It is intended, in this brief essay, to make a parallel between the authors Félix Guattari, Franco Berardi and Jacques Lacan, especially with regard to ecosophy (and its three registers, namely: that of the environment, that of subjectivity and that of social relations), the financial logic and its excesses (the financialization of everyday practices) and the capitalist discourse (version of the master's discourse, in Lacanian theory), respectively, aiming to criticize the current economic model and its repercussions in the ecological crisis of the Anthropocene. To this end, an introduction to the authors and their theories was established, a diagnosis of the contemporary context (as a diagnosis of the present, from a historical-conceptual interpretation), perspectives of analysis (based on interlocution), from the aforementioned authors, and ecosophy, art and new practices were listed for structural changes in view of the criticisms pointed out in the text. Finally, a conclusion was reached, open to discussion (more as a provocation, a reflection), in the face of issues such as ESG, circular economy and organizational culture. In this sense, it should be noted that such practices cannot serve only as marketing, as imposture (which often happens), but as effective actions, especially in the corporate field.
Published in | Innovation (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14 |
Page(s) | 60-63 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ecosophy, Financial Economy, Capitalism, Ecological Crisis, Anthropocene, Psychoanalysis, Politics
[1] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 07. |
[2] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 08. |
[3] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 15. |
[4] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 17. |
[5] | BERARDI, Franco (2020). Asfixia (Asphyxia). Ubu, 2020. |
[6] | BERARDI, Franco (2020). Asfixia (Asphyxia). Ubu, 2020, p. 08. |
[7] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies) Papirus, p. 26. |
[8] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 32. |
[9] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 35. |
[10] | BERARDI, Franco (2020). Asfixia (Asphyxia). Ubu, 2020, p. 16. |
[11] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 37. |
[12] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 46-47. |
[13] | GUATTARI, Felix (1989). As três ecologias (The three ecologies). Papirus, p. 51-55. |
[14] | LACAN, Jacques (1993). Televisão (TV). Zahar, p. 32-34. |
APA Style
Guilherme Reolon de Oliveira. (2022). Finance, Ecosophy and the Capitalist's Discourse: Approximations Between Berardi, Guattari and Lacan. Innovation, 3(2), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14
ACS Style
Guilherme Reolon de Oliveira. Finance, Ecosophy and the Capitalist's Discourse: Approximations Between Berardi, Guattari and Lacan. Innovation. 2022, 3(2), 60-63. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14
@article{10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14, author = {Guilherme Reolon de Oliveira}, title = {Finance, Ecosophy and the Capitalist's Discourse: Approximations Between Berardi, Guattari and Lacan}, journal = {Innovation}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {60-63}, doi = {10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.innov.20220302.14}, abstract = {It is intended, in this brief essay, to make a parallel between the authors Félix Guattari, Franco Berardi and Jacques Lacan, especially with regard to ecosophy (and its three registers, namely: that of the environment, that of subjectivity and that of social relations), the financial logic and its excesses (the financialization of everyday practices) and the capitalist discourse (version of the master's discourse, in Lacanian theory), respectively, aiming to criticize the current economic model and its repercussions in the ecological crisis of the Anthropocene. To this end, an introduction to the authors and their theories was established, a diagnosis of the contemporary context (as a diagnosis of the present, from a historical-conceptual interpretation), perspectives of analysis (based on interlocution), from the aforementioned authors, and ecosophy, art and new practices were listed for structural changes in view of the criticisms pointed out in the text. Finally, a conclusion was reached, open to discussion (more as a provocation, a reflection), in the face of issues such as ESG, circular economy and organizational culture. In this sense, it should be noted that such practices cannot serve only as marketing, as imposture (which often happens), but as effective actions, especially in the corporate field.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Finance, Ecosophy and the Capitalist's Discourse: Approximations Between Berardi, Guattari and Lacan AU - Guilherme Reolon de Oliveira Y1 - 2022/06/30 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14 DO - 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14 T2 - Innovation JF - Innovation JO - Innovation SP - 60 EP - 63 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7138 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.14 AB - It is intended, in this brief essay, to make a parallel between the authors Félix Guattari, Franco Berardi and Jacques Lacan, especially with regard to ecosophy (and its three registers, namely: that of the environment, that of subjectivity and that of social relations), the financial logic and its excesses (the financialization of everyday practices) and the capitalist discourse (version of the master's discourse, in Lacanian theory), respectively, aiming to criticize the current economic model and its repercussions in the ecological crisis of the Anthropocene. To this end, an introduction to the authors and their theories was established, a diagnosis of the contemporary context (as a diagnosis of the present, from a historical-conceptual interpretation), perspectives of analysis (based on interlocution), from the aforementioned authors, and ecosophy, art and new practices were listed for structural changes in view of the criticisms pointed out in the text. Finally, a conclusion was reached, open to discussion (more as a provocation, a reflection), in the face of issues such as ESG, circular economy and organizational culture. In this sense, it should be noted that such practices cannot serve only as marketing, as imposture (which often happens), but as effective actions, especially in the corporate field. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -