Several insects feed on rice, but stalk-eyed shoot fly is considered the most important rice pests. Among the insect management options, the use of insecticides is suitable for immediate action and remained an exclusive management method in the countries where agricultural technologies are not well advanced. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of seven insecticides viz., Hanclopa 48% EC, Dimeto 40% EC, Datrate 5% EC, Diazinon 60% EC, Fipronil 5% SC, Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC and Star Profenofos 72% EC at Pawe Agricultural Research Center (PARC) of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) during 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at Pawe village 17. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and X-jigna rice variety was used. The results revealed that applications of insecticides were found effective over the unsprayed control. The lowest number of dead heart per plot (47.17 per plot) was recorded on the plot treated with Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide which gave the highest grain yield of (3503.50 kg ha-1), followed by Fipronil 5% SC (3166 kg ha-1). Therefore, the present result suggests that twice application of Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide at a rate of 0.4 Lha-1 is effective for the management of rice stalk-eyed shoot fly in Pawe and other areas with a similar condition. Further study should consider evaluation of larger number of insecticides against the insect both in green house and under field condition.
Published in | Advances (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14 |
Page(s) | 57-63 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Alpha-Cyproid, Dead Heart Symptom, Infestation, Larval Stage, Management
Months | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min T (°C) | Max T (°C) | RF (mm) | RH (%) | Min T (°C) | Max T (°C) | RF (mm) | RH (%) | |
January | 12.61 | 34.43 | 0.00 | 65.90 | 13.84 | 36.18 | 0.00 | 78.42 |
February | 16.66 | 38.03 | 0.00 | 63.93 | 17.08 | 36.75 | 0.00 | 58.53 |
March | 16.97 | 38.17 | 0.00 | 59.68 | 19.32 | 38.00 | 0.00 | 59.68 |
April | 18.55 | 37.99 | 0.00 | 65.00 | 21.41 | 38.50 | 0.00 | 63.13 |
May | 19.85 | 35.51 | 170.70 | 64.66 | 21.46 | 35.59 | 97.30 | 74.40 |
June | 18.97 | 29.93 | 315.70 | 85.97 | 18.78 | 30.32 | 309.70 | 84.33 |
July | 18.01 | 28.82 | 338.20 | 85.87 | 18.51 | 27.85 | 422.20 | 86.90 |
August | 17.66 | 28.61 | 339.90 | 88.77 | 18.39 | 27.67 | 261.50 | 83.70 |
September | 17.74 | 30.11 | 131.00 | 86.90 | 18.25 | 28.77 | 353.10 | 88.94 |
October | 17.81 | 30.50 | 150.00 | 89.00 | 17.75 | 30.06 | 242.80 | 88.72 |
November | 15.81 | 32.31 | 70.00 | 81.74 | 16.78 | 30.86 | 36.80 | 79.45 |
December | 14.96 | 33.51 | 0.00 | 79.03 | 14.54 | 32.70 | 3.00 | 78.90 |
Mean | 17.13 | 33.16 | 126.29 | 76.37 | 18.01 | 32.77 | 143.87 | 77.09 |
SN | Trade name | Common name (Active ingredients) | Application rate ha-1 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dimithoate 40% EC | Dimeto 40% EC | 950ml |
2 | Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC+95% others | Datrate 5% EC | 320ml |
3 | Vetazinon 60% EC | Diazinon 60%EC | 1L |
4 | Fipronil 5% SC+ other inert materials | Lipron 50 SC | 3L |
5 | Lambda cyhalothrin 5% +W/V+95 W/V inert materials | Hanclopa 48% EC | 400ml |
6 | Alpha cypermethrin 100g/lit+ 90 g/lit inert ingredient | Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC | 0.4L |
7 | Profenofos 72%EC | Star Profenofos 72%EC | 500ml |
Insecticide | PH | PL | NFGPP | NUnFGPP | TSW | GY | NDH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hanclopa 48% EC | 99.00 | 18.80ab | 107.13ab | 9.13a | 26.70 | 3312.32ab | 33.67b |
Diazinon 60% EC | 94.73 | 17.67b | 91.80c | 5.60c | 27.00 | 2932.93b | 38.67ab |
Control | 97.27 | 19.07ab | 104.93abc | 8.07abc | 26.33 | 2887.84b | 54.77a |
Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC | 98.73 | 18.33ab | 99.07bc | 8.27ab | 26.17 | 3771.24a | 49.00ab |
Star Profenofos 72% EC | 97.67 | 19.20ab | 107.20ab | 6.47bc | 26.00 | 3263.51ab | 38.67ab |
Dimeto 40% EC | 98.07 | 18.87ab | 108.00ab | 6.47bc | 26.47 | 3118.46b | 45.33ab |
Datrate 5% EC | 95.07 | 17.73ab | 94.67bc | 6.8abc | 26.33 | 3403.24ab | 47.00ab |
Fipronil 5% SC | 99.60 | 19.67a | 118.40a | 9.13a | 26.67 | 3270.19ab | 51.33a |
Mean | 97.55 | 18.67 | 103.90 | 7.49 | 26.46 | 3244.96 | 44.80 |
CV (%) | 3.24 | 6.04 | 7.96 | 19.78 | 3.21 | 10.60 | 21.80 |
LSD (p<0.05) | NS | * | * | * | NS | * | * |
Insecticide | PH | PL | NFGPP | NUnFGPP | TSW | GY | NDH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hanclopa 48% EC | 97.87ab | 18.13abc | 101.80abc | 4.07b | 26.17 | 2518.55 | 71.33 |
Diazinon 60% EC | 93.80b | 16.60c | 83.27c | 6.47ab | 25.83 | 2319.92 | 59.67 |
Control | 97.33ab | 18.20abc | 99.87abc | 5.93ab | 26.67 | 2342.67 | 76.00 |
Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC | 104.30a | 18.70ab | 105.53ab | 4.80b | 25.83 | 3235.75 | 45.33 |
Star Profenofos 72% EC | 96.93ab | 17.53bc | 88.13bc | 5.67b | 25.17 | 2398.08 | 72.33 |
Dimeto 40% EC | 102.20ab | 19.47a | 109.80a | 9.00a | 26.67 | 2910.54 | 65.67 |
Datrate 5% EC | 101.27ab | 17.87abc | 96.87abc | 6.67ab | 26.17 | 2555.00 | 57.67 |
Fipronil 5% SC | 99.33ab | 17.80abc | 85.47c | 5.80ab | 25.33 | 3062.50 | 59.33 |
Mean | 99.13 | 18.04 | 96.34 | 6.05 | 25.98 | 2667.88 | 63.42 |
CV (%) | 5.72 | 5.60 | 11.03 | 30.52 | 4.86 | 20.99 | 31.74 |
LSD (p<0.05) | * | * | * | * | NS | NS | NS |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
m.a.s.l | Meters above sea level |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
IRRI | International Rice Research Institute |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
NDH | Number of Dead Heart |
[1] | FAO. (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2015). Production. In: The FAO Rice Market Monitor 18(4), 1-33. |
[2] | Hadush H. (2015). Factors Affecting Adoption of Upland Rice and Its Implication on System Innovation: The Case of Tselemti District, North Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia, 30-35. |
[3] | Catling H D, Islam Z, Pattrasudhi R (1984). Assessing yield losses in deepwater rice due to yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker), in Bangladesh and Thailand. Crop Prot. 6: 20-27. |
[4] | Litsinger J A, Barrion A T, Soekarna D (1987). Upland rice insect pests: their ecology, importance and control. IRRI Res. Pap. Ser. 123.41 p. |
[5] | Sarwar M. (2012). Management of rice stem borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) through host plant resistance in early, medium and late plantings of rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Cereals and Oil seeds 3 (1), 10-14. |
[6] | Nwilene FE, Souleymane MT, Philippe M, Elvis AH, Abdoulaye H, Dona D, Cyrille A, Abou T. (2013). Managing Insect Pests of Rice in Africa. In: Wopereis MCS, Ed. Realizing Africa’s Rice Promise, UK: CAB International, 229 -240. |
[7] | Savary S, FA Elazegui, HQ Pinnschmidt, NP Castilla, and PS Teng. (1997). A new approach to quantify crop losses due to rice pests in varying production situations. IRRI discussion paper series No 20. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines. 53p. |
[8] | Alvi, S. M., M. A. Ali, S. U. Chaudhary and S. Iqbal. (2003). Population trends and chemical control of rice leaf folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinas) on rice crop. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 5: 615-617. |
[9] | Togola A, Nwilene FE, Agbaka A, Degila F, Tolulope A, Chougourou D. (2011). Screening Upland Varieties of NERICA and its Parents for Resistance to Stalk-eyed Fly, Diopsis sp. (Diptera, Diopsidae) in Benin. Journal of Applied Sciences 11, 145-150. |
[10] | Abro, G. H., T. S. Syed, A. H. Shah, J. Cui, M. Sattar and M. S. Awan. (2013). Efficacy and economics of different insecticides against stem borers, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) in rice crop. Pak. J. Zool., 45 (4): 929-933. |
[11] | Skamnioti, P. and S. J. Gurr. (2009). Against the grain: safeguarding rice from rice blast disease. Trends Biotechnol., 27: 141–150. |
[12] | Rubia EG. (1994). The pest status and management of white stem borer, Scirpophaga innotata (Walker) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) in West Java, Indonesia. PhD Dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 221. |
[13] | IRRI. (2013). International Rice Research Institute. Standard Evaluation System (SES) for Rice. Manila, Philippines. |
[14] | R Core Team (2024). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. |
[15] | Ali, H., S. S. Khan, F. Maula, S. H. Shah and M. Uddin. (2022). Effect of different rice varieties and synthetic insecticides on the population density of rice stem borer Scirpiophag incertulus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(1): 105-114. |
APA Style
Yaregal, W., Gudisa, T., Enyew, M. (2025). Efficacy of Different Insecticides for the Control of Rice Stalk-eyed Shoot Fly (Diopsis longicornis) Under Field Condition at Pawe, Northwestern Ethiopia. Advances, 6(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14
ACS Style
Yaregal, W.; Gudisa, T.; Enyew, M. Efficacy of Different Insecticides for the Control of Rice Stalk-eyed Shoot Fly (Diopsis longicornis) Under Field Condition at Pawe, Northwestern Ethiopia. Advances. 2025, 6(2), 57-63. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14
@article{10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14, author = {Wasihun Yaregal and Tesfaye Gudisa and Mintwab Enyew}, title = {Efficacy of Different Insecticides for the Control of Rice Stalk-eyed Shoot Fly (Diopsis longicornis) Under Field Condition at Pawe, Northwestern Ethiopia }, journal = {Advances}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {57-63}, doi = {10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.advances.20250602.14}, abstract = {Several insects feed on rice, but stalk-eyed shoot fly is considered the most important rice pests. Among the insect management options, the use of insecticides is suitable for immediate action and remained an exclusive management method in the countries where agricultural technologies are not well advanced. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of seven insecticides viz., Hanclopa 48% EC, Dimeto 40% EC, Datrate 5% EC, Diazinon 60% EC, Fipronil 5% SC, Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC and Star Profenofos 72% EC at Pawe Agricultural Research Center (PARC) of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) during 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at Pawe village 17. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and X-jigna rice variety was used. The results revealed that applications of insecticides were found effective over the unsprayed control. The lowest number of dead heart per plot (47.17 per plot) was recorded on the plot treated with Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide which gave the highest grain yield of (3503.50 kg ha-1), followed by Fipronil 5% SC (3166 kg ha-1). Therefore, the present result suggests that twice application of Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide at a rate of 0.4 Lha-1 is effective for the management of rice stalk-eyed shoot fly in Pawe and other areas with a similar condition. Further study should consider evaluation of larger number of insecticides against the insect both in green house and under field condition. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Efficacy of Different Insecticides for the Control of Rice Stalk-eyed Shoot Fly (Diopsis longicornis) Under Field Condition at Pawe, Northwestern Ethiopia AU - Wasihun Yaregal AU - Tesfaye Gudisa AU - Mintwab Enyew Y1 - 2025/06/23 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14 DO - 10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14 T2 - Advances JF - Advances JO - Advances SP - 57 EP - 63 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7200 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20250602.14 AB - Several insects feed on rice, but stalk-eyed shoot fly is considered the most important rice pests. Among the insect management options, the use of insecticides is suitable for immediate action and remained an exclusive management method in the countries where agricultural technologies are not well advanced. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of seven insecticides viz., Hanclopa 48% EC, Dimeto 40% EC, Datrate 5% EC, Diazinon 60% EC, Fipronil 5% SC, Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC and Star Profenofos 72% EC at Pawe Agricultural Research Center (PARC) of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) during 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at Pawe village 17. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and X-jigna rice variety was used. The results revealed that applications of insecticides were found effective over the unsprayed control. The lowest number of dead heart per plot (47.17 per plot) was recorded on the plot treated with Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide which gave the highest grain yield of (3503.50 kg ha-1), followed by Fipronil 5% SC (3166 kg ha-1). Therefore, the present result suggests that twice application of Alpha-Cyproid 10% EC insecticide at a rate of 0.4 Lha-1 is effective for the management of rice stalk-eyed shoot fly in Pawe and other areas with a similar condition. Further study should consider evaluation of larger number of insecticides against the insect both in green house and under field condition. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -