The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State

Fikre Kura Gizaw

doi:doi:10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

| Peer-Reviewed

The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State

Fikre Kura Gizaw

Published in Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 8 June 2021 Accepted: 12 July 2021 Published: 18 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state’s ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of ‘democratic centralism’ and ‘party discipline’; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.

Published in	Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
Page(s)	69-90
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Federalism, Autonomy, Regional Policy Making, GPNRS

References

[1]	Smith, Kevin B. (2002). Typologies, Taxonomies and the Benefits of Policy Classification.” Policy Studies Journal 30: 379–395.
[2]	Anderson, E. James. (2006). Public policymaking: an introduction. 6th edition. USA: Houghton Mifflin.
[3]	Howlett, M. and Ramesh M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles, and Policy subsystems (2nd edn.). Canada: Oxford University Press.
[4]	Geurts, Jac & Joldersma, Cisca. (2001). Methodology for Participatory Policy Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 128. 300-310. 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00073-4.
[5]	Emeka, Obi, Lambert Nwachukwu & Charles Obiora and Udoye Ifeoma, (2008). Public policy analysis and decision making.
[6]	Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE), (1995). The Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa: Berhanena Selam Printing Press.
[7]	Turton, D. (2006). Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in Comparative Perspective. London: James Currey.
[8]	Markakis, J. (2012). Ethiopia: The Last Two Frontiers. London: James Currey. ‘Office of the Speaker and Secretariat of the Caffee of the National Regional State of Oromia,’ 2011 (Information Bulletin).
[9]	Kassahun, Berhanu (2009). Ethiopia: Beleaguered Opposition under a Dominant Party System. Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa University, (Unpublished).
[10]	Abebe, Mulualem and Cloete, G S. (2007). Public Policy-Making in Contemporary Ethiopia. Africa Insight. 36. 10.4314/ai.v36i3.22483.
[11]	Dereje, Terefe, (2016). Policy Mandates and Practices in a Federal System: The Case of Oromia National Regional State (Ethiopia). Public Policy and Administration Research. Vol. 6, No. 11, 2016. Available at: www.iiste.org.
[12]	Alefe, Abeje (2013). Party System Institutionalization and the Prospect of Democratic Consolidation in Ethiopia, European Scientific Journal, vol. 9, No. 23.
[13]	Bayeh, E., (2018). Single party Dominance in Ethiopia: FPTP Electoral System and Parliamentary Government System as Contributing Factors, UDN Journal of Political Science, Vol. 20 No. 4 http://journals.rudn.ru/political_science).
[14]	Solomon, M. Gofie, (2015). Central Control and Regional States’ Autonomy in Ethiopia. In: LeVan A. C., Fashagba J. O., McMahon E. R. (eds) African State Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
[15]	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[16]	Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.
[17]	Robert, Collins, (1971). Land Beyond the Rivers: The Southern Sudan, 1898-1918. New Haven: Yale University press.
[18]	Dereje, Feyissa, (2006). The experience of the Gambella regional state. In: Turton, D. (2006). Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in Comparative Perspective. London: James Currey.
[19]	Hashim, Tewfik, (2010). Transition To Federalism: The Ethiopian experience. Forum of Federations, 700- 325 Dalhousie, ottawa, Ontario (Canada) k1n 7G2, p. 613-244-3360, forum@forumfed.org.
[20]	Mulugeta, Abebe Wolde (2005). A critical assessment of institutions, roles and leverage in public policymaking: Ethiopia, 1974-2004. Thesis (PhD), School of Public Management and Planning, University of Stellenbosch.
[21]	Young, Crawford (1993). The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-State at Bay? Madison, Wis. u.a: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
[22]	Akol, Lam (2003). SPLM/SPLA: The Nasir Declaration. New York.
[23]	Christophe, Van der Beken, (2007). Ethiopia: from a Centralized Monarchy to a Federal Republic, Afrika Focus, Vol. 20, Nr. 1-2, 2007, pp. 13-48, p. 38.
[24]	Assefa, Fiseha, (2005). Federalism and the Adjudication of Constitutional Issues: The Ethiopian Experience. NILR.
[25]	Gilliat, Stephen (1984). Public Policy Analysis and Conceptual Conservatism. Policy and Politics, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 345-367.
[26]	Gambela Peoples’ ’ National Regional State (2002). The Revised Constitution of Gambela Peoples’ Regional State.
[27]	Gambela Peoples’ ’ National Regional State (2002). GPNRS council rules of procedures code of conduct regulation no. 2/2001.
[28]	Merara, Gudina, (2003). Competing Ethnic Nationalism and the Quest for Democracy 1960-2000. Nezerland: N. P Shaker.
[29]	Vaughan, Sarah and Tronvoll, Kjeti. (2003). The Culture of Power in Contemporary Ethiopian Life.
[30]	Transitional Government of Ethiopia (TGE), (1991). The Transitional Period Charter. Addis Ababa: Berhanena Selam Printing Press.
[31]	Monika, M. Sommer (ND). Ethiopian Federalism Seen from the Regional State of Gambella: A Perspective from the Border Region. Unpublished.
[32]	Young, John (1999). Along Ethiopia's Western Frontier: Gambella and Benishangul in Transition. The Journal of Modern African Studies. Vol. 37, No. 2 (Jun., 1999), pp. 321-346 (26 pages).
[33]	Chuol, Gew (2004). Complex Conflict in Gambella – in the aftermath of the 2002/2003 events, paper, unpublished.
[34]	Elazar, D. (1991). Federal models of (civil) authority. Journal of Church and State, 33 (2): 231.
[35]	Kassahun, Berhanu, (2005). Parliament and Dominant Party System in Ethiopia. In: Salih M. A. M. (Eds) African Parliaments. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
[36]	Merera, Gudina (2011) Elections and democratization in Ethiopia, 1991–2010, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 5: 4, 664-680, DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2011.642524.
[37]	Aalen, Lovise (2006). Ethnic Federalism and Self-Determination for Nationalities in a Semi-Authoritarian State: the Case of Ethiopia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 13 (2): 243-261.
[38]	Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher (2014). Decentralization and Regional and Local Development: Trends and Policy Implications’ in Dessalegn Rahmato et al (eds.). Reflections on Development in Ethiopia, Forum for Social Studies, 20142.
[39]	ECA (Economic Commission for Africa), (2007). Political Parties in Public Policies. Fourth Meeting of the Committee on Human Development and Civil Society Development. Governance and Public Administration Division. Addis Ababa.
[40]	Erwin, van Veen (2016). Perpetuating power: Ethiopia’s political settlement and the organization of security. https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2016/power_politics_and_security_in_ethiopia/.
[41]	FDRE, Office of the prime minster (2019). Homegrown economic reform program.
[42]	Biniyam, Negash (2014). Federation among Unequal’s; implications and Moderation of Political Asymmetry in Ethiopia‘S Federal System. MA thesis. Addis Ababa.
[43]	Abraham, Sewonet, (2002). Breaking the Cycle of Conflict in Gambella Region. UN Emergencies Unit for Ethiopia.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. (2021). The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 5(2), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2021, 5(2), 69-90. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2021;5(2):69-90. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12,
  author = {Fikre Kura Gizaw},
  title = {The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State},
  journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {69-90},
  doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20210502.12},
  abstract = {The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state’s ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of ‘democratic centralism’ and ‘party discipline’; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State
AU  - Fikre Kura Gizaw
Y1  - 2021/08/18
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
SP  - 69
EP  - 90
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4621
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
AB  - The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state’s ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of ‘democratic centralism’ and ‘party discipline’; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fikre Kura Gizaw

African Leadership Excellence Academy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. (2021). The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 5(2), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2021, 5(2), 69-90. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fikre Kura Gizaw. The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2021;5(2):69-90. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12,
  author = {Fikre Kura Gizaw},
  title = {The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State},
  journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {69-90},
  doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20210502.12},
  abstract = {The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state’s ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of ‘democratic centralism’ and ‘party discipline’; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples’ National Regional State
AU  - Fikre Kura Gizaw
Y1  - 2021/08/18
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
SP  - 69
EP  - 90
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4621
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20210502.12
AB  - The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state’s ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of ‘democratic centralism’ and ‘party discipline’; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download