The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria

Sam Amadi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

| Peer-Reviewed

The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria

Sam Amadi

Published in Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 16 April 2021 Accepted: 12 May 2021 Published: 18 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Since 2003, anticorruption war has become a major plank of Nigeria’s governance reform. As part of the war, Nigeria has enacted anticorruption laws and established anticorruption agencies. This marks the triumph of ‘law enforcement’ over ‘change management’ approach to fighting corruption. This approach has not produced significant improvement in the integrity of governance and state institutions. Despite massive investment in law enforcement efforts, corruption remains prevalent and Nigeria’s standing in Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has not improved. This casts doubt on the potential of law as effective tool in the fight against corruption. The paper briefly reviews the history of Nigeria’s failed engagement with anticorruption campaigns and identifies the reasons for failure in the law enforcement approach to fighting corruption. Utilizing insights from culture studies and institutional economics, the paper argues against legal formalism as it manifests in excessive reliance on law enforcement techniques and tools to counter corruption in Nigeria. The paper argues further that law enforcement is too limited to constitute the main strategy for fighting corruption because it faces mainly on the symptoms rather than on the underlying causes of corruption as a social pathology. Therefore, an exclusive focus on law in the sense of what prosecutors and judges do, is ill-suited as a cure for pervasive corruption. To effectively control or contain corruption, the paper recommends abandoning legal formalism and contextualizing and socializing law in the light of insights from culture studies and institutional economics to change political culture and improve collective action.

Published in	Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
Page(s)	60-68
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anticorruption, Legal Realism, Legal Formalism, Institutional Economics, Collective Action, Legal Reform, Culture

References

[1]	Marx, K. 2008. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. London: Cosimo Classic.
[2]	Nwaodu, N, D. Adam and O. Okereke O. 2014. A Review of Anti-Corruption Wars In Nigeria. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/2d7f742119d279bba0e409a6c731c9d3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2044911.
[3]	Afigbo, A. E. 1972. The Warrant Chiefs: Indirect Rule in Southeastern Nigeria, 1891-1929. London: Longman.
[4]	Okonjo-Iweala, N. 2018. Fighting Corruption is Dangerous: The Story Behind the Headlines. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
[5]	Ocheje, P. “Norms, law and social change: Nigeria’s anti-corruption struggle, 1999-2017”. Crime, Law and Social Change. October 2018. Volume 70. Issue 3, pp 363-381.
[6]	Pierce, S. 2016. Moral economies of corruption, state formation and political culture in Nigeria. Durham. Duke University Press.
[7]	Smith, D. J. 2008. A Culture of Corruption: Everyday Deception and Popular Discontent in Nigeria. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[8]	Blando, G and O. de Sardan. J. 2006. Everyday corruption and the state in Africa. London. Zeb Books.
[9]	Anokwute, C. A. 2018. We Must Kill Corruption Before Corruption Will Kill Us: Anti-Corruption Quotes of President Muhamadu Buhari. Independent Publisher.
[10]	Transparent International. 2019. Corruption Perceptions Index, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/country/NGA.
[11]	Suberu, R. 2018. ‘Strategies for Advancing Anticorruption Reform in Nigeria”. Daedalus, Volume 147, Issue 3 (Summer) pp. 184-201.
[12]	Osinbanjo, Y. 2018. “Grand corruption Nigeria’s greatest problem, says Osinbajo in Germany”. The Punch. December, 2019 retrieved from https://punchng.com/grand-corruption-nigerias-greatest-problem-osinbajo-says-in-germany/.
[13]	Haldar, A., Stiglitz, J. (2013) “Analyzing Legal Formality and Informality: Lessons from Land Titling and Microfinance Programs” in David, K, and Stiglitz, J. 2013. Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14]	Qian, Y. 2017. How Reform Worked in China. Cambridge. MIT Press.
[15]	Ang, Y. 2016. How Cina Escaped the Poverty Trap. Ithaca. Cornel University Press.
[16]	Bicchieri, C. 2017. Norms in the Wild: How to diagnose, measure and change social norms. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
[17]	Habermas, J. 1987. A Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System, Boston. Beacon Press.
[18]	Johnston, M. 2013. Corruption, Contention and Reform: The Power of Deep Democratization. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
[19]	Achebe, C. 1984. The Trouble with Nigeria. Oxford: Heineman Educational Publishers.
[20]	Okonjo-Iweala, N. (2012). Reforming the Unreformable: Lessons from Nigeria.
[21]	Ogbeidi, M. (2012). “Political Leadership and Corruption in Nigeria Since 1990: A Socio-economic Analysis”. Journal of Nigerian Studies 1 (2) Fall. Retrieved http://www.unh.edu/nigerianstudies/articles/Issue2/Political_leadership.pdf.
[22]	Okpale, J. 2018. IN Memory of Nigeria: Where the Past Meets the Future. Abuja: Outskirts Press. 246.
[23]	Nwaobi, C. G. 2004. Corruption and Bribery in the Nigerian Economy: An Empirical Investigation. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwppe/0404006.html.
[24]	Lewis, P. 1996. “From Prebendalism to Predation: The Political Economy of Decline in Nigeria”. Journal of Modern African Studies. 34. No. 1: 77-103.
[25]	Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26]	Mungui-Pippidi, A. 2018 “Seven Steps to Control of Corruption: The Road Map”. Deadalus. Volume 147. Issue 3 (Summer) pp. 20-34.
[27]	Onuigbo, R. A. 2015. “Analysis of Legal Framework for Fight Corruption in Nigeria: Problems and Challenges”. Kuwait Chapter of Arabia Journal of Business and Management Review. 5 (3) Retrieved from https://www.arabianjbmr.com/pdfs/KD_VOL_5_3/1.pdf.
[28]	Adebayo, A. 1981. Principles and practice of public administration in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Publishers.
[29]	Lui, F. T. 1996. “Three Aspects of Corruption”. Contemporary economic policy, Vol. XIX: 26-29.
[30]	Klitgaard, R. (1998, March). International cooperation against corruption. Finance & development, 35 (1) 3-6.
[31]	Tansi, V. 1994. Corruption, Governmental Activities and Markets. Working Paper. 94/99. International Monetary Fund.
[32]	Cheung, S. 1996. “A Simplistic General Equilibrium Theory of Corruption”. Contemporary economic policy XIV: 1-5.
[33]	World Bank. 2000. Anti-corruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
[34]	Huther, J., Shah, A. (2000, December). Anti-corruption policies and program: A framework for evaluation. Policy research working paper 2501, the World Bank-Operations evaluation department-Country Evaluation and Regional Relations Division.
[35]	Brown, G. 2010. Beyond the Crash: Overcoming the First Crisis of Globalization. London: Simon & Schuster.
[36]	World Bank. 2020. Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption. Malaysia: The World Bank.
[37]	Amadi, S. 2009. Privatization and the Public Good: The Rule of Law Challenge. London: CPPR.
[38]	Hoffman, L. and Raj N. (2017). Collective Action on Corruption in Nigeria: A Social Norms Approach to Connecting Society and Institutions. London. Chatham House.
[39]	Sappington, D. and J. Stiglitz. 1987. Privatization, Information and Incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6. 567-582.
[40]	Laffont, J and J. Tirole. 1991. Privatization and Incentives. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 7. 84-105.
[41]	Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishy. 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance” Journal of Finance 52. 737-783.
[42]	Olken, B. and R. Pande. 2012. “Corruption in Developing Countries”. Annual Review of Economics. 4. 479-509.
[43]	Aumann, R. J. and J. H. Dreze. 2005. When All is Said and Done: How Should You Play and What Should you Expect. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
[44]	Rothstein, B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problems of Trust. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
[45]	Rothstein, B. 2018. “Fighting Systemic Corruption: The Indirect Strategy”. Daedalus Vol. 147. Issue 3 (Summer) pp. 5-49.
[46]	North, D. 2006. “What is missing political economy” in Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Barry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[47]	Young, H. P. 1998. Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[48]	Rothstein, B. 2007. Anti-Corruption- A Big Bang Theory. The Quality of government paper series 3. Retrieved from http://www.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350652_2007_3_rothstein.pdf.
[49]	Fukuyama F. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York. Farrar Straus and Giroux.
[50]	Pritchett L and Woolcock M. 2008. “Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development”. World Development 32 (2) 1991-212.
[51]	Shklar, J. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trial. Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press.
[52]	Wrong, M. 2010. It’s our turn to eat: The story of a Kenyan whistle-blower. London: Fourth Estate.
[53]	Bicchieri, C., J. W. Lindemans and T. Jang. 2014. A Structured approach to a diagnostic of collective practices. Frontiers in Psychology, Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01418/full.
[54]	Getz, K and Volkem, R. 2001. “Culture, Perceived Corruption, and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcome”. Business & Society Volume 40 Issue 1, pages 7-30.
[55]	Seleim, A and Bonis, N. “The Relationship between culture and corruption: A cross-national study” Journal of Intellectual Capital.
[56]	Dixit, A. 2018. “Anti-Corruption Institutions: Some History and Theory”. Kaushik Basu and Tito Cordella. Institutions, Governance and the Control of Corruption. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
[57]	Smith, D. 2008. A Culture of Corruption: Everyday Deception and Popular Discontent in Nigeria. New Haven: Princeton University.
[58]	Mkwandawire, T. 2012 “Institutional Monocropping and Monotasking in Africa” in Norman, A, Botchwey, K, Stein, H. and Stiglitz J. 2012 Good Growth and Governance in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[59]	Andrew, M. 2008. The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford: Oxford Development Studies 36 (4).
[60]	Tylor, E. B. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches in the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. London: John Murray.
[61]	Lopez-Claros, A and Perotti, V. 2014. Does Culture Matter for Development? Police Research Working Paper, No. 7082. Washington: World Bank pages 6 and 7.
[62]	Woolcock, M. 2014. “Culture, Politics and Development” Policy Research Working Paper 6939. Washington. World Bank.
[63]	Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in action: symbols and strategies”. American Sociological Review 51: 273-286.
[64]	Breman, G, L. Eriksen, R. Goodin, and N. Southwood. 2013. Explaining Norms. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
[65]	Bicchieri, C. and E. Xiao. 2009. “Do the Right; But Only If Others Do So”. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 22 (2). 191-208.
[66]	Hall, P. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State”. Comparative Politics 23: 274-295.
[67]	Collier, P. 2007. “The Cultural Foundations of Economic Failure” in Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (4).
[68]	Adebanwi, W. and E, Obadare. 2011. “When Corruption Fights Back: Democracy and Elite Interest in Nigeria’s Anticorruption War” Journal of Modern African Studies 29 (2). 185-213.
[69]	North, D. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
[70]	Lambsdorff, J. 2007. The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sam Amadi. (2021). The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 5(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sam Amadi. The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2021, 5(2), 60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sam Amadi. The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2021;5(2):60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11,
  author = {Sam Amadi},
  title = {The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria},
  journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {60-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20210502.11},
  abstract = {Since 2003, anticorruption war has become a major plank of Nigeria’s governance reform. As part of the war, Nigeria has enacted anticorruption laws and established anticorruption agencies. This marks the triumph of ‘law enforcement’ over ‘change management’ approach to fighting corruption. This approach has not produced significant improvement in the integrity of governance and state institutions. Despite massive investment in law enforcement efforts, corruption remains prevalent and Nigeria’s standing in Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has not improved. This casts doubt on the potential of law as effective tool in the fight against corruption. The paper briefly reviews the history of Nigeria’s failed engagement with anticorruption campaigns and identifies the reasons for failure in the law enforcement approach to fighting corruption. Utilizing insights from culture studies and institutional economics, the paper argues against legal formalism as it manifests in excessive reliance on law enforcement techniques and tools to counter corruption in Nigeria. The paper argues further that law enforcement is too limited to constitute the main strategy for fighting corruption because it faces mainly on the symptoms rather than on the underlying causes of corruption as a social pathology. Therefore, an exclusive focus on law in the sense of what prosecutors and judges do, is ill-suited as a cure for pervasive corruption. To effectively control or contain corruption, the paper recommends abandoning legal formalism and contextualizing and socializing law in the light of insights from culture studies and institutional economics to change political culture and improve collective action.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria
AU  - Sam Amadi
Y1  - 2021/08/18
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
SP  - 60
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4621
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
AB  - Since 2003, anticorruption war has become a major plank of Nigeria’s governance reform. As part of the war, Nigeria has enacted anticorruption laws and established anticorruption agencies. This marks the triumph of ‘law enforcement’ over ‘change management’ approach to fighting corruption. This approach has not produced significant improvement in the integrity of governance and state institutions. Despite massive investment in law enforcement efforts, corruption remains prevalent and Nigeria’s standing in Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has not improved. This casts doubt on the potential of law as effective tool in the fight against corruption. The paper briefly reviews the history of Nigeria’s failed engagement with anticorruption campaigns and identifies the reasons for failure in the law enforcement approach to fighting corruption. Utilizing insights from culture studies and institutional economics, the paper argues against legal formalism as it manifests in excessive reliance on law enforcement techniques and tools to counter corruption in Nigeria. The paper argues further that law enforcement is too limited to constitute the main strategy for fighting corruption because it faces mainly on the symptoms rather than on the underlying causes of corruption as a social pathology. Therefore, an exclusive focus on law in the sense of what prosecutors and judges do, is ill-suited as a cure for pervasive corruption. To effectively control or contain corruption, the paper recommends abandoning legal formalism and contextualizing and socializing law in the light of insights from culture studies and institutional economics to change political culture and improve collective action.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sam Amadi

Faculty of Law, Baze University, Abuja, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sam Amadi. (2021). The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 5(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sam Amadi. The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2021, 5(2), 60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sam Amadi. The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2021;5(2):60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11,
  author = {Sam Amadi},
  title = {The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria},
  journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {60-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20210502.11},
  abstract = {Since 2003, anticorruption war has become a major plank of Nigeria’s governance reform. As part of the war, Nigeria has enacted anticorruption laws and established anticorruption agencies. This marks the triumph of ‘law enforcement’ over ‘change management’ approach to fighting corruption. This approach has not produced significant improvement in the integrity of governance and state institutions. Despite massive investment in law enforcement efforts, corruption remains prevalent and Nigeria’s standing in Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has not improved. This casts doubt on the potential of law as effective tool in the fight against corruption. The paper briefly reviews the history of Nigeria’s failed engagement with anticorruption campaigns and identifies the reasons for failure in the law enforcement approach to fighting corruption. Utilizing insights from culture studies and institutional economics, the paper argues against legal formalism as it manifests in excessive reliance on law enforcement techniques and tools to counter corruption in Nigeria. The paper argues further that law enforcement is too limited to constitute the main strategy for fighting corruption because it faces mainly on the symptoms rather than on the underlying causes of corruption as a social pathology. Therefore, an exclusive focus on law in the sense of what prosecutors and judges do, is ill-suited as a cure for pervasive corruption. To effectively control or contain corruption, the paper recommends abandoning legal formalism and contextualizing and socializing law in the light of insights from culture studies and institutional economics to change political culture and improve collective action.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Failure of Anticorruption Campaign as a Failure of Law Reform in Nigeria
AU  - Sam Amadi
Y1  - 2021/08/18
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
SP  - 60
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4621
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.11
AB  - Since 2003, anticorruption war has become a major plank of Nigeria’s governance reform. As part of the war, Nigeria has enacted anticorruption laws and established anticorruption agencies. This marks the triumph of ‘law enforcement’ over ‘change management’ approach to fighting corruption. This approach has not produced significant improvement in the integrity of governance and state institutions. Despite massive investment in law enforcement efforts, corruption remains prevalent and Nigeria’s standing in Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has not improved. This casts doubt on the potential of law as effective tool in the fight against corruption. The paper briefly reviews the history of Nigeria’s failed engagement with anticorruption campaigns and identifies the reasons for failure in the law enforcement approach to fighting corruption. Utilizing insights from culture studies and institutional economics, the paper argues against legal formalism as it manifests in excessive reliance on law enforcement techniques and tools to counter corruption in Nigeria. The paper argues further that law enforcement is too limited to constitute the main strategy for fighting corruption because it faces mainly on the symptoms rather than on the underlying causes of corruption as a social pathology. Therefore, an exclusive focus on law in the sense of what prosecutors and judges do, is ill-suited as a cure for pervasive corruption. To effectively control or contain corruption, the paper recommends abandoning legal formalism and contextualizing and socializing law in the light of insights from culture studies and institutional economics to change political culture and improve collective action.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download