

Ref

Unpasteurized milk

Yes

9 (11.54)

69 (88.46)

0.009*

8.02 (1.69-38.19)

No

2 (1.60)

123 (98.40)

Ref

COR, crude odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; (*), candidate variables for multivariable analysis at p< 0.25.

3.6. Clinical Signs and Symptoms

Fever (COR=18.02; 95% CI=4.79-67.81), p=0.001) and nausea/vomiting (COR=6.25; 95% CI=1.75-22.37), p=0.005) were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes. In contrast, headache (COR=1.47; 95% CI=0.38-5.81), p=0.581), gastroenteritis (COR=1.46; 95% CI=0.41-5.19), p=0.558), backache (COR=1.88; 95% CI=0.47-7.45), p=0.372), and muscle pains (COR=2.03; 95% CI=0.51-8.07), p=0.317) were not statistically associated with L. monocytogenes infection (Table 6).
Table 6. Bivariate analysis of clinical signs and symptoms of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

L. monocytogenes

p-value

COR (95% CI)

Positive (n=11) (%)

Negative (n=192) (%)

Fever

Yes

7 (29.17)

17 (70.83)

0.001*

18.02 (4.79-67.81)

No

4 (2.23)

175 (97.77)

Ref

Headache

Yes

3 (7.14)

39 (92.86)

0.581

1.47 (0.38-5.81)

No

8 (4.97)

153 (95.03)

Ref

Gastroenteritis

Yes

4 (6.90)

54 (93.10)

0.558

1.46 (0.41-5.19)

No

7 (4.83)

138 (95.17)

Ref

Nausea/Vomiting

Yes

7 (14.29)

42 (85.71)

0.005*

6.25 (1.75-22.37)

No

4 (2.60)

150 (97.40)

Ref

Backache

Yes

3 (8.57)

32 (91.43)

0.372

1.88 (0.47-7.45)

No

8 (4.76)

160 (95.24)

Ref

Muscle pains

Yes

3 (9.09)

30 (90.91)

0.317

2.03 (0.51-8.07)

No

8 (4.71)

162 (95.29)

Ref

COR, crude odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; (*), candidate variables for multivariable analysis at p< 0.25.
In bivariate analysis, six variables had a p-value <0.25, including the age of participants, uncooked meat, uncooked vegetables, unpasteurized milk, fever and nausea/vomiting, which fulfilled the variable screening criteria (p<0.25) and were entered into multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the multivariate analysis, uncooked meat (AOR=6.99; 95% CI=1.39-35.14), p=0.018), uncooked vegetable (AOR=6.62; 95% CI=1.04-42.30), p=0.046), unpasteurized milk (AOR=7.56; 95% CI=1.33-42.97), p=0.023) and fever (AOR=14.65; 95% CI=3.15-68.15), p=0.001) were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes infection (Table 7).
Figure 1. Antibiotics susceptibility test of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022.
Table 7. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with L. monocytogenes among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022 (n=203).

Variables

Category

L. monocytogenes

p-value

COR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

Positive (n=11) (%)

Negative (n=192) (%)

Age (years)

18 – 24

2 (2.20)

89 (97.80)

Ref

Ref

25 – 34

8 (11.11)

64 (88.89)

0.034*

5.56 (1.14-27.07)

0.141

4.40 (0.61-31.74)

35 – 44

1 (2.50)

39 (97.50)

0.915

1.14 (0.10-12.96)

0.783

1.51 (0.80-28.53)

Uncooked meat

Yes

8 (10.67)

67 (89.33)

0.021*

4.98 (1.28-19.38)

0.018**

6.99 (1.39-35.14)

No

3 (2.34)

125 (97.66)

Ref

Ref

Uncooked vegetables

Yes

9 (9.47)

86 (90.53)

0.031*

5.55 (1.17-26.35)

0.046**

6.62 (1.04-42.30)

No

2 (1.85)

106 (98.15)

Ref

Ref

Unpasteurized milk

Yes

9 (11.54)

69 (88.46)

0.009*

8.02 (1.69-38.19)

0.023**

7.56 (1.33-42.97)

No

2 (1.60)

123 (98.40)

Ref

Ref

Fever

Yes

7 (29.17)

17 (70.83)

0.001*

18.02 (4.79-67.81)

0.001**

14.65 (3.15-68.15)

No

4 (2.23)

175 (97.77)

Ref

Ref

Nausea/Vomiting

Yes

7 (14.29)

42 (85.71)

0.005*

6.25 (1.75-22.37)

0.716

1.47 (0.18-11.96)

No

4 (2.60)

150 (97.40)

Ref

Ref

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; COR, crude odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; (*), candidate variables for multivariable analysis at p< 0.25; (**), variables statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression at p<0.05.

3.7. Antibiotics Susceptibility of L. monocytogenes

L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin (10, 90.91%), meropenem (9, 81.82%), sulfamethoxazole (4, 36.36%) and erythromycin (3, 27.27%). The strain was susceptible to ampicillin (10, 90.91%) (Figure 1).

3.8. Antibiogram of Listeria monocytogenes

Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed on 11 L. monocytogenes isolates, and 10 isolates were resistant to one of the five antibiotics. One (10%), two (20%), one (10%), and five (50%) isolates were resistant to five, four, three, and two of the antibiotics tested, respectively. One isolate of L. monocytogenes was resistant only to benzyl penicillin, and the remaining nine (90%) isolates of L. monocytogenes were resistant to one or five antibiotics tested (Table 8).
Table 8. Antibiograms of 10 L. monocytogenes isolates among pregnant women attending Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia, May 30 to July 30, 2022.

Resistance pattern

Resistant strain, n (%)

BP

1 (10)

BP, Mem

5 (50)

BP, Mem, SXT

1 (10)

BP, Ery, Mem, SXT

2 (20)

Amp, BP, Ery, Mem, SXT

1 (10)

Total

10 (100)

Amp, ampicillin; BP, benzyl penicillin; Ery, erythromycin; Mem, meropenem; SXT, sulfamethoxazole.
4. Discussion
In the present study, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was found to be 11/203 (5.42%; 95% CI=2.88-9.38). This finding was similar to those of the Tertiary Care Hospital in Tehran, Iran (5.5%) , and in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia (5.56%) . However, it was greater than the study findings in Arash Hospital in Tehran, Iran (4, 4.0%) and a study conducted on fecal carriers in HIV-uninfected pregnant women in Brazil (2.9%) . On the other hand, it was less than the findings of the Gynecology Department, Bharatpur, Nepal (16.7%) , Salah Al-deen Province (13.82%) , Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia (8.5%) , and India (6.3%) . The variation in the study findings might be due to differences in socio-demographic characteristics, study population, access to health facilities, and methodology used.
In this study, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women was found to be higher in the age group 25–34 years (8/72; 11.11%) with AOR=4.40 (95% CI=0.61-31.74), p=0.141), agreement with findings , daily worker (4/40; 10%) with COR=2.89 (95% CI=0.50-16.62), p=0.235), and rural (3/39; 7.69%) with COR=1.63 (95% CI=0.41-6.43), p=0.489), agreement with findings , third trimester (6/77; 7.79%) with COR=3.38 (95% CI=0.39-29.08), p=0.267), agreement with findings . The possible reasons for the high prevalence in the present study could be the high-risk group, populated area, pregnancy-related suppressed cell-mediated immunity, placental tropism of L. monocytogenes and sudden changes in hormones during pregnancy.
Pregnant women who had a frequent feeding habit of uncooked meat (8; 10.67%) with AOR=6.99 (95% CI=1.39-35.14), p=0.018) were highly infected with L. monocytogenes, which is in agreement with previous findings . The odds of uncooked meat consumption among pregnant women who had the habit of frequently eating uncooked meat was 6.99-times higher than that among those who did not frequently eating uncooked meat (AOR=6.99; 95% CI=1.39-35.14, p=0.018). This might be due to the fact that cattle and sheep are natural hosts for L. monocytogenes and it can easily be transmitted by eating contaminated uncooked meat.
Pregnant women who frequently ate uncooked vegetables (9; 9.47%) with AOR=6.62 (95% CI=1.04-42.30), p=0.046) were highly infected with L. monocytogenes, which is in agreement with the previous findings . This study showed that pregnant women who had the habit of frequently eating uncooked vegetables were 6.62-times at greater risk than those pregnant women who had no habit of frequently eating uncooked vegetables (AOR=6.62; 95% CI=1.04-42.30, p=0.046). This may be because vegetables are the primary reservoirs for L. monocytogenes and can easily be transmitted by eating uncooked vegetables because they are food-borne diseases and are present in contaminated raw vegetables.
Pregnant women who frequently drank unpasteurized milk (9; 11.54%) with AOR=7.56 (95% CI=1.33-42.97), p=0.023) were highly infected with L. monocytogenes, which was in agreement with previous findings . Pregnant women who frequently drank unpasteurized milk were 7.56-times more at risk of L. monocytogenes infection (AOR=7.56; 95% CI=1.33-42.97, p=0.023). This might be due to the fact that L. monocytogenes can easily be transmitted by drinking unpasteurized milk because it might be contaminated during milking from cows, during preservation, or from the environment.
Additionally, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was high in pregnant women who showed clinical signs and symptoms such as nausea/vomiting (n=7; 14.29%) with AOR=1.47 (95% CI=0.18-11.96), p=0.716) and fever (n=7; 29.17%) with AOR=14.65 (95% CI=3.15-68.15), p=0.001) which was in agreement with previous findings . The results of this study indicated that the probability of isolating L. monocytogenes was 14.65-times greater in pregnant women who showed clinical signs and symptoms of fever than those who did not show clinical signs and symptoms of fever (AOR=14.65; 95% CI=3.15-68.15, p=0.001). This might be due to the fact that L. monocytogenes infections usually showed clinical signs and symptoms of fever.
In our study, we observed high antibiotic resistance in L. monocytogenes to benzyl penicillin (90.91%) and meropenem (81.82%). This is because, L. monocytogenes infections are usually treated clinically without culture isolation, and antibiotic susceptibility tests are performed for L. monocytogenes. Similar findings were reported in other studies . In contrast, ampicillin showed better antibiotic activity against L. monocytogenes. This is in agreement with the findings of previous studies .
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
The prevalence of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women attending the Millennium Health Center is high. L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin, meropenem, erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole, and susceptible to ampicillin. Uncooked meat, raw vegetables, unpasteurized milk, and fever were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes infection. Pregnant women should avoid eating foods commonly contaminated with L. monocytogenes, such as uncooked meat, unpasteurized milk, and raw vegetables. Early detection of L. monocytogenes via blood culture and drug sensitivity testing may reduce the rate of antibiotic resistance. Further studies are needed to isolate species and strains using molecular methods and to determine the most feasible combination of antibiotics for the management of L. monocytogenes infection during pregnancy.
6. Limitations of the Study
This study could not determine cause-and-effect relationship because it was a cross-sectional study. In addition, the status of HIV, diabetes, history of abortion, and other immunological disorders were not assessed.
Abbreviations
ATCC: American Type Culture Collection
CAMP: Christie, Atkins, Munch-Petersen
CLSI: Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute
EUCAST: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
MHA: Muller Hinton Agar
TSB: Tryptic Soy Broth
TSBYE: Tryptose Soy Broth With 0.6% Yeast Extract
Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB) (reference number IRB/147/14). Permission was obtained from the Millennium Health Center. Data were collected from study participants after obtaining written informed consent. All information obtained from the study participants was confidential and was used only for this study. The results of patients were kept confidential by using codes, and whether positive or negative results were reported to clinicians by the assigned runner.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Hawassa University School of Medical Laboratory Science, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Regional Public Health Laboratory, Millennium Health Center, and their staffs for their professional support, necessary materials and equipment. We also thank the participants for their willingness to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
FD was involved in the proposed design, study participant selection, materials provided, laboratory investigation, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. AA contributed in laboratory investigation and manuscript preparation, DD and DY supervised laboratory work and all the investigation processes and contributed in the manuscript preparation and approval to the final version of this paper and AW contributed in data analysis and revision of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No fund was obtained for this research.
Data Availability Statement
There are no remaining data and materials, and all this information is presented in the main manuscript. The raw data-sets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Bucur, F. I., et al., Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to stress conditions encountered in food and food processing environments. Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. 9: p. 2700.
[2] Letchumanan, V., et al., A review on the characteristics, taxanomy and prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes. Progress In Microbes & Molecular Biology, 2018. 1(1).
[3] Radoshevich, L. and P. Cossart, Listeria monocytogenes: towards a complete picture of its physiology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018. 16(1): p. 32-46.
[4] Al Ohaly, R., et al., Listeria spondylodiscitis: an uncommon etiology of a common condition; a case report. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2020. 20(1): p. 1-4.
[5] Ryser, E. T., Listeria. Foodborne Infections and Intoxications. 2021, Elsevier Academic press, p. 201-220.
[6] Wadhwa Desai, R. and M. A. Smith, Pregnancy-related listeriosis. Birth defects research, 2017. 109(5): p. 324-335.
[7] True, H., et al., Monocytes and macrophages in pregnancy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Immunological Reviews, 2022. Volume 308, Issue 1, Pages 77-92.
[8] Goudar, V. and N. Prasad, A Critical Review on Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Innovations in Biological and Chemical Sciences, Volume 13, 2020, 95-103.2.
[9] Madjunkov, M., S. Chaudhry, and S. Ito, Listeriosis during pregnancy. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2017. 296(2): p. 143-152.
[10] Hunjak, B., et al., Listeria monocytogenes–clinical significance in pregnant women and newborns. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2019. 79: p. 88.
[11] Lamond, N. M., et al., Cardiotropic isolates of Listeria monocytogenes with enhanced vertical transmission dependent upon the bacterial surface protein InlB. Infection and Immunity, 2021. 89(2): p. e00321-20.
[12] Zhao, Q., et al., Prevalence and transmission characteristics of Listeria species from ruminants in farm and slaughtering environments in China. Emerging microbes & infections, 2021. 10(1): p. 356-364.
[13] Skowron, K., et al., Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from milk and humans and the possibility of milk-borne strains transmission. Polish journal of microbiology, 2019. 68(3): p. 353.
[14] Kurpas, M., K. Wieczorek, and J. Osek, Ready-to-eat meat products as a source of Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of veterinary research, 2018. 62(1): p. 49.
[15] Fagerlund, A., S. Langsrud, and T. Møretrø, In-depth longitudinal study of Listeria monocytogenes ST9 isolates from the meat processing industry: resolving diversity and transmission patterns using whole-genome sequencing. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. 86(14): p. e00579-20.
[16] Craig, A. M., et al., Listeriosis in pregnancy: a review. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2019. 74(6): p. 362-368.
[17] Roberts, B. N., et al., Listeria monocytogenes response to anaerobic environments. Pathogens, 2020. 9(3): p. 210.
[18] Rodriguez, C., et al., Listeria monocytogenes dissemination in farming and primary production: Sources, shedding and control measures. Food Control, 2021. 120: p. 107540.
[19] Wang, Z., et al., An Update Review on Listeria Infection in Pregnancy. Infection and Drug Resistance, 2021. 14: p. 1967.
[20] Etty, M.-C., et al., Effect of the optimized selective enrichment medium on the expression of the p60 protein used as Listeria monocytogenes antigen in specific sandwich ELISA. Research in microbiology, 2019. 170(4-5): p. 182-191.
[21] Al-dorri, A. Z. R. A., Study of bacteria Listeria monocytogenes in spontaneous aborted women in Salah Al-deen province. Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, 2018. 21(3): p. 12-17.
[22] Valenti, M., et al., Listeria monocytogenes infections: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2021. 82(10): p. 1-6.
[23] Xu, L., Y. Du, and Y. Wu, Neglected listeria infection in pregnancy in China: 93 cases. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2022: p. 1-9.
[24] Feyisa, A., M. Negash, and Y. Melka, Urban green infrastructure affects woody plant diversity and carbon stock in Hawassa city in Ethiopia. Arboricultural Journal, 2022: p. 1-15.
[25] FEDD Hawassa, F. A. E. D. D. O. H. C., Socio-Economic and Geo-Spatial Data Analysis and Dissemination Core Work Process: Socio-Economic Profile. 2019: Hawassa, Ethiopia: FEDD-Hawassa.
[26] Muleta, D., et al., Bacterial Profile and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern among Adult Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infection at Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia. Sciences, 2022. 11(6): p. 104-116.
[27] EUCAST, Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. T. E. C. O. A. S. Testing. Vol. Version 12.0,. 2022.
[28] Wayne, P., CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed.
[29] Heidarzadeh, S., et al., Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Serotyping, and Molecular Charac-terization of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Listeria monocyto-genes Isolated from Pregnant Women with a History of Abortion. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021. 50(1): p. 170-179.
[30] Girma, L., et al., Isolation and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes among women attending Jimma University medical center, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2021. 21(1): p. 1-6.
[31] Heidari, S. and M. M. Soltan Dallal, Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from pregnant women with and without history of abortion and detection of hemolysin (hlyA) gene in clinical samples. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, 2018. 23(5): p. 96-107.
[32] Freitag, I. G. R., et al., Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes fecal carriers in HIV-infected and-uninfected pregnant women from Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2021. 52(4): p. 2081-2084.
[33] Jha, B. K., N. Adhikari, and S. Rajkumari, Isolation, Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Listeria Monocytogens from Pregnant Women. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 2021. 17(3).
[34] Welekidan, L. N., et al., Prevalence and drug resistance pattern of Listeria monocytogenes among pregnant women in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC research notes, 2019. 12(1): p. 1-6.
[35] Singaravelu, B., G. Babu, and S. K. Kannan, Prevalence of Pregnancy Associated Listerioisis in and around Puducherry, India. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 2019. 10(2).
[36] Diriba, K., E. Awulachew, and K. Diribsa, The prevalence of Listeria species in different food items of animal and plant origin in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Medical Research, 2021. 26(1): p. 1-9.
[37] Kayode, A. J. and A. I. Okoh, Incidence and genetic diversity of multi-drug resistant Listeria monocytogenes isolates recovered from fruits and vegetables in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2022. 363: p. 109513.
[38] Borena, B. M., et al., Listeria Species Occurrence and Associated Risk Factors and Antibiogram of Listeria Monocytogenes in Milk and Milk Products in Ambo, Holeta, and Bako Towns, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2022. 2022.
[39] Anwar, T. M., et al., Genetic diversity, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes from food, livestock, and clinical samples between 2002 and 2019 in China. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2022. 366: p. 109572.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lemma, F. D., Adinew, A. A., Reda, D. Y., Gidebo, D. D., Bankere, A. W. (2024). Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 12(2), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lemma, F. D.; Adinew, A. A.; Reda, D. Y.; Gidebo, D. D.; Bankere, A. W. Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024, 12(2), 20-30. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lemma FD, Adinew AA, Reda DY, Gidebo DD, Bankere AW. Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center. J Gynecol Obstet. 2024;12(2):20-30. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12,
      author = {Fikru Deressa Lemma and Alegntaw Abate Adinew and Dawit Yihdego Reda and Deresse Daka Gidebo and Assefa Washo Bankere},
      title = {Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center
    },
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {12},
      number = {2},
      pages = {20-30},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20241202.12},
      abstract = {Background: Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes serious invasive infections in pregnant women, resulting in disseminated fetal infections, abortions, and still-births. Although it causes a greater burden on pregnant women and their infants, the case in Ethiopia is overlooked, and there is a scarcity of data on L. monocytogenes, particularly in the southern parts of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and, antibiotics susceptibility of L. monocytogenes and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending the Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 203 pregnant women between May 30 and July 30, 2022. Socio-demographic data and 5 ml venous blood samples were collected from pregnant women using structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariate logistic regression was carried out then variables with pp-values Results: The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women was found to be 11/203 (5.42%; 95% CI=2.88-9.38). L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin (90.91%) and meropenem (81.82%), but susceptible to ampicillin (90.91%). Raw meat (AOR=6.99; 95% CI=1.39-35.14), p=0.018), uncooked vegetables (AOR=6.62; 95% CI=1.04-42.30), p=0.046), unpasteurized milk (AOR=7.56; 95% CI=1.33-42.97), p=0.023) and fever (AOR=14.65; 95% CI=3.15-68.15), p=0.001) were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes infection. Conclusion: L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin, meropenem, erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole but susceptible to ampicillin. Raw meat, uncooked vegetables, unpasteurized milk, and fever were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Prevalence, Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Listeria Monocytogenes, and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Millennium Health Center
    
    AU  - Fikru Deressa Lemma
    AU  - Alegntaw Abate Adinew
    AU  - Dawit Yihdego Reda
    AU  - Deresse Daka Gidebo
    AU  - Assefa Washo Bankere
    Y1  - 2024/04/17
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 20
    EP  - 30
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241202.12
    AB  - Background: Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes serious invasive infections in pregnant women, resulting in disseminated fetal infections, abortions, and still-births. Although it causes a greater burden on pregnant women and their infants, the case in Ethiopia is overlooked, and there is a scarcity of data on L. monocytogenes, particularly in the southern parts of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and, antibiotics susceptibility of L. monocytogenes and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending the Millennium Health Center, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 203 pregnant women between May 30 and July 30, 2022. Socio-demographic data and 5 ml venous blood samples were collected from pregnant women using structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariate logistic regression was carried out then variables with pp-values Results: The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes among pregnant women was found to be 11/203 (5.42%; 95% CI=2.88-9.38). L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin (90.91%) and meropenem (81.82%), but susceptible to ampicillin (90.91%). Raw meat (AOR=6.99; 95% CI=1.39-35.14), p=0.018), uncooked vegetables (AOR=6.62; 95% CI=1.04-42.30), p=0.046), unpasteurized milk (AOR=7.56; 95% CI=1.33-42.97), p=0.023) and fever (AOR=14.65; 95% CI=3.15-68.15), p=0.001) were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes infection. Conclusion: L. monocytogenes was resistant to benzyl penicillin, meropenem, erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole but susceptible to ampicillin. Raw meat, uncooked vegetables, unpasteurized milk, and fever were significantly associated with L. monocytogenes.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Werabe University, Werabe, Ethiopia

  • Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Hawassa College of Health Sciences, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Microbiology, School of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Microbiology, School of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Hawassa College of Health Sciences, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Methodology
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusions and Recommendations
    6. 6. Limitations of the Study
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Declarations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Data Availability Statement
  • Conflicts of Interests
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information