Research Article
Influence of Manure Management Practices on Methane Emissions in Smallholder Dairy System, Northern Tanzania
Issue:
Volume 11, Issue 4, August 2026
Pages:
65-75
Received:
9 June 2026
Accepted:
29 June 2026
Published:
22 July 2026
DOI:
10.11648/j.ijees.20261104.11
Downloads:
Views:
Abstract: The expansion of smallholder dairy farming in the developing countries is associated with an increase in manure production. However, the poor management of manure leads to an increase in methane gas emissions. This study was designed to evaluate methane gas emission from manure under different manure management practices in the smallholder dairy farms in Arusha City (urban) and Arusha District Council (peri-urban), Northern Tanzania. Data were collected through a semi- structured questionnaire, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) tier two methodology was used to estimate methane gas emissions from different manure management systems, including solid storage, daily spread, anaerobic digester, composting and slurry. Data on the dairy herds’ structure and the manure management system were analysed using Chi-square. The general linear model (GLM) of the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) was used to estimate the effect of feed types and manure management systems on manure composition and methane gas emission from different management practices. The result revealed that there were significant differences in nutritional composition across feed types. There was a significant difference in dairy herd structure where urban farmers had more lactating cows, heifers and calves than those farmers in peri-urban areas. Furthermore, feed type significantly influenced manure composition, particularly volatile solids (VS) and total carbon (TC). Additionally, there were significant differences in manure composition across the manure management system in terms of volatile solids, pH, moisture, total organic matter, and total carbon. Methane gas emissions differed significantly across the manure management practices (P <0.05). The daily spread had less emission of 0.14 kg CH4 head-1year-1 which was attributed to aerobic conditions that limit methane emission, while higher emission from other management systems was due to anaerobic conditions that facilitate emissions. In conclusion, a significant variation in methane emissions was found among the manure management systems, with the highest emissions occurring in the slurry management system and the lowest in the daily spread system. The study recommends the anaerobic digestion system than over daily spread system because previous studies showed that anaerobic digester system not only mitigates methane gas emissions among smallholder dairy farmers but also optimizes the value of manure, while daily spread leads to water pollution due to runoff to surface water resources, hence causing waterborne diseases to both humans and animal.
Abstract: The expansion of smallholder dairy farming in the developing countries is associated with an increase in manure production. However, the poor management of manure leads to an increase in methane gas emissions. This study was designed to evaluate methane gas emission from manure under different manure management practices in the smallholder dairy fa...
Show More
,
David Dawson Maleko
