| Peer-Reviewed

Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation

Received: 20 February 2020     Accepted: 16 March 2020     Published: 14 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The paradigm of constraints that is proposed by optimality theory as a substitute to the rules paradigm has influenced all the fields of linguistics. Different phonological phenomena in different many languages have been investigated in terms of optimality theory. The phonological structures of Arabic suffer from some changes like deletion, substitution and other processes that underlie the systematic derivation (Al-ishtiqaaq) of vowels. In terms of Optimality Theory, this paper investigates two issues: First, the conflicted faithfulness and markedness constraints that govern vowels through derivation, and second, how these constraints are ranked. Finding out such constraints can provide the storage of the universal constraints by new ones and discovering how Arabic ranks these universal constraints. The current study adopted the mechanism that is proposed by the optimality theory. At the same time, the paper suggested some constraints that has been tested and formulated according to the theory in question. The ranking of these constraints also have been investigated. The study led to demonstrating the existence of the suggested constraints that work during derivation. It also represented how these constraints are ranked. Some of the discovered constraints are already found in the universal storage of constraints and others are peculiar to Arabic. It is found that the SAK constraint (the absence of the Arabic short vowels) plays a fundamental role in vowels derivation.

Published in Arabic Language, Literature & Culture (Volume 6, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12
Page(s) 37-42
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Arabic Derivation, Optimality Theory, Vowel, Constraints, Ranking, Deletion, Substitution

References
[1] Bradley, T. (2014). Optimality Theory and Spanish Phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 65-88.
[2] Haro, A. H. (2020). The vowel /u/ before deleted word-final /s/, /r/, and /θ/ in Eastern Andalusian Spanish.
[3] Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (1993, 2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
[4] Archangeli, D. (1997). Optimality theory: an introduction to linguistics in the 1990s. In Diana Archangeli and Terence Langendoen (eds.). Optimality Theory: An Overview. Cambridge: Blackwell.
[5] Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
[6] Boersma, P., Dekkers, J. & Weijer, J. (eds.). (2000). Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7] Kager, R. (2004). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Baković, E. (2013). Blocking and Complementarity in Phonological Theory. United Kingdom: Equinox eBooks Publishing.
[9] Barke, S., Kunkel, R., Polikarpova, N., Meinhardt, E., Bakovic, E., & Bergen, L. (2019). “Constraint-based Learning of Phonological Processes.” Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019).
[10] Lacy, P. (2007). Themes in phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Hale, M. and Ress, C. (2008). The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[12] McCarthy, J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (ed.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[14] McCarthy, J. (ed.). (2004). Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell publishing.
[15] McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh-Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics Vol. 18. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
[16] Abu-Chacra, F. (2007). Arabic: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.
[17] Watson, J. (2002). The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fareed Hameed Al-Hindawi, Dhaifullah Zamil Al-Jashamy. (2021). Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation. Arabic Language, Literature & Culture, 6(2), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fareed Hameed Al-Hindawi; Dhaifullah Zamil Al-Jashamy. Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation. Arab. Lang. Lit. Cult. 2021, 6(2), 37-42. doi: 10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fareed Hameed Al-Hindawi, Dhaifullah Zamil Al-Jashamy. Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation. Arab Lang Lit Cult. 2021;6(2):37-42. doi: 10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12,
      author = {Fareed Hameed Al-Hindawi and Dhaifullah Zamil Al-Jashamy},
      title = {Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation},
      journal = {Arabic Language, Literature & Culture},
      volume = {6},
      number = {2},
      pages = {37-42},
      doi = {10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.allc.20210602.12},
      abstract = {The paradigm of constraints that is proposed by optimality theory as a substitute to the rules paradigm has influenced all the fields of linguistics. Different phonological phenomena in different many languages have been investigated in terms of optimality theory. The phonological structures of Arabic suffer from some changes like deletion, substitution and other processes that underlie the systematic derivation (Al-ishtiqaaq) of vowels. In terms of Optimality Theory, this paper investigates two issues: First, the conflicted faithfulness and markedness constraints that govern vowels through derivation, and second, how these constraints are ranked. Finding out such constraints can provide the storage of the universal constraints by new ones and discovering how Arabic ranks these universal constraints. The current study adopted the mechanism that is proposed by the optimality theory. At the same time, the paper suggested some constraints that has been tested and formulated according to the theory in question. The ranking of these constraints also have been investigated. The study led to demonstrating the existence of the suggested constraints that work during derivation. It also represented how these constraints are ranked. Some of the discovered constraints are already found in the universal storage of constraints and others are peculiar to Arabic. It is found that the SAK constraint (the absence of the Arabic short vowels) plays a fundamental role in vowels derivation.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Conflicts of Vowel Governed Constraints in Arabic Derivation
    AU  - Fareed Hameed Al-Hindawi
    AU  - Dhaifullah Zamil Al-Jashamy
    Y1  - 2021/05/14
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12
    T2  - Arabic Language, Literature & Culture
    JF  - Arabic Language, Literature & Culture
    JO  - Arabic Language, Literature & Culture
    SP  - 37
    EP  - 42
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2639-9695
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20210602.12
    AB  - The paradigm of constraints that is proposed by optimality theory as a substitute to the rules paradigm has influenced all the fields of linguistics. Different phonological phenomena in different many languages have been investigated in terms of optimality theory. The phonological structures of Arabic suffer from some changes like deletion, substitution and other processes that underlie the systematic derivation (Al-ishtiqaaq) of vowels. In terms of Optimality Theory, this paper investigates two issues: First, the conflicted faithfulness and markedness constraints that govern vowels through derivation, and second, how these constraints are ranked. Finding out such constraints can provide the storage of the universal constraints by new ones and discovering how Arabic ranks these universal constraints. The current study adopted the mechanism that is proposed by the optimality theory. At the same time, the paper suggested some constraints that has been tested and formulated according to the theory in question. The ranking of these constraints also have been investigated. The study led to demonstrating the existence of the suggested constraints that work during derivation. It also represented how these constraints are ranked. Some of the discovered constraints are already found in the universal storage of constraints and others are peculiar to Arabic. It is found that the SAK constraint (the absence of the Arabic short vowels) plays a fundamental role in vowels derivation.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of English, College of Education, Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq

  • Department of English, College of Education, Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq

  • Sections