The informality of Strategic Research Project Management procedures is still a reality in several health science and technology institutions in Brazil, with a recognized negative impact on innovation management. The objective of this work is to verify the scientific and academic production related to the methodologies of strategic management of research projects and innovation in health in the databases of journals in the last 10 years, in the period from 2011 to 2021. The methodology used was the systematic review of literature based on the criteria of Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart (2003) to ensure the scope and impartiality of the research. The question that guided the selection of articles in this study was: “What are the main methodological references for the strategic management of research projects and innovation in health proposed in the scientific literature?” The databases defined for searches were Pubmed, SciELO, and Lilacs. 90 records were screened and reviewed by crossing keywords, descriptors, and eligibility criteria listed in research and innovation. The data collected for screening referred to specific information on the source/article/document (title, authors, journal, year, language) and main characteristics of the study (population profile, research context, objective, methodology used), as well as identification of emerging themes and additional notes. We conclude that, despite the interest in publications on the subject in question, the application of strategic management in research and innovation projects in Health is still emerging not only in Brazil but also in other countries recognized for the development of this area of study. The systematic review made it possible to identify the main practices described in scientific articles, which may help in assessing the implications and benefits generated using these strategies.
Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14 |
Page(s) | 25-35 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Strategic Management, Research Portfolio Management, Innovation Projects, Systematic Review
[1] | Mirian Miranda Cohen, Chayana Leocádio da Silva, Marcelino José Jorge. (2018). Cocriação em saúde: um levantamento sistemático da literatura. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração (12). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v12i3.13186. |
[2] | Nicolau Pestana, Elizabeth Bethencourt, José León Ramentol, Cira Galdós Sánchez, María del Carmen, Fernández Torrez, Sandra Brunet Bernal, Gerardo Ruiz Hunt Zaddys. (2018). Strategic changes of the center of immunology and biological products towards professional training, research, and technical scientific services. Humanidad. med (18). |
[3] | Eduardo Raupp de Vargas. (2007). Relação entre estratégia e inovação em serviços: análise de casos no setor hospitalar. Organizações & Sociedade (14). doi: 10.1590/S1984-92302007000100001. |
[4] | Nilmini S Wickramasinghe, Adam M A Fadlalla, Elie Geisler, Jonathan L Schaffer. (2005). A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. Int J Electron Healthc (3). doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2005.006478. |
[5] | Wagner Cardoso Padua Filho, Claudio Augusto Junqueira Carvalho, Betania Maria Meira. (2014). Inovação como um desafio para as empresas de saúde: a experiência em hospital privado. RAHIS (11). doi: https://doi.org/10.21450/rahis.v11i2.2008. |
[6] | Rolando Beulke & Dalvio José Bertó. Gestão de custos e resultado na saúde. São Paulo: Saraiva; 2000. |
[7] | Gustavo Severo de Borba Francisco & José Kliemann Neto. (2008). Gestão hospitalar: identificação das práticas de aprendizagem existentes em hospitais. Saúde Soc. São Paulo (17). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902008000100005. |
[8] | Carolina Santos, Vitor Santos, António Tavares, João Varajão. (2020). Project Management in Public Health: a systematic literature review on success criteria and factors. Portuguese Journal of Public Health (38). doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000509531. |
[9] | Julian Higgins & Sally Green. Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Intervention. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. |
[10] | David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart, PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews (4). doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. |
[11] | Justin Paul & Alex Rialp Criado. (2020). The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review (18). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717. |
[12] | David Tranfield, David Denyer, Palminder Smart. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge through a systematic review. British Journal of Managemen (14). |
[13] | Juan Miguel Hernández Bonilla. Em 95% dos artigos científicos, inglês cria ‘ditadura da língua’: apenas 1% está em português e espanhol [acesso em 15 jan 2023]. Disponível em: https://brasil.elpais.com/ciencia/2021-07-28/em-95-dos-artigos-cientificos-ingles-cria-ditadura-da-lingua-apenas-1-esta-em-portugues-e-espanhol.html. |
[14] | Robert G. Cooper, Scott J. Edgett, Elko J. Kleinschmidt. (2002). Optimizing the stage-gate process: What best-practice companies do-I. Research Technology Management (45). |
[15] | Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, Paula Vilas Boas Viveiros Lopes, Daniela Santana Lambert Marzagão. (2017). Gestão de portfólio de projetos: contribuições e tendências da literatura. Gest Prod. (20). |
[16] | Henrique Gonçalves de Castro, Marly Monteiro de Carvalho. (2010). Gerenciamento do portfólio de projetos (PPM): estudos de caso. Produção (20). doi: 10.1590/S0103-65132010005000044. |
[17] | Elizabeth Artmann, Maria Angélica Carvalho Andrade, Francisco Javier Uribe Rivera. (2013). Desafios para a discussão de missão institucional complexa: o caso de um Instituto de Pesquisa em Saúde. Ciênc. saúde coletiva (18). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000100020. |
[18] | Leonardo S. L. Passeri Mangelli. Gestão de projetos e o guia PMBOK: um estudo sobre o nível de uso do guia pmbok nas empresas brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: FGV; 2013. |
[19] | Gabriela de Fernandez Rezende. Diretrizes para construção de uma metodologia de gerenciamento de projetos de pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação tecnológica – caso do escritório de gerenciamento de projetos do INT na EMBRAPII. Niterói, RJ: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 2016. |
APA Style
Thais de Figueiredo Oliveira, Alessandra Cananéa, Giselle Vasconcellos, Mirian Miranda Cohen. (2023). Strategic Management of Research and Innovation Projects: A Systematic Literature Survey. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14
ACS Style
Thais de Figueiredo Oliveira; Alessandra Cananéa; Giselle Vasconcellos; Mirian Miranda Cohen. Strategic Management of Research and Innovation Projects: A Systematic Literature Survey. J. Public Policy Adm. 2023, 7(1), 25-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14
AMA Style
Thais de Figueiredo Oliveira, Alessandra Cananéa, Giselle Vasconcellos, Mirian Miranda Cohen. Strategic Management of Research and Innovation Projects: A Systematic Literature Survey. J Public Policy Adm. 2023;7(1):25-35. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14
@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14, author = {Thais de Figueiredo Oliveira and Alessandra Cananéa and Giselle Vasconcellos and Mirian Miranda Cohen}, title = {Strategic Management of Research and Innovation Projects: A Systematic Literature Survey}, journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {25-35}, doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20230701.14}, abstract = {The informality of Strategic Research Project Management procedures is still a reality in several health science and technology institutions in Brazil, with a recognized negative impact on innovation management. The objective of this work is to verify the scientific and academic production related to the methodologies of strategic management of research projects and innovation in health in the databases of journals in the last 10 years, in the period from 2011 to 2021. The methodology used was the systematic review of literature based on the criteria of Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart (2003) to ensure the scope and impartiality of the research. The question that guided the selection of articles in this study was: “What are the main methodological references for the strategic management of research projects and innovation in health proposed in the scientific literature?” The databases defined for searches were Pubmed, SciELO, and Lilacs. 90 records were screened and reviewed by crossing keywords, descriptors, and eligibility criteria listed in research and innovation. The data collected for screening referred to specific information on the source/article/document (title, authors, journal, year, language) and main characteristics of the study (population profile, research context, objective, methodology used), as well as identification of emerging themes and additional notes. We conclude that, despite the interest in publications on the subject in question, the application of strategic management in research and innovation projects in Health is still emerging not only in Brazil but also in other countries recognized for the development of this area of study. The systematic review made it possible to identify the main practices described in scientific articles, which may help in assessing the implications and benefits generated using these strategies.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Strategic Management of Research and Innovation Projects: A Systematic Literature Survey AU - Thais de Figueiredo Oliveira AU - Alessandra Cananéa AU - Giselle Vasconcellos AU - Mirian Miranda Cohen Y1 - 2023/04/11 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 25 EP - 35 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230701.14 AB - The informality of Strategic Research Project Management procedures is still a reality in several health science and technology institutions in Brazil, with a recognized negative impact on innovation management. The objective of this work is to verify the scientific and academic production related to the methodologies of strategic management of research projects and innovation in health in the databases of journals in the last 10 years, in the period from 2011 to 2021. The methodology used was the systematic review of literature based on the criteria of Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart (2003) to ensure the scope and impartiality of the research. The question that guided the selection of articles in this study was: “What are the main methodological references for the strategic management of research projects and innovation in health proposed in the scientific literature?” The databases defined for searches were Pubmed, SciELO, and Lilacs. 90 records were screened and reviewed by crossing keywords, descriptors, and eligibility criteria listed in research and innovation. The data collected for screening referred to specific information on the source/article/document (title, authors, journal, year, language) and main characteristics of the study (population profile, research context, objective, methodology used), as well as identification of emerging themes and additional notes. We conclude that, despite the interest in publications on the subject in question, the application of strategic management in research and innovation projects in Health is still emerging not only in Brazil but also in other countries recognized for the development of this area of study. The systematic review made it possible to identify the main practices described in scientific articles, which may help in assessing the implications and benefits generated using these strategies. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -