Public private partnership (PPP) projects like any infrastructure projects have large sunk costs and are area specificity, meaning once constructed they cannot be reallocated and used in a different area as they are only useful in the area where their services are needed. Due to these characteristics, PPPs have high risk of opportunistic behaviour embedded in them. These traits increase investment risks on the part of the private investor. Before any investor decides to participate in an infrastructure project like PPPs, it needs assurance that certain institutional requirements for PPPs in the country in question exist. Existence of such conditions bring about comfort to the investor that the investment will be a success. This expectation is a legitimate one given the high risk associated with infrastructure projects. Once an investment in infrastructure has been made, the investor’s bargaining power declines due to area specificity of such projects and that increases the investment risk for the investor. Hence, the existence of robust regulatory and legal frameworks is imperative for private sector investments in infrastructure projects as they seek to create a level playing field for all parties involved. The objective of this paper is therefore, to discuss these institutional and regulatory requirements from the perspective of a PPP project.
| Published in | Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13 |
| Page(s) | 72-80 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Public Private Partnerships, Institutional Arrangements, Regulatory Frameworks, Legal System, Corruption
| [1] | Adei, S. (2009). State and non-state actors’ partnership and collaboration: The implications for capacity building in public service: Paper presented at Africa service conference on Ministers of Public Service, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania, 17–18 June. |
| [2] | The United Kingdom Better Regulation Task Force and the Victoria Consumer Affairs. (2008). Research paper No. 14, May. Available from: file:///C:/Users/MPA105698/Downloads/Better%20business%20regulation%202008.PDF. [Accessed on 06 September 2022]. |
| [3] | Allan, R. J. (1999). ‘Public-private partnerships: a review of literature and practice. Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy’. Public Policy Paper No. 4, fourth quarter. Unpublished. |
| [4] | Asian Development Bank. (1999). ‘Private sector participation and infrastructure investment in Asia: The impact of the currency crisis. Volatility opportunity’, Paper prepared for APEC Finance Ministers meeting by Asian Development Bank. March. |
| [5] | Atalla, A. and Hakim, T. n. d. Joint ownership: A new approach in public-private partnerships [online]. Available from: http://paiman.jsi.com/Resources/Docs/review-of-public-private-partnership-models.pdf [Accessed on 22 October 2013]. |
| [6] | Republic of South Africa. (2004). National Treasury, PPP Manual Module 1: South African Regulations for PPPs. National Treasury Practice Note No. 02. Pretoria: National Treasury. |
| [7] | Banerjee, S.G., Oetzel, J.M. and Ranganathan, R. (2006), Private Provision of Infrastructure in Emerging Markets: Do Institutions Matter? Development Policy Review, 24: 175-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2006.00321.x |
| [8] | Bergara, M. E., Henisz, J. W. & Spiller, T. P. (1998). ‘Political institutions and electric utility investment: a cross-nation analysis’, California Management Review, (40) (2): 18–35. |
| [9] | Bloomfield, P. (2006). ‘The challenging business of long-term public-private partnership: Reflections on local experience’, Public Administration Review, (66) 93: 400–411. |
| [10] | Botric, V. and Skuflic, L. (2005). Main determinants of foreign investment in the South-East European countries: Challenges for employment and growth in the European Union. Paper prepared at the 2nd Euroframe Conference on Economic Policy Issues in the European Union “Trade FDI and Relocation. Vienna, Austra, 3 June. |
| [11] | Burger, P. (2006). ‘The dedicated PPP unit of the South African National Treasury’. A paper presented at the Symposium on Agencies and Public-Private Partnerships, organized by the OECD and the Intervention General de la Estado (IGAE), in collaboration with the Secretary-General of Budget and Expenditure, held in Madrid, Spain, 5–7 July. |
| [12] | Carino, L. V. (2008). ‘Towards a strong republic: enhancing the accountability of the Philippine state’. Public Administration Quarterly, (32) (1): 59–92. |
| [13] | Cook, P. (1999). ‘Privatization and utility regulation in developing countries: The lessons so far’. Annuals of Public and Cooperative Economics, (70) (4): 549–587. |
| [14] | Dahdal, A. (2010). ‘The dissolution of public private partnerships: an Australian case study of the political costs involved’. International Review of Business Research Papers, (6) (2): 1–11. |
| [15] | Dethier, J., Ghanem, H. & Zoli, E. (1999). Does democracy facilitate the economic transition? An empirical study of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Paper presented at a seminar at the World Bank, June. |
| [16] | Economic Commission for Africa, (2005). African governance report: economic governance and public financial management. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [17] | Emery, J. (2003): Governance, transparency and private investment in Africa. Encouraging modern governance and transparency for investment: Why and How? Global forum on international investment. OECD-Africa Investment Roundtable. Johannesburg, South Africa. Hosted by the South African Government, African Union and Economic Commission for Africa. 17–18 November. |
| [18] | European Commission. (2003). Guidelines for successful public-private partnerships. Brussels: European Commission. |
| [19] | Farrugia, C. R. and Orr, R. J. (2008). ‘Public-private partnership agencies: A global perspective [online]. Stanford University Working Paper No. 39, August. Available from: http://www.nawc.org/uploads/documents-and-publications/documents/document_02445830-0b21-4f61-8b65-bad5f5989467.pdf [Accessed on 21 August 2014]. |
| [20] | Fitch-Ratings. (2003). ‘Public-private partnerships: the next generation of infrastructure finance’. International Public Finance Special Report, January. |
| [21] | Fjeldstad, O., Kolstad, I. & Nygaard, K. (2006). ‘Bribes, taxes and regulations: business constraints for micro enterprises in Tanzania’. CHR Michelsen Institute (CMI) WP. 2006: 2. Available from: http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/2124-bribes-taxes-and-regulations. [accessed on 22 October 2013]. |
| [22] | Youssef, A., Noorbakhsh, F., Alberto, P. and. (2001). Human capital and FDI inflows to developing countries: New empirical evidence. World Development, (29) (9): 1593–1610. |
| [23] | FSD- Africa, GIZ, AfDB, MFW4A, and CAHF, (2019). Long-Term Finance in Côte d’Ivoire: Country Diagnostic Report / September 2019. |
| [24] | Wildridge, V, Childs, S, Cawthra, L & Madge, B. (2004). ‘How to create successful partnerships? A review of the literature’, Health information and Libraries Journal, (21): 3–9. |
| [25] | Harris, C. (2003). ‘Private participation in infrastructure in developing countries: Trends, impacts, and policy lessons’. World Bank Working paper, No. 5. Washington DC. April. |
| [26] | Hirchhausen, C., Beckers, T. & Brenck, A. (2004). ‘Regulation and long-term investment in infrastructure provision-theory and policy’. Public Sector Management and Regulation Working Papers. Utilities Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 203–210. |
| [27] | International Monetary Fund. (2003). ‘FDI to Africa: the role of price stability and currency instability’. IMF Working Paper, WP/03/10. |
| [28] | International Monetary Fund. (2006). ‘A principal-agent theory approach to public expenditure management systems in developing countries’. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/204. Washington: IMF. |
| [29] | Isham, J., Kaufmann, D. & Pritchett, H. L. (1997). ‘Civil liberties, democracy, and the performance of government projects’. The World Bank Economic Review. Vol, 11 No. 2, pp. 219–242. Washington DC. World Bank. |
| [30] | Wei, S-J. (2000). ‘How Taxing is corruption on international investors’, Review of Economics and Statistics, (82) (1): 1–11. |
| [31] | Kintanar, N. (2009). How to meet the challenges of PPP development in the current financial and economic crisis. A paper delivered at the International Experts Meeting on Public Private Partnerships, UN ESCAP, Bangkok Thailand, February. |
| [32] | Mabuza, P. (2019). Is the Public Private Partnership Model the Right Vehicle for Public Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries? Journal of Economics and Behavioural Studies, 2019, vol. 11, issue 1, 211-222. |
| [33] | Mauro, P. (1995). ‘Corruption and growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, (110) (3): 681–712. |
| [34] | Mwilima, N. (2003). Foreign direct investment in Africa. Social Observatory Pilot Project. Africa Labour Research Network. Labour Resource and Research Institute (LaRRI), September. |
| [35] | OECD. (2006). Review of the national policy, legislative and institutional environment necessary for the establishment of municipal public private partnerships (PPPs) for public service delivery and local development in the Europe and CIS region. UNDP Capacity 2015/PPPUE-Public private partnerships programme. March. OECD. |
| [36] | OECD. (2008). Public private partnerships: in pursuit of risk sharing and value for Money. OECD publishing. Available at: www.sourceoecd.org/finance/ 9789264042797. [Accessed on 15 November 2011]. |
| [37] | Orissa. (2007). Orissa public private partnership policy 2007. Planning and Co-ordination Department, resolution No. 12711 / PPP 38/2006. |
| [38] | Osinubi, T. S. and Amaghionyeodiwe, L. A. (2009). ‘Foreign direct investment and exchange rate volatility in Nigeria’, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, (6) (2): 83–116. |
| [39] | Owasanoye, B. (2000). Alternative dispute resolution methods: Paper written following a UNITAR Sub-Regional Workshop on arbitration and dispute resolution, 11–15 September 2000. Document series No. 14. Geneva, March. |
| [40] | Pargal, S. (2003). Regulation and private sector investment in infrastructure: evidence from Latin America. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3037, April. |
| [41] | Parker, D. and Hartely, K. (2002). ‘Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: a case study of UK defence’. In Grimsey, D. and Lewis M. K. eds. The Economics of Public Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar publishing. 303–314. |
| [42] | Pongsiri, N. (2002). ‘Regulation and public-private partnerships’, The international Journal of Public Sector Management, (15) (6/7): 487–495. |
| [43] | Ramamurti, R. and Doh, J. P. (2004). Rethinking foreign infrastructure investment in developing countries. Journal of World Business, (39): 151–167. |
| [44] | Republic of South Africa. National Treasury. (2007). Medium-Term expenditure Framework (MTEF). Pretoria: National Treasury. |
| [45] | Rives. J. M. & Heaney, M. T. (1995). Infrastructure and local economic development. Regional Science, Perspectives, 25 (1), 58–73. |
| [46] | Rodrik, D. (1990). ‘Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries’, Journal of Development Economics, (36) (1991): 229–242. |
| [47] | Scandizzo, S. (2007). Public-private partnerships and the infrastructure challenge in Latin America. Latin America Emerging Markets Forum. November. |
| [48] | Scully, G. W. (1988). ‘The institutional framework and economic of development’, Journal of Political Economy, (96) (3): 652–662. |
| [49] | SPAID. (2007). Key Challenges to Public Private Partnerships in South Africa: Summary of Interview Findings. An initiative of the presidency of the republic of South Africa and the Business Trust. Report No. 1, April. |
| [50] | Tam, C. M. (1999). ‘Build-operate-transfer model for infrastructure developments in Asia: reasons for successes and failures’, International Journal of Project Management, (17) (6): 377–382. |
| [51] | The Republic of Kenya. (2022). The Public Finance Management (National Roads Toll Fund), Regulations, 2021. |
| [52] | United Kingdom (Her Majesty Treasury). (2003). PFI: meeting the investment challenge. London: Her Treasury. |
APA Style
Patrick Mabuza. (2022). Institutional and Regulatory Framework for PPP Projects: Creating a Conducive Environment for PPPs in Developing Countries. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 6(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13
ACS Style
Patrick Mabuza. Institutional and Regulatory Framework for PPP Projects: Creating a Conducive Environment for PPPs in Developing Countries. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2022, 6(2), 72-80. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13,
author = {Patrick Mabuza},
title = {Institutional and Regulatory Framework for PPP Projects: Creating a Conducive Environment for PPPs in Developing Countries},
journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
pages = {72-80},
doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20220602.13},
abstract = {Public private partnership (PPP) projects like any infrastructure projects have large sunk costs and are area specificity, meaning once constructed they cannot be reallocated and used in a different area as they are only useful in the area where their services are needed. Due to these characteristics, PPPs have high risk of opportunistic behaviour embedded in them. These traits increase investment risks on the part of the private investor. Before any investor decides to participate in an infrastructure project like PPPs, it needs assurance that certain institutional requirements for PPPs in the country in question exist. Existence of such conditions bring about comfort to the investor that the investment will be a success. This expectation is a legitimate one given the high risk associated with infrastructure projects. Once an investment in infrastructure has been made, the investor’s bargaining power declines due to area specificity of such projects and that increases the investment risk for the investor. Hence, the existence of robust regulatory and legal frameworks is imperative for private sector investments in infrastructure projects as they seek to create a level playing field for all parties involved. The objective of this paper is therefore, to discuss these institutional and regulatory requirements from the perspective of a PPP project.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Institutional and Regulatory Framework for PPP Projects: Creating a Conducive Environment for PPPs in Developing Countries AU - Patrick Mabuza Y1 - 2022/10/18 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13 DO - 10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13 T2 - Science, Technology & Public Policy JF - Science, Technology & Public Policy JO - Science, Technology & Public Policy SP - 72 EP - 80 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4621 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20220602.13 AB - Public private partnership (PPP) projects like any infrastructure projects have large sunk costs and are area specificity, meaning once constructed they cannot be reallocated and used in a different area as they are only useful in the area where their services are needed. Due to these characteristics, PPPs have high risk of opportunistic behaviour embedded in them. These traits increase investment risks on the part of the private investor. Before any investor decides to participate in an infrastructure project like PPPs, it needs assurance that certain institutional requirements for PPPs in the country in question exist. Existence of such conditions bring about comfort to the investor that the investment will be a success. This expectation is a legitimate one given the high risk associated with infrastructure projects. Once an investment in infrastructure has been made, the investor’s bargaining power declines due to area specificity of such projects and that increases the investment risk for the investor. Hence, the existence of robust regulatory and legal frameworks is imperative for private sector investments in infrastructure projects as they seek to create a level playing field for all parties involved. The objective of this paper is therefore, to discuss these institutional and regulatory requirements from the perspective of a PPP project. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: