Objective: To evaluate the influence of individualized nursing care on Chinese postpartum women. Methods: We invited 182 participants to join our study, who are childbirth in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, their childbirth time is from April 2016 to October 2019. They were randomly assigned to control group (n=91) and intervention group (n=91), the two group receive different nursing services, such as individualized nursing care and traditional nursing services. We use Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and other questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient comfort status, patient satisfaction status, anxiety status and depression status. Result: In comfort research, the comfort status of most patient is 0 level in control group and intervention group (n=44 & n=56). On the other hand, the control group had more 1 level assessment in this result (n=22). In satisfaction report, the performance of individualized nursing care is better than traditional nursing services in satisfaction [86 (94.5%) vs 77 (84.6%)]. In SDS and SAS research, The intervention group had greater improvement than that of control group in the SAS as the result of intervention group lowered scores even more. Conclusion: the individualized nursing care have great improvement to improve hospital satisfaction and mental health of patients. But the individualized nursing care has little effect on improving patient comfort.
| Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13 |
| Page(s) | 45-47 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Individualized Nursing Care, Postpartum Women, Mental Health
| [1] | Charalambous A, Adamakidou T, Cloconi C, Charalambous M, Tsitsi T, Vondrackova L, Buzgova R. The quality of oncology nursing care: a cross sectional survey in three countries in Europe. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2017; 27: 45–52. |
| [2] | Hughes R. Overview and summary: patient-centered care: challenges and rewards. Online J. Issues Nurs. 2016; 16 (2): 3–9. |
| [3] | Coyle N. Palliative care, hospice care and bioethics - a natural fit. J. Hospice Palliat. Nurs. 2015; 16: 6–12. |
| [4] | Shuman AG, Montas SM, Barnosky AR, Smith LB, Fins JJ, McCabe MS. Clinical ethics consultation in oncology. J. Oncol. Pract. 2016; 9: 240–245. |
| [5] | Wiegand D, Russo MM. Ethical consideration. In: Dahlin, C. M., Lynch, M. T. (Eds.), Core Curriculum for the Advanced Practice Nurse. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, Pittsburgh, PA. 2013: 39–59. |
| [6] | Rahman A, Fisher J, Bower P, Luchters S, Tran T, Yasamy MT, Saxena S, Waheed W. Interventions for common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013; 91: 593–601I. |
| [7] | Fellmeth G, Fazel M, Plugge E. Migration and perinatal mental health in women from low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017; 124: 742–752. |
| [8] | Lindsay M, Burnett E. The use of narcotics and street drugs during pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; 56 (1): 133–141. |
| [9] | Fawcett EJ, Fairbrother N, Cox ML, White IR, Fawcett JM. The prevalence of anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a multivariate bayesian meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2019: 80. |
| [10] | Top ED, Cetisli NE, Guclu S, Zengin EB. Paternal depression rates in prenatal and postpartum periods and affecting factors. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2016: 30: 747–752. |
| [11] | White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454. |
| [12] | El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688. |
| [13] | Poorolajal J, Alafchi B, Najafi Vosoogh R, Hamzeh S, & Ghahramani M. Risk factors for maternal mortality in the west of Iran: A nested case-control study. Epidemiol Health. 2016; 36, e2014028. |
| [14] | Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J. Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2016; 2 (6): e323–333. |
| [15] | WHO. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. Infant mortality. Situation and trends. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/neonatal_infant_text/en/. |
| [16] | WHO. Maternal mortality. Fact sheet No. 348. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en. |
| [17] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2018; 67 (8): 50. |
| [18] | Brooker D. Person Centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better. Jessica Kingsley, London. 2007. |
APA Style
Linping Huang, Xinke Huang, Wenchan Feng. (2020). Evaluating the Influence of Individualized Nursing Care on Chinese Postpartum Women. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 8(2), 45-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13
ACS Style
Linping Huang; Xinke Huang; Wenchan Feng. Evaluating the Influence of Individualized Nursing Care on Chinese Postpartum Women. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 8(2), 45-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13
AMA Style
Linping Huang, Xinke Huang, Wenchan Feng. Evaluating the Influence of Individualized Nursing Care on Chinese Postpartum Women. J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;8(2):45-47. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13,
author = {Linping Huang and Xinke Huang and Wenchan Feng},
title = {Evaluating the Influence of Individualized Nursing Care on Chinese Postpartum Women},
journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
volume = {8},
number = {2},
pages = {45-47},
doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20200802.13},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the influence of individualized nursing care on Chinese postpartum women. Methods: We invited 182 participants to join our study, who are childbirth in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, their childbirth time is from April 2016 to October 2019. They were randomly assigned to control group (n=91) and intervention group (n=91), the two group receive different nursing services, such as individualized nursing care and traditional nursing services. We use Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and other questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient comfort status, patient satisfaction status, anxiety status and depression status. Result: In comfort research, the comfort status of most patient is 0 level in control group and intervention group (n=44 & n=56). On the other hand, the control group had more 1 level assessment in this result (n=22). In satisfaction report, the performance of individualized nursing care is better than traditional nursing services in satisfaction [86 (94.5%) vs 77 (84.6%)]. In SDS and SAS research, The intervention group had greater improvement than that of control group in the SAS as the result of intervention group lowered scores even more. Conclusion: the individualized nursing care have great improvement to improve hospital satisfaction and mental health of patients. But the individualized nursing care has little effect on improving patient comfort.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating the Influence of Individualized Nursing Care on Chinese Postpartum Women AU - Linping Huang AU - Xinke Huang AU - Wenchan Feng Y1 - 2020/04/23 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 45 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20200802.13 AB - Objective: To evaluate the influence of individualized nursing care on Chinese postpartum women. Methods: We invited 182 participants to join our study, who are childbirth in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, their childbirth time is from April 2016 to October 2019. They were randomly assigned to control group (n=91) and intervention group (n=91), the two group receive different nursing services, such as individualized nursing care and traditional nursing services. We use Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and other questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient comfort status, patient satisfaction status, anxiety status and depression status. Result: In comfort research, the comfort status of most patient is 0 level in control group and intervention group (n=44 & n=56). On the other hand, the control group had more 1 level assessment in this result (n=22). In satisfaction report, the performance of individualized nursing care is better than traditional nursing services in satisfaction [86 (94.5%) vs 77 (84.6%)]. In SDS and SAS research, The intervention group had greater improvement than that of control group in the SAS as the result of intervention group lowered scores even more. Conclusion: the individualized nursing care have great improvement to improve hospital satisfaction and mental health of patients. But the individualized nursing care has little effect on improving patient comfort. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: