A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice

Alhadi Jahan; Abdulhakim Ellibidy

doi:doi:10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

| Peer-Reviewed

A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice

Alhadi Jahan, Abdulhakim Ellibidy

Published in Rehabilitation Science (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 25 February 2017 Accepted: 23 March 2017 Published: 11 April 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Background: Since rehabilitation practice focuses on working in multidisciplinary teams to optimize the physical, psychological, and social outcomes of the patient, conceptual models are extremely important in providing a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Aim: Although rehabilitation-related conceptual models have appeared in the literature more than fifty years ago or so, there has been no systematic efforts to review them. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing rehabilitation models and to link these models to the ICF model of the World Health Organization. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in different databases including Medline and PubMed using terms such as: “rehabilitation” AND “Model” OR “Framework” OR “conceptualization”. 43 citations were identified and further evaluated by two judges according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Six conceptual rehabilitation models were identified in the literature: the Biomedical Model, the Social Model, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPS), the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps Model (ICIDH), the Community Based Rehabilitation Model (CBR), and the Health-Related Quality of Life Model (HRQoL). The concepts on which the models are built were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The majority of the concepts from the six models could be linked to the ICF model. Conclusion: By applying the conceptual models, an additional perspective can be added by rehabilitation therapists to multidisciplinary teams that use the ICF model. When relationships are highly complex, as they are in rehabilitation processes, it is challenging to develop models that are applied in different contexts. However, it is possible to establish relationships between different variables that are observable.

Published in	Rehabilitation Science (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
Page(s)	46-53
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rehabilitation Models, Health-Related Quality of Life, ICF, Community-Based Rehabilitation Model, Social Model

References

[1]	Davis S. Rehabilitation: The Use of Theories and Models in Practice. First. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2006.
[2]	Statistics C. Participation and activity limit ation survey 2006: a profile of assistive technology for people with disabilities. Stat Can 2006.
[3]	Hammel J, Southall K, Jutai J et al. Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013 Vol84 P294-304 2013; 8:294–304.
[4]	George PP, Heng B, Wong L et al. Determinants of health related quality of life among community dwelling elderly in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2013; 22.
[5]	Steve Tylor, Field D. Sociology of Health and Health Care. 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.
[6]	Engel GL. The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine. Science 1977; 196:129–36.
[7]	Nettleton S. The Sociology of Health and Illness. 2 edition. Polity, 2006.
[8]	Atkinson P. Ethnomethodology - a critical review. Annu Rev Sociol 1988; 14:441–65.
[9]	Durell S. How the social model of disability evolved. Nurs Times 2014; 110:20–2.
[10]	Owens J. Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: the transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power. Sociol Health Illn 2015; 37:385–403.
[11]	Santrock J. A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development, 3rd Edition. 3rd edition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hil, 2005, 2005.
[12]	Pilgrim D. The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: Past, present and future? J Ment Health 2002 Vol116 P585-594 2002; 11:585–94.
[13]	Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137:535–44.
[14]	Robinson D. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7:60–60.
[15]	Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E et al. Use of the ICF Model as a Clinical Problem-Solving Tool in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82:1098–107.
[16]	World Report on Disability. World Health Organization, 2011:24.
[17]	Cornielje H, Velema JP, Finkenflügel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: Monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results. Lepr Rev 2008; 79:36–49.
[18]	Iemmi V, Blanchet K, Gibson LJ et al. Community-based rehabilitation for people with physical and mental disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dev Eff 2016:1–20.
[19]	Chatterjee S, Patel V, Chatterjee A et al. Evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation model for chronic schizophrenia in rural India. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182:57–62.
[20]	Kuipers P, Foster M, Carlson G et al. Classifying client goals in community-based ABI rehabilitation: a taxonomy for profiling service delivery and conceptualizing outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003 Vol253 P154-162 2003; 25:154–62.
[21]	Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72:193.
[22]	Walker AJ, Onus M, Doyle M et al. Cognitive rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A pilot programme of goal planning and outdoor adventure course participation. Brain Inj 2005 Vol1914 P1237-1241 2005; 19:1237–41.
[23]	Stilwell P, Stilwell J, Hawley C et al. Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: the Community Outcome Scale. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12:521–31.
[24]	Pal DK, Chaudhury G. Preliminary validation of a parental adjustment measure for use with families of disabled children in rural India. Child Care Health Dev 1998; 24:315–24.
[25]	Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation 2002; 25:163–71.
[26]	Jitapunkul S, Bunnag S, Ebrahim S. Effectiveness and cost analysis of community-based rehabilitation service in Bangkok. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet 1998; 81:572–8.
[27]	Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE et al. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh Off Publ Sigma Theta Tau Int Honor Soc Nurs 2005; 37:336–42.
[28]	Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:622–9.
[29]	Bredow T. Analysis, Evaluation, and Selection of a Middle Range. Middle Range Theor Appl Nurs Res 2009:46.
[30]	Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Psychometric assessment of the quality of life index. Res Nurs Health 1992; 15:29–38.
[31]	Bakas T, Mclennon SM, Carpenter J et al. Systematic review of health-related quality of life models. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10, DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-134.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alhadi Jahan, Abdulhakim Ellibidy. (2017). A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabilitation Science, 2(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alhadi Jahan; Abdulhakim Ellibidy. A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabil. Sci. 2017, 2(2), 46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alhadi Jahan, Abdulhakim Ellibidy. A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabil Sci. 2017;2(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14,
  author = {Alhadi Jahan and Abdulhakim Ellibidy},
  title = {A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice},
  journal = {Rehabilitation Science},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {46-53},
  doi = {10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rs.20170202.14},
  abstract = {Background: Since rehabilitation practice focuses on working in multidisciplinary teams to optimize the physical, psychological, and social outcomes of the patient, conceptual models are extremely important in providing a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Aim: Although rehabilitation-related conceptual models have appeared in the literature more than fifty years ago or so, there has been no systematic efforts to review them. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing rehabilitation models and to link these models to the ICF model of the World Health Organization. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in different databases including Medline and PubMed using terms such as: “rehabilitation” AND “Model” OR “Framework” OR “conceptualization”. 43 citations were identified and further evaluated by two judges according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Six conceptual rehabilitation models were identified in the literature: the Biomedical Model, the Social Model, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPS), the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps Model (ICIDH), the Community Based Rehabilitation Model (CBR), and the Health-Related Quality of Life Model (HRQoL). The concepts on which the models are built were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The majority of the concepts from the six models could be linked to the ICF model. Conclusion: By applying the conceptual models, an additional perspective can be added by rehabilitation therapists to multidisciplinary teams that use the ICF model. When relationships are highly complex, as they are in rehabilitation processes, it is challenging to develop models that are applied in different contexts. However, it is possible to establish relationships between different variables that are observable.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice
AU  - Alhadi Jahan
AU  - Abdulhakim Ellibidy
Y1  - 2017/04/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
T2  - Rehabilitation Science
JF  - Rehabilitation Science
JO  - Rehabilitation Science
SP  - 46
EP  - 53
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-594X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
AB  - Background: Since rehabilitation practice focuses on working in multidisciplinary teams to optimize the physical, psychological, and social outcomes of the patient, conceptual models are extremely important in providing a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Aim: Although rehabilitation-related conceptual models have appeared in the literature more than fifty years ago or so, there has been no systematic efforts to review them. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing rehabilitation models and to link these models to the ICF model of the World Health Organization. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in different databases including Medline and PubMed using terms such as: “rehabilitation” AND “Model” OR “Framework” OR “conceptualization”. 43 citations were identified and further evaluated by two judges according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Six conceptual rehabilitation models were identified in the literature: the Biomedical Model, the Social Model, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPS), the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps Model (ICIDH), the Community Based Rehabilitation Model (CBR), and the Health-Related Quality of Life Model (HRQoL). The concepts on which the models are built were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The majority of the concepts from the six models could be linked to the ICF model. Conclusion: By applying the conceptual models, an additional perspective can be added by rehabilitation therapists to multidisciplinary teams that use the ICF model. When relationships are highly complex, as they are in rehabilitation processes, it is challenging to develop models that are applied in different contexts. However, it is possible to establish relationships between different variables that are observable.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Alhadi Jahan

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Abdulhakim Ellibidy

Physiotherapy Department, College of Medical Technology, Misurata, Libya

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alhadi Jahan, Abdulhakim Ellibidy. (2017). A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabilitation Science, 2(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alhadi Jahan; Abdulhakim Ellibidy. A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabil. Sci. 2017, 2(2), 46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alhadi Jahan, Abdulhakim Ellibidy. A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabil Sci. 2017;2(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14,
  author = {Alhadi Jahan and Abdulhakim Ellibidy},
  title = {A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice},
  journal = {Rehabilitation Science},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {46-53},
  doi = {10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rs.20170202.14},
  abstract = {Background: Since rehabilitation practice focuses on working in multidisciplinary teams to optimize the physical, psychological, and social outcomes of the patient, conceptual models are extremely important in providing a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Aim: Although rehabilitation-related conceptual models have appeared in the literature more than fifty years ago or so, there has been no systematic efforts to review them. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing rehabilitation models and to link these models to the ICF model of the World Health Organization. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in different databases including Medline and PubMed using terms such as: “rehabilitation” AND “Model” OR “Framework” OR “conceptualization”. 43 citations were identified and further evaluated by two judges according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Six conceptual rehabilitation models were identified in the literature: the Biomedical Model, the Social Model, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPS), the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps Model (ICIDH), the Community Based Rehabilitation Model (CBR), and the Health-Related Quality of Life Model (HRQoL). The concepts on which the models are built were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The majority of the concepts from the six models could be linked to the ICF model. Conclusion: By applying the conceptual models, an additional perspective can be added by rehabilitation therapists to multidisciplinary teams that use the ICF model. When relationships are highly complex, as they are in rehabilitation processes, it is challenging to develop models that are applied in different contexts. However, it is possible to establish relationships between different variables that are observable.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice
AU  - Alhadi Jahan
AU  - Abdulhakim Ellibidy
Y1  - 2017/04/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
T2  - Rehabilitation Science
JF  - Rehabilitation Science
JO  - Rehabilitation Science
SP  - 46
EP  - 53
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-594X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170202.14
AB  - Background: Since rehabilitation practice focuses on working in multidisciplinary teams to optimize the physical, psychological, and social outcomes of the patient, conceptual models are extremely important in providing a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Aim: Although rehabilitation-related conceptual models have appeared in the literature more than fifty years ago or so, there has been no systematic efforts to review them. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing rehabilitation models and to link these models to the ICF model of the World Health Organization. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in different databases including Medline and PubMed using terms such as: “rehabilitation” AND “Model” OR “Framework” OR “conceptualization”. 43 citations were identified and further evaluated by two judges according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Six conceptual rehabilitation models were identified in the literature: the Biomedical Model, the Social Model, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (BPS), the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps Model (ICIDH), the Community Based Rehabilitation Model (CBR), and the Health-Related Quality of Life Model (HRQoL). The concepts on which the models are built were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The majority of the concepts from the six models could be linked to the ICF model. Conclusion: By applying the conceptual models, an additional perspective can be added by rehabilitation therapists to multidisciplinary teams that use the ICF model. When relationships are highly complex, as they are in rehabilitation processes, it is challenging to develop models that are applied in different contexts. However, it is possible to establish relationships between different variables that are observable.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download