In this paper, social empowerment programs for remote indigenous peoples (KAT) evaluated to ensure that the program has run according to established rules or needs improvement and strengthening. This study uses qualitative methods, and the location chosen as the object is Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. This study was conducted in the KAT Village location: Pancoran Kum Hamlet, North Mangoli District. The result showed that the social empowerment program implementation for remote indigenous communities in the Kadai tribe community in Pancoran Kum Hamlet, Waisakai Village, North Mangoli sub-district, has been going well. According to the determined mechanism, it is seen from the community's positive response when receiving a remote customary community housing program that has been completed. The social service incorporation and village community empowerment is an inhibiting factor in social empowerment programs implementation for small indigenous communities in Pancoram Kum Hamlet. Also, limited funds are an inhibiting factor social empowerment programs implementation, where every year is only IDR 350 Million budgeted in the social sector, one of which is in KAT midwives. Therefore, an increase in the funding portion of both central and regional governments need to maximize the implementation program. The Provincial Government needs to build cooperation with the regency/city government to follow up on the Central Government empowerment program after the community has been successfully relocated or organized in one settlement.
Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 4, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11 |
Page(s) | 61-70 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Social Empowerment, Remote Indigenous People, People Welfare, Poverty Alleviation
[1] | T. Mardikanto and P. Soebianto, Community Empowerment in a Public Policy Perspective, Indonesian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2012. |
[2] | H. A. Nikkhah and M. Redzuan, “Participation as a medium of empowerment in community development,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 170–176, 2009. |
[3] | S. H. Appelbaum, D. Hébert, and S. Leroux, “Empowerment: Power, culture and leadership – a strategy or fad for the millennium?,” J. Work. Learn., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 233–254, 1999. |
[4] | G. K. Sutawa, “Issues on Bali Tourism Development and Community Empowerment to Support Sustainable Tourism Development,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 4, no. Icsmed, pp. 413–422, 2012. |
[5] | Y. F. Setyobudi, “Pengentasan Kemiskinan Melalui Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri,” Dimensi, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 176–189, 2012. |
[6] | F. Merlan, From a Comparative Perspective: Epilogue, vol. 7. 2017. |
[7] | S. Soemantri, Anthology of Indonesian Constitutional Law, Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1992. |
[8] | H. K. Klein and D. L. Kleinman, “The social construction of technology: Structural considerations,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 28–52, 2002. |
[9] | J. A. Kuypers, Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action. Lexington: Lexington Books, 2009. |
[10] | E. Mayer, RR, Greenwood, The design of social policy. Prentice-Hall, 1980. |
[11] | D. L. Weimer and A. R. Vining, Policy Analysis. Taylor & Francis, 2017. |
[12] | H. D. Lasswell and K. Abraham, Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. Transaction Publishers, 2013. |
[13] | Thomas R. Dye, Understanding Public Policy, 9th ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 1998. |
[14] | H. Eulau and P. Kenneth, Labyrinths of democracy: Adaptations, linkages, representation, and policies in urban politics. Ardent Media, 1973. |
[15] | C. J. Friedrich, “Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility,” Public, pp. 3–24, 1940. |
[16] | J. E. Anderson, D. W. Brady, C. S. Bullock, and J. Stewart, Public policy and politics in America. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press, 1978. |
[17] | D. Easton, “The perception of authority and political change,” Authority, vol. 179, 1958. |
[18] | P. Bridgman and D. Glyn, The Australian policy handbook. Allen & Unwin, 2004. |
[19] | G. H. Jenkins, The foundations of modern Wales: Wales 1642-1780. USA: Oxford University Press, 1987. |
[20] | E. Bardach, The Implementation Game. Massachusette: Cambridge, 1991. |
[21] | George C. Edwards III, “Presidential Legislative Skills as a Source of Influence in Congress,” Pres. Stud. Q., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 211–223, 1980. |
[22] | Van Horn, Carl E. and Donald S. Van Meter, “The implementation of intergovernmental policy,” Policy Stud. Rev. Annu., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 97-120., 1977. |
[23] | S. Paul and D. Mazmanian, “The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives,” Policy Anal., vol. 5, no. 481–504, 1979. |
[24] | R. J. Parsons, “Empowerment practice,” Encycl. Soc. Work, 2013. |
[25] | D. Gagliardi, L. Schina, M. L. Sarcinella, G. Mangialardi, F. Niglia, and A. Corallo, “Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 153–166, 2017. |
[26] | M. S. Reed, “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 141, no. 10, pp. 2417–2431, 2008. |
[27] | P. S. Jones, “Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: Is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy?,” Urban Stud., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 581–601, 2003. |
[28] | K. Hung, E. Sirakaya-Turk, and L. J. Ingram, “Testing the Efficacy of an Integrative Model for Community Participation,” J. Travel Res., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 276–288, 2011. |
[29] | J. M. Cohen and N. T. Uphoff, “Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity,” World Dev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 213–235, 1980. |
[30] | C. Van Vollenhoven, “Law Areas,” in Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indie (Van Vollehhoven on Indonesian Adat Law), Netherlands: The Hague-Martinus Nijhoff, 1981. |
[31] | H. B. Teer, Adat Law In Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhratara, 1962. |
[32] | Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage publications, 1994. |
[33] | Ibrahim, Abdul Halil Hi, Muhlis Hafel, and Abdul Rahman Abdullah, "The Implementation Of Policy On Expansion Development of Employment Opportunities For Productive Workforce In Tidore City," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 269-275, 2018. |
[34] | Ibrahim, Abdul Halil Hi, Aji Deni, and Ramli Sugianto. "The Performance of Local Government Company In Tidore City," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 211-215, 2018. |
[35] | Ibrahim, Abdul Halil Hi, Abdullah Kaunar, and Ichsan Nurfalah Adrias, "Government Performance on Property Tax Services Of Rural And Urban Areas In Ternate City," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 161-166, 2018. |
[36] | Ibrahim, Abdul Halil Hi, Muhlis Hafel, and Iryani S. Lamasi, "Jailolo Bay Festival As A Model For Developing Cultural Tourism In West Halmahera," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 167-176, 2018. |
APA Style
Abdulhalil Hi Ibrahim, Muhlis Hafel, Saiful Deni, Syaiful Madjid, Saman Fokaaya. (2020). Social Empowerment of Remote Indigenous Peoples: Study of Village Housing Program in Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(4), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11
ACS Style
Abdulhalil Hi Ibrahim; Muhlis Hafel; Saiful Deni; Syaiful Madjid; Saman Fokaaya. Social Empowerment of Remote Indigenous Peoples: Study of Village Housing Program in Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. J. Public Policy Adm. 2020, 4(4), 61-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11
AMA Style
Abdulhalil Hi Ibrahim, Muhlis Hafel, Saiful Deni, Syaiful Madjid, Saman Fokaaya. Social Empowerment of Remote Indigenous Peoples: Study of Village Housing Program in Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. J Public Policy Adm. 2020;4(4):61-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11
@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11, author = {Abdulhalil Hi Ibrahim and Muhlis Hafel and Saiful Deni and Syaiful Madjid and Saman Fokaaya}, title = {Social Empowerment of Remote Indigenous Peoples: Study of Village Housing Program in Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia}, journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration}, volume = {4}, number = {4}, pages = {61-70}, doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20200404.11}, abstract = {In this paper, social empowerment programs for remote indigenous peoples (KAT) evaluated to ensure that the program has run according to established rules or needs improvement and strengthening. This study uses qualitative methods, and the location chosen as the object is Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. This study was conducted in the KAT Village location: Pancoran Kum Hamlet, North Mangoli District. The result showed that the social empowerment program implementation for remote indigenous communities in the Kadai tribe community in Pancoran Kum Hamlet, Waisakai Village, North Mangoli sub-district, has been going well. According to the determined mechanism, it is seen from the community's positive response when receiving a remote customary community housing program that has been completed. The social service incorporation and village community empowerment is an inhibiting factor in social empowerment programs implementation for small indigenous communities in Pancoram Kum Hamlet. Also, limited funds are an inhibiting factor social empowerment programs implementation, where every year is only IDR 350 Million budgeted in the social sector, one of which is in KAT midwives. Therefore, an increase in the funding portion of both central and regional governments need to maximize the implementation program. The Provincial Government needs to build cooperation with the regency/city government to follow up on the Central Government empowerment program after the community has been successfully relocated or organized in one settlement.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Social Empowerment of Remote Indigenous Peoples: Study of Village Housing Program in Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia AU - Abdulhalil Hi Ibrahim AU - Muhlis Hafel AU - Saiful Deni AU - Syaiful Madjid AU - Saman Fokaaya Y1 - 2020/10/21 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 61 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.11 AB - In this paper, social empowerment programs for remote indigenous peoples (KAT) evaluated to ensure that the program has run according to established rules or needs improvement and strengthening. This study uses qualitative methods, and the location chosen as the object is Sula District North Maluku, Indonesia. This study was conducted in the KAT Village location: Pancoran Kum Hamlet, North Mangoli District. The result showed that the social empowerment program implementation for remote indigenous communities in the Kadai tribe community in Pancoran Kum Hamlet, Waisakai Village, North Mangoli sub-district, has been going well. According to the determined mechanism, it is seen from the community's positive response when receiving a remote customary community housing program that has been completed. The social service incorporation and village community empowerment is an inhibiting factor in social empowerment programs implementation for small indigenous communities in Pancoram Kum Hamlet. Also, limited funds are an inhibiting factor social empowerment programs implementation, where every year is only IDR 350 Million budgeted in the social sector, one of which is in KAT midwives. Therefore, an increase in the funding portion of both central and regional governments need to maximize the implementation program. The Provincial Government needs to build cooperation with the regency/city government to follow up on the Central Government empowerment program after the community has been successfully relocated or organized in one settlement. VL - 4 IS - 4 ER -