Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso; Agus Sukristyanto; Bambang Kusbandrijo

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso, Agus Sukristyanto, Bambang Kusbandrijo

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 4, Issue 4)

Received: 7 November 2020 Accepted: 25 December 2020 Published: 31 December 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Thematic Village Policy (KDT) is one of the priority policies of the Pamekasan Regency Government in the 2018-2023 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD). This policy emphasizes its implementation in the village area, so it is clearly needed the support and participation of the head of village as the leader at the village level to make it happen. One year after the launch of the program, the significance of this program was not yet apparent, so researchers were interested in gathering head of villages in KDT. This qualitative research using interview method used 4 informants from villages that had different qualifications, namely the Independent, Advanced, Developing and Disadvantaged Villages selected based on the southern, central and northern regions of Pamekasan Regency. KDT did not invite many head of villages, and the technical guidelines had not been developed properly, but the participation of head of villages as a whole was very high, meaning that all villages could realize KDT, according to a qualitative agreement, participatory participation was low, because there were findings that appeared not based on a complete understanding with regard to the policy concept, it is therefore agreed that standard negotiations be made, optimizing the driving factors and inhibiting factors, and it is necessary to replicate the ideal model of head of village election so that it is more optimal.

Published in	Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
Page(s)	85-94
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Participation, Policy, Village, Thematic

References

[1]	Agus Sukristyanto. Governor Election and Political Participation in East Java Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 191. Atlantis Press. (2018).
[2]	Creswell, J. N. Research Design: pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan mix, penerjemah Ahmad Fawaid, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, (2012).
[3]	Fasli Jalal dan Dedi Supriadi. Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Depdiknas Bapenas Adicitakaryanusa. Jakarta, (2001).
[4]	Kartono, K. Pemimpin Dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. (2003).
[5]	Moejiono, I. Kepemimpinan dan Keorganisasian, Yogjakarta, UII Press. (2002).
[6]	Ritzer, G.& Goodman, D. J. Teori Sosiologi Modern; Alih bahasa Alimandan, Jakarta, Prenada Media, (2005).
[7]	Robert Chambers. Ideas For Development. London: Earthscan. (2005).
[8]	Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum. Desentralisasi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.(2011).
[9]	Slamet, Y. Pembangunan Masyarakat Berwawasan Partisipasi. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press, (1994).
[10]	Subarsono, Ag. Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, (2015).
[11]	Sumaryadi, I. Nyoman., Sosiologi Pemerintahan. Penerbit: Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor. (2010).
[12]	Sundariningrum. Klasifikasi Partisipasi. Jakarta: Grasindo, (2001).
[13]	Suryadi. Kepemimpinan. Surabaya: Putra Media Nusantara, (2010).
[14]	Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Nasional.
[15]	Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 8 Tahun 2008. Tahapan Tata Cara Penyusunan Pengendalian Dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan Daerah.
[16]	Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Pamekasan Nomor 9 Tahun 2019 tentang RPJMD 2018-2023.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso, Agus Sukristyanto, Bambang Kusbandrijo. (2020). Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(4), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso; Agus Sukristyanto; Bambang Kusbandrijo. Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. J. Public Policy Adm. 2020, 4(4), 85-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso, Agus Sukristyanto, Bambang Kusbandrijo. Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. J Public Policy Adm. 2020;4(4):85-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14,
  author = {Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso and Agus Sukristyanto and Bambang Kusbandrijo},
  title = {Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {85-94},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20200404.14},
  abstract = {Thematic Village Policy (KDT) is one of the priority policies of the Pamekasan Regency Government in the 2018-2023 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD). This policy emphasizes its implementation in the village area, so it is clearly needed the support and participation of the head of village as the leader at the village level to make it happen. One year after the launch of the program, the significance of this program was not yet apparent, so researchers were interested in gathering head of villages in KDT. This qualitative research using interview method used 4 informants from villages that had different qualifications, namely the Independent, Advanced, Developing and Disadvantaged Villages selected based on the southern, central and northern regions of Pamekasan Regency. KDT did not invite many head of villages, and the technical guidelines had not been developed properly, but the participation of head of villages as a whole was very high, meaning that all villages could realize KDT, according to a qualitative agreement, participatory participation was low, because there were findings that appeared not based on a complete understanding with regard to the policy concept, it is therefore agreed that standard negotiations be made, optimizing the driving factors and inhibiting factors, and it is necessary to replicate the ideal model of head of village election so that it is more optimal.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District
AU  - Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso
AU  - Agus Sukristyanto
AU  - Bambang Kusbandrijo
Y1  - 2020/12/31
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 85
EP  - 94
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
AB  - Thematic Village Policy (KDT) is one of the priority policies of the Pamekasan Regency Government in the 2018-2023 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD). This policy emphasizes its implementation in the village area, so it is clearly needed the support and participation of the head of village as the leader at the village level to make it happen. One year after the launch of the program, the significance of this program was not yet apparent, so researchers were interested in gathering head of villages in KDT. This qualitative research using interview method used 4 informants from villages that had different qualifications, namely the Independent, Advanced, Developing and Disadvantaged Villages selected based on the southern, central and northern regions of Pamekasan Regency. KDT did not invite many head of villages, and the technical guidelines had not been developed properly, but the participation of head of villages as a whole was very high, meaning that all villages could realize KDT, according to a qualitative agreement, participatory participation was low, because there were findings that appeared not based on a complete understanding with regard to the policy concept, it is therefore agreed that standard negotiations be made, optimizing the driving factors and inhibiting factors, and it is necessary to replicate the ideal model of head of village election so that it is more optimal.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso

Pamekasan sub Distric, Pamekasan Regency Government, Pamekasan, Indonesia
Agus Sukristyanto

Political and Social Science Faculty, 17 August University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Bambang Kusbandrijo

Political and Social Science Faculty, 17 August University Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso, Agus Sukristyanto, Bambang Kusbandrijo. (2020). Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(4), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso; Agus Sukristyanto; Bambang Kusbandrijo. Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. J. Public Policy Adm. 2020, 4(4), 85-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso, Agus Sukristyanto, Bambang Kusbandrijo. Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District. J Public Policy Adm. 2020;4(4):85-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14,
  author = {Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso and Agus Sukristyanto and Bambang Kusbandrijo},
  title = {Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {85-94},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20200404.14},
  abstract = {Thematic Village Policy (KDT) is one of the priority policies of the Pamekasan Regency Government in the 2018-2023 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD). This policy emphasizes its implementation in the village area, so it is clearly needed the support and participation of the head of village as the leader at the village level to make it happen. One year after the launch of the program, the significance of this program was not yet apparent, so researchers were interested in gathering head of villages in KDT. This qualitative research using interview method used 4 informants from villages that had different qualifications, namely the Independent, Advanced, Developing and Disadvantaged Villages selected based on the southern, central and northern regions of Pamekasan Regency. KDT did not invite many head of villages, and the technical guidelines had not been developed properly, but the participation of head of villages as a whole was very high, meaning that all villages could realize KDT, according to a qualitative agreement, participatory participation was low, because there were findings that appeared not based on a complete understanding with regard to the policy concept, it is therefore agreed that standard negotiations be made, optimizing the driving factors and inhibiting factors, and it is necessary to replicate the ideal model of head of village election so that it is more optimal.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Head of Village Participation in Thematic Village Policy in Pamekasan District
AU  - Rahmat Kurniadi Suroso
AU  - Agus Sukristyanto
AU  - Bambang Kusbandrijo
Y1  - 2020/12/31
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 85
EP  - 94
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.14
AB  - Thematic Village Policy (KDT) is one of the priority policies of the Pamekasan Regency Government in the 2018-2023 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD). This policy emphasizes its implementation in the village area, so it is clearly needed the support and participation of the head of village as the leader at the village level to make it happen. One year after the launch of the program, the significance of this program was not yet apparent, so researchers were interested in gathering head of villages in KDT. This qualitative research using interview method used 4 informants from villages that had different qualifications, namely the Independent, Advanced, Developing and Disadvantaged Villages selected based on the southern, central and northern regions of Pamekasan Regency. KDT did not invite many head of villages, and the technical guidelines had not been developed properly, but the participation of head of villages as a whole was very high, meaning that all villages could realize KDT, according to a qualitative agreement, participatory participation was low, because there were findings that appeared not based on a complete understanding with regard to the policy concept, it is therefore agreed that standard negotiations be made, optimizing the driving factors and inhibiting factors, and it is necessary to replicate the ideal model of head of village election so that it is more optimal.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download