In this work, we applied the first order time independent Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory, as an approximation method to calculate numerically the corrections in atomic spectra due to nuclear structure effects. The results showed that the nuclear structure effects distort the atomic spectra in different ways: The combined fine structure effect which decreases with increasing values of n, split the quantum number n into l±½ and the magnitude of the energy levels shift is of order of 10-6 eV relative to the energy levels calculated from the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. An energy level determined by the total angular momentum j of the orbiting electron are found to split further due to hyperfine structure effects with the energy difference of 5.9 × 10-6 eV. This corresponds to a wavelength is 21cm. The energy shift between 2 s 1/2 and 2 p 1/2 states due to the effects of vacuum fields on orbiting electron was calculated as 5.52 × 10-6 eV. We then continue to investigate the change in atomic spectra caused by the finite size nuclear structure effects. The finite-size nuclear structure effect on atomic spectra computed is of order of the scaling factors, ξ, ξ2 and ξ3 for n = 1, n = 2 and n = 3 atomic energy levels respectively. This showed that as the energy levels increased the effects of the finite – size nucleus on the orbiting electron is diminishing. Therefore the concept of finite nuclear size model has an extremely small impact on atomic spectra. These theoretical findings revealed some of the behavior of atomic spectra which may develop the understanding of spectroscopy and spectroscopic methods.
Published in | American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13 |
Page(s) | 39-51 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Spectroscopy, Electron Transitions, Schrödinger Equation, Quantum Numbers, Energy Shift, Finite – Size Nucleus
[1] | D. A. Skoog, D. M. West, F. J. Holler, and S. R. Crouch, Fundamentos de Química Analítica (8ª Edición, 2a reimpresión). Madrid: Paraninfo, 2008, 719-723 y 870-880. |
[2] | R. S. Shah, R. R. Shah, R. B. Pawar and P. P. Gayakar, “UV-Visible Spectroscopy- A Review,” International Journal of Institutional Pharmacy and Life Sciences 5 (5): September-October 2015. |
[3] | L. Evans, (PhD. Technical Support and Application Specialist at Biochrom Ltd) UV-VIS Spectrophotometry–A Brief Background to Spectrophotometry. Biochrom, a division of Harvert Bioscience, Inc. Issue 1.0, 2015. |
[4] | H. H. Willard, L. L. Merritt, J. A. Dean and F. A. Settle Instrumental Method of Analysis, 7th Edition, 1988. |
[5] | C. J. Mbah, “Spectroscopic Methods of Analysis: Radiation Sources and Applications,” World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp 4190–4201. |
[6] | R. Girijan, “Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry-A Powerful Analytical Technique,” Pharma Times, Vol. 44, 2012, pp 16-18. |
[7] | D. Sudunagunta, N. Venkatesh, S. N. Meyyanathan, “Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: A special emphasis on pharmaceutical and other applications,” Journal of Pharmacy Research Vol. 5 No. 2, 2012, pp 1614-1619. |
[8] | A. Beyer, Ch. G. Parthey, N. Kolachevsky, J. Alnis, K. Khabarova, R. Pohl, E. Peters, D. C. Yost, A. Matveev, K. Predehl, S. Droste, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hansch, M. Abgrall, D. Rovera, Ch. Salomon, Ph. Laurent and Th. Udem, “Precision Spectroscopy of Atomic Hydrogen,” Journal of Physics: 21st International Conference on Laser Spectroscopy – ICOLS 2013. Conference Series 467 (2013) 012003. |
[9] | A. Palffy, “Nuclear effects in atomic transitions,” arXiv:1106.3218v1 [physics.atom-ph] 16 Jun 20110. |
[10] | J. S. P. Leder and O. M. Porcu, “The Importance of UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Application in Food Products Characterization,” Scholarly Journal of Food and Nutrition. Vol. 1 No. 3, 2018. |
[11] | D. A. Skoog, and D. M. West, Análisis Instrumental (2ª Edición), México, D. F.: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, S. A. de C. V., 1984, 158-177 y 317-369. |
[12] | B. Gouthami, R. N. Rao, “An overview of recent applications of atomic absorption spectroscopy indetermination of inorganic impurities in drugs and, plants and its extracts,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2015, pp 37-45. |
[13] | D. F. Del Papa, R. A. Holt and S. D. Rosner, “Hyperfine Structure and Isotope Shifts in Dy II,” Atoms, Vol. 5, Issue 5, 2017, pp 1–10. |
[14] | M. Ahmed, M. Abdul Qadir, M. Q. Hussain, “Qualification of Atomic Absorption Spectrometer in respective View of Pharmaceutical Analysis,” American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 5, 2014, pp 674-680. |
[15] | Z. Bubnič, U. Urleb and K. Kreft, “The application of atomic absorption spectrometry for the determination of residual active pharmaceutical ingredients in cleaning validation samples,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. (2010) pp 281–289. |
[16] | N. Lewen, “The use of atomic spectroscopy in the pharmaceutical industry for the determination of trace elements in pharmaceuticals,” Vol. 55, Issue 4, 2011, pp 653–661. |
[17] | D. Sudunagunta, N. D. Venkatesh and S. N. Meyyanathan, “Journal of Pharmacy Research 2012, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp 1614–1619. |
[18] | J. M. González-López, E. M. González-Romarís, I. Idoate-Cervantes and J. F. Escanero, Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications in Medicine, Macro To Nano Spectroscopy, Dr. Jamal Uddin (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0664-7, InTech, (2012). |
[19] | D. A. Skoog, F. J. Holler, and T. A. Nieman, Principios de Análisis Instrumental (5ª Edición). Madrid: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana de España, S. A. U., 2001, pp. 122-150 y 219-244. |
[20] | W. T. Hill, and C. H. Lee, Light-Matter Interaction: Atoms and Molecules in External Fields and Nonlinear Optics, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, (2007). |
[21] | B. Cagnac, J. C. Pebay-Peyroula. Modern atomic Physics, Part1 Fundamental Principles. Macmillan, 1975. |
[22] | T. Nebel, “The Lamb Shift in Muonic Hydrogen,” Max-Planck-Institut fur Quantenoptik Hans-Kopfermann Str. 185748 Garching, Deutschland, (2010). |
[23] | W. Greiner, Quantum Mechanics, An Introduction, Fourth Edition, Springer, Berlin, Germany. (2011) pp. 181, 220–222. |
[24] | G. Herzberg, Atomic Spectra and Atomic Structure; Dover: Mineola, New York, 1944. |
[25] | H. E. White, “Introduction to Atomic Spectra” McGraw-Hill: New York, 1934. |
[26] | O. Sala, K. Araki, and L. K. Noda, “A Procedure to Obtain the Effective Nuclear Charge from the Atomic Spectrum of Sodium,” Journal of Chemical Education. Vol. 76 No. 9, 1999, pp 1269–1271. |
[27] | Ann-Marie Martensson-Pendrill, “Atoms Through the Looking Glass -A Relativistic Challenge,” Can. J. Phys. Vol. 99, 2007, pp 1–16. |
[28] | A. Adamu, P. Tartius and S. A. Amshi, “The Spectroscopy of Single Electron and Muonic Atoms,” Journal of Physical Science and Innovations, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2016 pp 1–13. |
[29] | B. Thaller, “Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics,” Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. New York, USA. (2005) pp 58. |
[30] | E. Schrodinger, Sitzungber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys.-Math. Kl. 24, 418 (1930). |
[31] | B. G. Sidharth, “Revisiting Zitterbewegung,” IJTP, February 2009, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 497 – 506. |
[32] | B. G. Sidharth, Adarsh Nagar, Abhishek Das and Adarsh Nagar. The Zitterbewegung Region arXiv:1704.00840v1 [physics.gen-ph] 4 Apr 2017. |
[33] | R. F. Gauthier, “FTL Quantum Models of the Photon and the Electron,” Space Technology and Applications International Forum – STAIF – 2007, edited by M. S. El – Genk, American Institute of Physics 978-0-7354-0386. |
[34] | K. H. Knuth, “The Problem of Motion: The Statistical Mechanics of Zitterbewegung,” web: http://knuthlab.rit.albany.edu [Accessed October, 2018] |
[35] | D. Hestenes, Electron time, mass and zitter (2008), “The Nature of Time” FQXi 2008 Essay Contest. |
[36] | N. Sirica and R. Van Wesep, Fine and Hyperfine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom. aesop.phys.utk.edu [Access July, 2018]. |
[37] | S. K. Kenneth, Introductory Nuclear Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York. (1988) pp. 12. |
[38] | A. Adamu and Y. H. Ngadda, “The Nuclear Finite–Size Corrections to Energies of n = 1, n = 2 and n = 3 States of Hydrogen Atom,” J–NAMP. Vol. 30, (2015) pp 133–137. |
[39] | L. Yung-Kuo, Problems and Solutions on Atomic, Nuclear and Particle Physics, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. Singapore, (2000), pp. 61- 68. |
[40] | D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA. (1995) pp. 181, 222, 248–251. |
[41] | G. W. Erickson, “Energy Levels of One-Electron Atoms,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol. 6, No. 3. (1977) pp. 831–869. |
[42] | L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum Mechanics, Non-relativistic Theory,” Volume 3 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Third edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England. (1991) pp. 119. |
[43] | T. A. Welton, “Some Observable Effects of the Quantum Mechanical Fluctuations of the Electromagnetic Field,” Phys. Rev., vol. 74, 1157, 1948. |
[44] | H. A. Bethe, “The electromagnetic shift of energy levels,” Phys. Rev. Vol. 72, 1947, pp 339–341. |
[45] | A. Dasand B. G. Sidharth, “Revisiting the Lamb Shift,” EJTP 12, No. IYL15-34 (2015) 139–152. |
[46] | R. Hofstadter, Ann. Rev. Nuclear Sci. 7, 231 (1957). |
[47] | R. Hofstadter, Revs. Modern Phys. 28, 214 (1956). |
[48] | R. Hofstadter and R. W. McAllister, Phys. Rev. 98, 217 (1955). |
[49] | M. R. Yearian and R. Hofstadter, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Series. II, 2, 389 (1957). |
[50] | M. R. Yearian and R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. 110, 552 (1958). |
[51] | Blankenbecler, R. Hofstadter, and M. R. Yearian. This work was reported in a review article by R. Hofstadter, Revs. Modern Phys. 28, 214 (1956) |
APA Style
Aliyu Adamu, Muhammad Hassan, Mohammed Kyari Dikwa, Salamatu Ahmad Amshi. (2019). Determination of Nuclear Structure Effects on Atomic Spectra by Applying Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory. American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy, 2(2), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13
ACS Style
Aliyu Adamu; Muhammad Hassan; Mohammed Kyari Dikwa; Salamatu Ahmad Amshi. Determination of Nuclear Structure Effects on Atomic Spectra by Applying Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory. Am. J. Quantum Chem. Mol. Spectrosc. 2019, 2(2), 39-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13, author = {Aliyu Adamu and Muhammad Hassan and Mohammed Kyari Dikwa and Salamatu Ahmad Amshi}, title = {Determination of Nuclear Structure Effects on Atomic Spectra by Applying Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory}, journal = {American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {39-51}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajqcms.20180202.13}, abstract = {In this work, we applied the first order time independent Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory, as an approximation method to calculate numerically the corrections in atomic spectra due to nuclear structure effects. The results showed that the nuclear structure effects distort the atomic spectra in different ways: The combined fine structure effect which decreases with increasing values of n, split the quantum number n into l±½ and the magnitude of the energy levels shift is of order of 10-6 eV relative to the energy levels calculated from the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. An energy level determined by the total angular momentum j of the orbiting electron are found to split further due to hyperfine structure effects with the energy difference of 5.9 × 10-6 eV. This corresponds to a wavelength is 21cm. The energy shift between 2 s 1/2 and 2 p 1/2 states due to the effects of vacuum fields on orbiting electron was calculated as 5.52 × 10-6 eV. We then continue to investigate the change in atomic spectra caused by the finite size nuclear structure effects. The finite-size nuclear structure effect on atomic spectra computed is of order of the scaling factors, ξ, ξ2 and ξ3 for n = 1, n = 2 and n = 3 atomic energy levels respectively. This showed that as the energy levels increased the effects of the finite – size nucleus on the orbiting electron is diminishing. Therefore the concept of finite nuclear size model has an extremely small impact on atomic spectra. These theoretical findings revealed some of the behavior of atomic spectra which may develop the understanding of spectroscopy and spectroscopic methods.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determination of Nuclear Structure Effects on Atomic Spectra by Applying Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory AU - Aliyu Adamu AU - Muhammad Hassan AU - Mohammed Kyari Dikwa AU - Salamatu Ahmad Amshi Y1 - 2019/01/11 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13 T2 - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy JF - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy JO - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy SP - 39 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7308 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20180202.13 AB - In this work, we applied the first order time independent Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory, as an approximation method to calculate numerically the corrections in atomic spectra due to nuclear structure effects. The results showed that the nuclear structure effects distort the atomic spectra in different ways: The combined fine structure effect which decreases with increasing values of n, split the quantum number n into l±½ and the magnitude of the energy levels shift is of order of 10-6 eV relative to the energy levels calculated from the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. An energy level determined by the total angular momentum j of the orbiting electron are found to split further due to hyperfine structure effects with the energy difference of 5.9 × 10-6 eV. This corresponds to a wavelength is 21cm. The energy shift between 2 s 1/2 and 2 p 1/2 states due to the effects of vacuum fields on orbiting electron was calculated as 5.52 × 10-6 eV. We then continue to investigate the change in atomic spectra caused by the finite size nuclear structure effects. The finite-size nuclear structure effect on atomic spectra computed is of order of the scaling factors, ξ, ξ2 and ξ3 for n = 1, n = 2 and n = 3 atomic energy levels respectively. This showed that as the energy levels increased the effects of the finite – size nucleus on the orbiting electron is diminishing. Therefore the concept of finite nuclear size model has an extremely small impact on atomic spectra. These theoretical findings revealed some of the behavior of atomic spectra which may develop the understanding of spectroscopy and spectroscopic methods. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -