TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location

Deny Jollyta

doi:doi:10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

| Peer-Reviewed

TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location

Deny Jollyta

Published in Software Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 8 February 2018 Accepted: 25 February 2018 Published: 20 March 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The selection of the location of property development becomes an important thing for the property company. The location must match the company's target. Locations that do not meet the criteria will pose problems such as large costs incurred in development, long construction completion time and marketing difficulties where low consumer interest in property so that the firm must lower the selling price. Therefore the location is selected based on several criteria. Typically, property firms have different location criteria. However, the criteria used concern the structure of the soil to the completeness of the correspondence. In this study, the selection of 3 locations of property development, A, B and C, through a decision support system. A total of 32 predefined criteria are processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. TOPSIS is one of the decision support methods that can solve multi criteria problems and can produce decisions quickly and precisely. Land data, criteria, alternatives, weighting criteria, survey results and criteria values are internal data used in this system. TOPSIS results show that location A is the best location because it has the highest preference value of 0.6. That is, location A has the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the furthest distance from the negative ideal solution.

Published in	Software Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.se.20180601.14
Page(s)	20-26
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Property, Location, Decision Support System, Multicriteria, TOPSIS

References

[1]	Agrawal, V. P., Kohli, V, and Gupta, S. (1991). Computer Aided Robot Selection: The Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach. Journal of Production Research 29 (8), 1629-1644.
[2]	Ahmadi, H., Rad, M. S. et. all (2013). Ranking The Micro Level Critical Factors of Electronic Medical Records Adoption Using TOPSIS Method. Journal of Health Informatics-An International: vol. 2.
[3]	Belenson, S. M. and Kapur, K. C. (1973). An Algorithm for Solving Multi criterion Linier Programming Problems with Examples. Journal of Operational Research Quarterly 24 (1), 65-77.
[4]	Chen, M. F. and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Combining Gray Relation and TOPSIS Concepts for Selecting an Expatriate Host Country. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling 40, 1473-1490.
[5]	Christian, A. V., Zhang, Y. and Salifou, C. K. (2016). Country Selection for International Expansion: TOPSIS Method Analysis. Journal of Scientific Research Publishing 7, 470-476.
[6]	Eraslan, S. (2015). A Decision Making Method Via TOPSIS on Soft Sets. Journal of New Result in Science 8, 57-71.
[7]	Fei, L., Hu, Y. et. al (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Journal of Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 14 pages.
[8]	Feng, C. M. and Wang, R. T. (2001). Considering The Financial Ratios on The Performance Evaluation of Highway Bus Industry. Journal of Transport Reviews 21 (4), 449-467.
[9]	Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[10]	Janic, M. (2003). Multi criteria Evaluation of High-Speed Rail, Transrapid Maglev and Air Passenger Transport in Europe. Journal of Transportation Planning and Technology 26 (6), 491-512.
[11]	Jee, D. H. and Kang, K. J. (2000). A Method for Optimal Material Selection Aided with Decision Making Theory. Journal of Materials & Design 21, 199-206.
[12]	Kahraman, C., Engin, O., Kabak, O. and Kaya, I. (2009). Information Systems Outsourcing Decision Using a Group Decision Making Approach. Journal of Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22 (6), 832-841.
[13]	Kwong, C. K. and Tam, S. M. (2002). Case-based Reasoning Approach to Concurrent Design of Low Power Transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 128, 136-141.
[14]	Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y. and Hwang, C. L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research 76 (3), 486-500.
[15]	Liang, Z., Yi, B., Yu, Z. and Wang, N. (2003). Spawning Areas and Early Development of Long Spiky-Head Carp (Luciobrama macrocephalus) in the Yangtze River and Pearl River, China. Journal of Hydrobiologia 490, 169-179.
[16]	Milani, A. S., Shanian, A. and Madoliat, R. (2005). The Effect of Normalization Norms in Multiple Attribute Decision Making Models: A Case Study in Gear Material Selection. Journal of Structural Multidiciplinary Optimization 29 (4), 312-318.
[17]	Parkan, C. and Wu, M. L. (1999). Decision-Making and Performance Measurement Models with Applications to Robot Selection. Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering 36 (3), 503-523.
[18]	Paxkan, C. and Wu, M. L. (1997). On The Equivalence of Operational Performance Measurement and Multiple Attribute Decision Making. International Journal of Production Research 35 (11), 2963-2988.
[19]	Shih, H. S., Lin, W. Y. and Lee, E. S. (2001). Group Decision Making for TOPSIS. Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, IFSA/NAFIPS, Vancouver, Canada, 2712-2717.
[20]	Shih, H. S., Shyura, H. J. and Lee, E. S. (2007). An Extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45, 801-813.
[21]	Shyura, H. J. and Shih, H. S. (2006). A Hybrid MCDM Model for Strategic Vendor Selection. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling 44 (7-8), 749-761.
[22]	Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y. D. P. and Faria, A. S. (2004). An Objective Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios. Journal of Water Resources Management 18, 35-54.
[23]	Wei, S. X. and Zhou, X. Z. (1988). Multi-Attribute Decision Making and Its Application in The c31. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing.
[24]	Yang, T. and Chou, P. (2005). Solving a Multi response Simulation-Optimization Problem with Discrete Variables using a Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method. Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 68, 9-21.
[25]	Yoon, K. P. and Hwang, C. L. (1985). Manufacturing Plant Location Analysis by Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Part I-single-plant Strategy. International Journal of Production Research 23, 345-359.
[26]	Yoon, K. P. and Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Pub., Thousand Oaks, CA.
[27]	Zeleny, M. (1974). A Concept of Compromise Solutions and The Method of The Displaced Ideal. Journal of Computers and Operations Research 1 (3-4), 479-496.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Deny Jollyta. (2018). TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Software Engineering, 6(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Deny Jollyta. TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Softw. Eng. 2018, 6(1), 20-26. doi: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Deny Jollyta. TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Softw Eng. 2018;6(1):20-26. doi: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.se.20180601.14,
  author = {Deny Jollyta},
  title = {TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location},
  journal = {Software Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {20-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.se.20180601.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.se.20180601.14},
  abstract = {The selection of the location of property development becomes an important thing for the property company. The location must match the company's target. Locations that do not meet the criteria will pose problems such as large costs incurred in development, long construction completion time and marketing difficulties where low consumer interest in property so that the firm must lower the selling price. Therefore the location is selected based on several criteria. Typically, property firms have different location criteria. However, the criteria used concern the structure of the soil to the completeness of the correspondence. In this study, the selection of 3 locations of property development, A, B and C, through a decision support system. A total of 32 predefined criteria are processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. TOPSIS is one of the decision support methods that can solve multi criteria problems and can produce decisions quickly and precisely. Land data, criteria, alternatives, weighting criteria, survey results and criteria values are internal data used in this system. TOPSIS results show that location A is the best location because it has the highest preference value of 0.6. That is, location A has the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the furthest distance from the negative ideal solution.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location
AU - Deny Jollyta
Y1 - 2018/03/20
PY - 2018
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14
DO - 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14
T2 - Software Engineering
JF - Software Engineering
JO - Software Engineering
SP - 20
EP - 26
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2376-8037
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14
AB - The selection of the location of property development becomes an important thing for the property company. The location must match the company's target. Locations that do not meet the criteria will pose problems such as large costs incurred in development, long construction completion time and marketing difficulties where low consumer interest in property so that the firm must lower the selling price. Therefore the location is selected based on several criteria. Typically, property firms have different location criteria. However, the criteria used concern the structure of the soil to the completeness of the correspondence. In this study, the selection of 3 locations of property development, A, B and C, through a decision support system. A total of 32 predefined criteria are processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. TOPSIS is one of the decision support methods that can solve multi criteria problems and can produce decisions quickly and precisely. Land data, criteria, alternatives, weighting criteria, survey results and criteria values are internal data used in this system. TOPSIS results show that location A is the best location because it has the highest preference value of 0.6. That is, location A has the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the furthest distance from the negative ideal solution.
VL - 6
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Deny Jollyta

Department of Informatics, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Pelita Indonesia, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Deny Jollyta. (2018). TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Software Engineering, 6(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Deny Jollyta. TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Softw. Eng. 2018, 6(1), 20-26. doi: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Deny Jollyta. TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location. Softw Eng. 2018;6(1):20-26. doi: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.se.20180601.14,
  author = {Deny Jollyta},
  title = {TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location},
  journal = {Software Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {20-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.se.20180601.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20180601.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.se.20180601.14},
  abstract = {The selection of the location of property development becomes an important thing for the property company. The location must match the company's target. Locations that do not meet the criteria will pose problems such as large costs incurred in development, long construction completion time and marketing difficulties where low consumer interest in property so that the firm must lower the selling price. Therefore the location is selected based on several criteria. Typically, property firms have different location criteria. However, the criteria used concern the structure of the soil to the completeness of the correspondence. In this study, the selection of 3 locations of property development, A, B and C, through a decision support system. A total of 32 predefined criteria are processed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. TOPSIS is one of the decision support methods that can solve multi criteria problems and can produce decisions quickly and precisely. Land data, criteria, alternatives, weighting criteria, survey results and criteria values are internal data used in this system. TOPSIS results show that location A is the best location because it has the highest preference value of 0.6. That is, location A has the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the furthest distance from the negative ideal solution.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download